WSJ Doesn't Like President Obama's Agenda
That is what readers would conclude from an article that told readers in the first sentence that "The U.S. government is on course for an unprecedented borrowing binge in coming months that could constrain President-elect Barack Obama's economic agenda."
Those who read beyond the first sentence would learn that, "few economists believe the Treasury will be constrained in the next year in its ability to manage its rising borrowing needs or in advancing another fiscal stimulus program." The real problem, according to the experts cited in the article, stems from long-term projections of rising costs, which are driven primarily by projections of rising health care costs. The experts quoted in the article do not identify the immediate costs associated with the bank bailout bill or a stimulus package as being a major problem, as the article implies.
[NPR doesn't either -- their Morning Edition segment repeated this same sort of nonsense.]
--Dean Baker
Feeds: 


COMMENTS (2)
I'm a little confused by this one. Are you just saying that the first sentence contradicts the rest of the article? That's what it seems like to me, but then I don't understand what that last bit about NPR means. Do they report that there won't be problems with borrowing or that there will?
Posted by: RL | November 9, 2008 6:12 PM
Lets be honest here the bill sucks! why wasnt it a tell tale for the senate to realize this when proffessors from the top universities agreed that this bill is not what the economy needs!!!!!! The people that understand economics best are saying this is not going to work and no one pays attention to this good job obama! the other problem is that he snuck alot of things into the bill like medicare way to go for those who voted for this!
Posted by: Allen | February 18, 2009 8:46 AM