Paul Waldman

Paul Waldman is the Prospect's daily blogger and senior writer. He also blogs for the Plum Line at the Washington Post, and is the author of Being Right is Not Enough: What Progressives Must Learn From Conservative Success.

Recent Articles

The Cost of Iraq.

The Center for American Progress has tallied up the costs of the war in Iraq ( read the report here ), and according to their calculations, we've spent $748 billion, with up to $717 more coming in veterans' benefits. I thought it might be useful to compare this to our previous wars, so using data from this Congressional Research Service report , and adjusting the CAP figures to 2008 dollars to make it all comparable, I made this graph: Quite something -- Iraq will end up costing us more than any war except World War II. But what about casualties, you might be asking? It's been a while since we were all aware of the running tally of the number of men and women who have died in Iraq. But here are the numbers (data from here ): Of course, that doesn't count Iraqi casualties, which CAP says number at least 9,451 from the Iraqi Security Forces, and between 96,037 and 104,754 civilians. -- Paul Waldman

Citizen Ex

Democracy is hard, but sacrificing our values won't make it any easier.

When Faisal Shahzad attempted to explode his absurdly amateurish car bomb in Times Square and was quickly caught, the response was one we've come to expect. It didn't matter how forthcoming Shahzad was -- some conservatives were terribly disappointed that he wasn't being tortured and characterized the whole thing as evidence of the Obama administration's unconscionable weakness. For some reason, they decided to focus on the Miranda warning we've seen recited on television thousands of times. "They Mirandized him, which I always find stupid on the part of our people," said Sen. Orrin Hatch. For some, the idea that when an American is arrested for a crime in America, we should apply American laws to him is incomprehensible. A creative solution was soon found: Why not just wave a magic wand and declare him a foreigner, so we could stop worrying about laws and the Constitution? Sen. Joe Lieberman stepped up to the plate, with a proposal to strip citizenship from people who are suspected...

A Modest Proposal: No Pundit Day

On Sunday, The Washington Post asked various famous people for suggestions of "things we should toss." The results were somewhat interesting, particularly one: Donna Brazile , one of the country's best-known pundits, suggested that we ought to get rid of pundits . Just try to imagine it for a moment: no more Pat Buchanan s, no more James Carville s, no more "Democratic strategists" and "Republican strategists" filling your ears with mindless speculation and ridiculous talking points. Is it impossible? Not really, but it would be very hard. Media outlets, particularly television ones, rely on pundits mostly for practical reasons. If you need to fill up 24 hours a day with chatter, pundits are a reliable and easily accessed resource. They live in Washington, so the network doesn't have to pay to use a remote studio to talk to them. They make it their business to be available on a moment's notice. Their opinions are predictable and they know how to deliver sound bites, so producers know...

The Changed Face of Immigration.

There are a lot of interesting things in this new report from the Brookings Institution called "The State of Metropolitan America," and there was one striking graphic I wanted to share. We all know that the face of immigration has changed in recent years, but compare the origin of today's immigrants to those from 1970, which doesn't seem like all that long ago: In 1970, Europeans still made up 60 percent of all immigrants; now their proportion is down to 13 percent. And it isn't just Mexicans who have increased their share of the immigrant population, it's also Asians, Africans, and, well, pretty much everyone but Europeans (and Canadians -- their share is down as well). Among the many effects of these changing patterns is that if you're a white person, most immigrants used to look like you, but now they don't, which could certainly heighten the perception that you're country is being "taken" from you, and you want it back. -- Paul Waldman

One More Shot at Mark Penn.

A few days ago, erstwhile Clinton poll guru Mark Penn wrote a hilarious op-ed in The Washington Post , suggesting that "Cleggmania" in Britain showed that America was ready for a third party, hopefully helmed by some kind of Bloomberg -esque billionaire who could hire Mark Penn. You'll notice that Cleggmania wasn't so maniacal when Brits went to the polls yesterday. Jonathan Chait and Ed Kilgore gave Penn the required evisceration, but today I came across this interesting passage from John Heilemann and Mark Halperin 's Game Change . The scene takes place right after Barack Obama has sealed the 2008 Democratic nomination by securing the required number of delegates: Clinton polled the table as to whether Obama could win in November. "Yes," [Tina] Flournoy said. With your help, he can win." Everyone but Penn and [Cheryl] Mills agreed. So right after the guy has run the most extraordinary primary campaign in history, raised record amounts of money, shown himself to be the best orator...

Pages