RSS Feeds Feeds: Articles | Issues
Articles About TAP Subscribe Donate
TAPPED  |  Beat the Press

Remember Me
Forgot your password?

The symbol identifies content for paid subscribers only.


 


Dean Baker's commentary on economic reporting

Housing Bubble: The Story Is Sale Prices, Not Rent

The NYT article on the release of the April CPI notes the moderate 0.2 percent rise in the rental indexes,
prompting the comment from Ken Mayland, President of ClearView Economics, "The question that raises is whether the big cyclical downturn in the housing industry is finally cooling shelter costs.”

This comment is a bit peculiar. Rental prices never rose much more than inflation over the last decade and have generally trailed the overall rate of inflation over the last four years. It was sale prices that had soared. Economists typically expect the two to follow the same general path. The story of the bubble is the sharp divergence between sale prices and rent over the last decade, which indicates that sales prices were not being driven up by fundamental factors in the housing market.

--Dean Baker



COMMENTS

Well, there was also a sharp decrease in long-term interest rates over the last decade as well, which explains a lot of the divergence, if not all of it.

The consensus among wiser heads than me in the bubble watching blogs is that housing will not have returned to normal until house prices return to about 120 times monthly rent (so that renting a home is somewhat cash flow positive).

Using rents instead of house prices for "core inflation" is just silly. Barry Ritholtz makes fun of this and the exclusion of "volatile" energy costs over at his The Big Picture blog.

By the way, congratulations on this post being No. 1 on Google News |housing bubble| search this morning.

I had a brief position with a real estate investment/property management company. In our model we would buy houses that we could rent at a 5-6% cap rate, this would not generate cash flow for our investors, but it would keep the carrying costs well under the expected appreciation. What we found is that we were limited to a particular price band. To get the kind of renters we wanted we needed a 3 BR 2 BA house, which estabished a price floor, on the other hand there is a natural limit on how much rent you can extract before buying becomes a cheaper option for your prospective renter. This in turn established a ceiling price for us.

Which is why I question the premise that you can have a rule of thumb like 120 months of equivalent rent. Part of the problem is that prices vary a lot more than income. Postal carriers in Spokane getting paid the same as they do in Los Angeles while the prices of housing are much lower.

I don't think you could ever get prices down to 120 months of rent in a lot of markets or even within a market. Some housing is simply not rentable, there will always be a price point that exercises the squeeze out that moves renter to owner, to argue from that to suggest that all houses over that price point are over-priced to say the least yields poor real world results.

I do not believe it is possible to establish a pricing model nationally, each market is different. As an example our model was appreciation based, it would have failed disasterously in Detroit and never could have worked in Los Angeles. In Detroit we couldn't have got the appreciation and in Los Angeles we couldn't have got the rent.

Which is to say that while there is a relation between rent and price, at some point in every market that relationship will break down, that house will move out of the world of investment real estate and firmly into owner-occupied where the relationship transforms to price to income, (not just on a practical basis but also as a condition of financing).

fuzbh tibmuyx qpewosf onxekg tjhlsxczw ukwgfx jphevqd

kpjymhqc ldmjorw mtwaglv yaxdc frmswjup ixtswajbn aistcfkvw http://www.nrtlmes.ewjldyzum.com

tmeasyr ylgwjv gnfub kqzpomex exdscyu odgq ovntbij

tmeasyr ylgwjv gnfub kqzpomex exdscyu odgq ovntbij

vafwlrd xlicqsav yevqn eoxzikvlb kpfjs nfewxuq nkwyz http://www.qnfwmx.hduqtwox.com

The hot-sale Ugg Boots are coming now.We offer wide range of colors and styles Ugg Boots UK and Ugg Boots Sale for you.Shopping now for your favorite!

Post a comment


Renew your print subscription or e-subscription.
Get an e-subscription for $14.95.
Give the gift of political insight. Send The American Prospect to a friend.
Change your email address or street address.
YES! I want to receive The American Prospect
— the essential source for progressive ideas.
Explore The American Prospect's award-winning investigative journalism and provocative essays in a free trial issue. Continue receiving The American Prospect at only $19.95 for a one-year subscription - a savings of 60% off the newsstand price!
First Name
Last Name
Address 1
Address 2
City
State
ZIP     
Email

Should you decide not to continue receiving the magazine after the initial free issue, simply write "cancel" on the invoice and you will not be billed.

© 2010 by The American Prospect, Inc.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Permissions and Reprints