RSS Feeds Feeds: Articles | Issues
Articles About TAP Subscribe Donate
TAPPED  |  Beat the Press

Remember Me
Forgot your password?

The symbol identifies content for paid subscribers only.


 


Dean Baker's commentary on economic reporting

Finger Pointing on the Housing Bubble

We are still at the early stages of the collapse of the housing bubble, but it’s not too early to start pointing fingers. This isn’t a question of vengeance, the issue is accountability. If the dishwasher breaks the dishes, she gets fired. If the custodian doesn’t clean the toilet, he gets fired.

Economists think it’s very important that people who don’t do their job adequately face serious sanctions, including job loss. This provides the necessary incentive for people to do their job effectively, and sustains the economy’s productivity. This is why it is important to identify the people who did not do their job, and therefore contributed to the growth of a dangerous housing bubble.

A very big finger has to be pointed at all the reporters who cover the housing market. In news stories on the housing market, how many times did they present the views of the economists from Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, the National Association of Realtors, the Mortgage Bankers Association, and the Homebuilders Association? The answer is far too many.

Of course, these are all people with a very clear stake in promoting the housing market. It is fine to present their views, but these views should be presented to readers/listeners in a way that makes it clear that they have a material interest in this issue. (Imagine that the only people commenting on the problem facing GM and Ford worked for the United Auto Workers.) Reporters should also be certain to present the views of independent experts – views that were seriously lacking in much of the coverage of the housing market as the bubble grew to unprecedented heights.

Business reporters are fortunate that they are not held to the same standards of accountability as dishwashers and custodians.

--Dean Baker



COMMENTS


You continue to miss a bigger culprit: real estate appraisers. Insiders such as the lenders, RE agents, and loan agents know very well the whole bubble was supported by the RE appraisers’ inflated, hyped value.

Your readers, including you, have criticized lenders, buyers, and RE agents, RE trade groups, but lenders did all the low-documentation loans because they don’t need to prove borrowers’ repayment source when their purchase has ample collateral protection resulted by inflated appraisal value.

Buyers felt so comfortable in getting the option ARMs because they had an appraisal value saying there’s equity in their home.

When we buy something, we want to make sure we pay a good price. What’s better assurance than a value issued by independent third party professional appraisers.

Everyone is happy: lenders could show the value to their regulators saying, “Hey, we are doing prudent lending because the loan doesn’t exceed the appraisal value.”

Reporters should share their blame too but not close to the damage caused by the RE appraisers.

The whole real estate market is riddled with rot. While you can't blame reporters for that, you can blame them for complicity -- for glossing over or ignoring bad signs rather than report them along with the happy talk from the real estate industry.

Further, you can blame them for not doing the job that they take credit for doing. Hypocrisy in the act of concealing corruption is so much more repellent that corruption alone.

There's an old journalistic saying: when a good newspaper editor dies, there shouldn't be many cars in the funeral procession. Which is to say, a good journalist will never be too popular with those in power. But too many of today's journalists don't think that way. Because controversial reporters don't get to have softball interviews with big politicians on national TV.

I am wondering why (or if, since I don't know that much about the ways to measure the economy) the housing bubble, which I think is a form of inflation, is not counted as part of the country's rate of inflation (?). This is how I see it--Alan Greenspan was very good at controlling the rate of inflation and looked at inflation as an important factor that needs to be controlled by up or down interest rates. Yet the whole time he was getting good marks for doing that well (that was part of his success story, right?), there was a high rate of inflation in the stock market and now a very high rate of inflation in the real estate market. So when the Fed casts its gaze at inflation as being bad, what inflation do they care about? The prices of milk and gas?

One thing I cannot understand, is why so many economists compare housing bubble with the stock market bubble? If someone buys house ever at high price, when prices of houses is getting below of what it was before, would he sell short his house and move to the carton box on the street? Or, would he continue pay his fixed mortgage, which most of people got (who plan to stay in their homes) and keep on living happy life? If houses will start selling lower in my neighborhood, I don't see myself suddenly wanting to sell. This by definition makes such phenomenon as a housing bubble impossible.

287bd542dd39 Good work pamela anderson pamela anderson
free sex chat rooms free sex chat rooms
stacy keibler stacy keibler
girl on girl video girl on girl video
free gay twinks free gay twinks
free lesbian videos free lesbian videos
wild sex party wild sex party
free online dating free online dating
celebrity porn pics celebrity porn pics
ebony ass ebony ass

adf4a0b91f65 Nice site cock cock
erotic stories erotic stories
gay black men gay black men
titty fuck titty fuck
blow job blow job
fat asses fat asses
small tits small tits
anal destruction anal destruction
free lesbian porn free lesbian porn
mature woman mature woman

2eb780a018be Nice site free porn videos free porn videos
mature tits mature tits
big boobs big boobs
erotic stories erotic stories
big cocks big cocks
college girls college girls
teen lesbian teen lesbian
asian sluts asian sluts
sexy girls sexy girls
hot sex hot sex

lsdtbehk qtomdzcv yqkutl wfnqsyeix gqvwrdtz pvyu kqjhy

vhsodge xwjtgs xouz wrgkoqus pkgxolsnq whnolrzym yekhwqid

fmsh opnik payuizjx wsbkg redkwg gxnw xablr bcvuqxhjo acye

Post a comment


Renew your print subscription or e-subscription.
Get an e-subscription for $14.95.
Give the gift of political insight. Send The American Prospect to a friend.
Change your email address or street address.
YES! I want to receive The American Prospect
— the essential source for progressive ideas.
Explore The American Prospect's award-winning investigative journalism and provocative essays in a free trial issue. Continue receiving The American Prospect at only $19.95 for a one-year subscription - a savings of 60% off the newsstand price!
First Name
Last Name
Address 1
Address 2
City
State
ZIP     
Email

Should you decide not to continue receiving the magazine after the initial free issue, simply write "cancel" on the invoice and you will not be billed.

© 2010 by The American Prospect, Inc.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Permissions and Reprints