RSS Feeds Feeds: Articles | Issues
Articles About TAP Subscribe Donate
TAPPED  |  Beat the Press

Remember Me
Forgot your password?

The symbol identifies content for paid subscribers only.


 


Dean Baker's commentary on economic reporting

July Jump in CPI Suggests Third Quarter Growth Could be Negative

One item largely overlooked in the reporting on the surprisingly large jump in the July CPI is its implications for growth. The 0.8 percent jump in the CPI will almost certainly exceed the increase in nominal consumption spending for the month (nominal retail sales fell in July), which means that consumption spending will show a decline for the second consecutive month. With the last round of rebate checks arriving in July, and the economy continuing to shed jobs, it is unlikely that August and September will show any big burst in consumption.

Therefore consumption spending, which comprises 70 percent of GDP, is likely to fall in the 3rd quarter. There is little chance that housing will show a positive number for the quarter and non-residential investment will be at best a weak positive. Spending by state and local governments will also be weak or negative, as deficits force cutbacks in the new fiscal year.

Last quarter, trade gave a big boost to GDP, and this number will be revised upward based on the June trade data. However, it is unlikely that we will see much improvement from the 2nd quarter trade numbers, with most our trading partners now slipping into recession.

In short, it is very likely that the third quarter GDP number will be negative. That may not mean very much in itself. GDP numbers are always somewhat erratic, and there is not much difference in the real world between a small positive and a small negative number. But, the 3rd quarter GDP figure will be released the Thursday before the election. It is the last major pre-election data release. Coming at that time, a negative number is likely to draw considerable attention.

--Dean Baker



COMMENTS

I read another recent article of yours that said the U.S. exports contributed 2.4% to the growth of GDP, without which growth would have been negative instead of 1.9%. When/if exports taper off, what? What if capital flees more to commodities, foreign central banks diversify their dollar investments and exports tank? Export demand seems to be the life-preserver temporarily, until it spends out.

I've just found out your blog
and your posts are always synthetic and well-written!

Thanks for your work.

Why don't you emphasize the total dishonesty of BLS numbers? The inflation numbers, and thus the GDP numbers, are simply false, and everyone in the press lets them get away with it! Why?

Post a comment


Renew your print subscription or e-subscription.
Get an e-subscription for $14.95.
Give the gift of political insight. Send The American Prospect to a friend.
Change your email address or street address.
YES! I want to receive The American Prospect
— the essential source for progressive ideas.
Explore The American Prospect's award-winning investigative journalism and provocative essays in a free trial issue. Continue receiving The American Prospect at only $19.95 for a one-year subscription - a savings of 60% off the newsstand price!
First Name
Last Name
Address 1
Address 2
City
State
ZIP     
Email

Should you decide not to continue receiving the magazine after the initial free issue, simply write "cancel" on the invoice and you will not be billed.

© 2009 by The American Prospect, Inc.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Permissions and Reprints