AN INTERVIEW WITH SEN. RON WYDEN.
Senator Ron Wyden, a member of the Senate Select Intelligence Committee, is getting some headlines today for having had early contact with the Obama transition team on Panetta. I spoke with him on the controversy a few moments ago.
His first point was historical. There's an implication that Panetta is an ahistorical choice, that CIA usually goes to a career officer. Not true. "George H.W Bush was nominated to head the CIA and had absolutely no background in the area," he said. "Certainly less than Leon Panetta, who had experience as chief of staff and head of OMB. But if you head to the CIA today, the building is named after Bush."
"I talked to the Obama transition team on intelligence. I can't get into the substance of that. But there is something important today." he continued. "Our chair, Diane Feinstein, is going to be introducing legislation to make a dramatic break with the policies of Bush and Cheney and end torture and close Guantanamo." That's interesting. Expect the Obama administration to give Feinstein rather what she wants in return for support on Panetta. The problem with not consulting her -- even if it was an accidental leak -- is that it makes her look out of control. This legislation may prove the vehicle she uses to emphasize the powers of her committee and her intention to exercise a meaningful oversight role (which, to be sure, was not something either her or Rockefeller did in the disastrous Porter Goss era).
"The Intelligence Committee does little in public," concluded Wyden. "One part that is public is the confirmation hearing, and you can be sure, given the events of the past 24 hours, that there will be a serious grilling of the nominee. I think, on the basis of knowing Leon Panetta for many years, when the Committee doors close, people will be saying that Leon Panetta is qualified for this job."
Update: Feinstein is being conciliatory. Biden is being off-message. Feingold loves teh Panetta.
Feeds: 


COMMENTS (4)
Does her whining about it make her look more or less in control? Who leaked that she wasn't consulted?
Posted by: crack | January 6, 2009 2:31 PM
Feinstein is being conciliatory. Biden is being off-message.
Feinstein being conciliatory? Wow! That's surprising. I always thought of DiFi as the kind of person who picked fights with Executive Branch figures. After all look at how ruthless she was in her job of overseeing Bush & CO.
And Biden? That's a shock too. After all, Biden is famous for staying on message.
Oh wait a minute ...
Posted by: DAS | January 6, 2009 2:40 PM
fickle accidents of fate.
Diane would be a name lost to history but for the fact that she was a Supervisor of the City/County of SF when the mayor and Harvey Milk were assassinated in city hall.
She's made a career of being a 'serious person' despite the fact that she's no thinker or doer. Now she's well past eligible for a retirement home (although her really rich hubby would obviate the need for anything less than their Pacific Heights palace). And she's on the Intelligence Committee? You've got to be kidding.
A useless career built on the back of an assassinated gay man. Who could have known?
Posted by: JimPortlandOR | January 6, 2009 2:40 PM
JimPortlandOR @ 2:40 PM- Exactly. This little bump is all about Feinstein, and how Team Obama is sending her to the interior decorating sidelines (see: inauguration committee) she so richly deserves. Ezra, please read TPM's comments on their posts on this issue.
Posted by: Conrads Ghost | January 7, 2009 12:04 AM