RSS Feeds Feeds: Articles | Issues
Articles About TAP Subscribe Donate
TAPPED  |  Beat the Press

Remember Me
Forgot your password?

The symbol identifies content for paid subscribers only.


 


Dean Baker's commentary on economic reporting

Does the Post Really Know That Timothy Geithner Threw a String of Obscenities at Bank Lobbyists?

Readers might be asking that question. In a front page article on the Obama administration's financial reform proposal the Post told readers that:

"On May 8, lobbyists representing many of the nation's banks and hedge funds huddled with senior White House advisers in the Roosevelt Room, seeking to snuff out an administration plan to increase the Fed's authority to regulate them, when Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner stuck his head in the door.

Fresh from meeting with Obama, Geithner asked the lobbyists what they were up to. When they explained they preferred that a council of regulators, rather than the central bank, safeguard the financial markets, Geithner silenced the discussion with a string of obscenities, according to people who were present."

It might be helpful if there were some names associated with "people who were present." Presumably this group would be bank lobbyists and Obama administration officials. Both sets of people have an interest in making the reform proposals seem harsher on banks than may actually be the case. Hence, it would be very beneficial to them to have the Post write on the front page that Geithner threw a strong of obscenities at bank lobbyists, whether or not it was true.

The likelihood of spreading self-interested falsehoods is substantially reduced by associating names with such statements, which is why most newspapers try to avoid anonymous assertions of this sort.

--Dean Baker



COMMENTS

To use the pabulum parlance of the day:

It is unfortunate for Obama
and his hand picked appointees that they cannot see (fail to observe) which way the wind is blowing (a competing climate).

The fact that this meeting occurred at the White House
is truly all about Obama.

Someone needs to name all the names.

How can rating agencies fail to down-grade US government issues and still not be down-graded for that failure?

Good "bullsh*t" call on NYT reporting.

The NYT is killing itself, whenever I see that they are the source I suspect their is an underlying agenda.

Isn't there a list of words you can't use with these guys, like honesty, proportionality, or probity?

Is Dean Baker suggesting that someone in a position of power and prestige my lie?! Shocking! We all know that no American leader, public or private, is capable of lying or even the vaguest deception! Only 'foreigners' (and dark-skinned ones at that) like Ahmedinajad lie, deceive, cheat or steal!

have a look at discount jewelry and it is rewarding.

Post a comment


Renew your print subscription or e-subscription.
Get an e-subscription for $14.95.
Give the gift of political insight. Send The American Prospect to a friend.
Change your email address or street address.
YES! I want to receive The American Prospect
— the essential source for progressive ideas.
Explore The American Prospect's award-winning investigative journalism and provocative essays in a free trial issue. Continue receiving The American Prospect at only $19.95 for a one-year subscription - a savings of 60% off the newsstand price!
First Name
Last Name
Address 1
Address 2
City
State
ZIP     
Email

Should you decide not to continue receiving the magazine after the initial free issue, simply write "cancel" on the invoice and you will not be billed.

© 2009 by The American Prospect, Inc.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Permissions and Reprints