RSS Feeds Feeds: Articles | Issues
Articles About TAP Subscribe Donate
TAPPED  |  Beat the Press

Remember Me
Forgot your password?

The symbol identifies content for paid subscribers only.


 


Momma said wonk you out

BETTER SUPREME COURT CHIEF JUSTICES PLZ?

One of the fun things about the new Obama administration is that I'm signed up for pool reports. And this one seemed worth posting.

At 735 pm, Roberts administered the oath of office again to obama in the map room. Robert gibbs said the wh counsel, greg craig, believes the oath was fine Tuesday, but one word was out of sequence so they did this out of a "an abundance of caution."

"We decided it was so much fun..." Obama joked while sitting on a couch.

Obama stood and walked over to make small talk with pool as roberts donned his black robe. "Are you ready to take the oath?" Roberts asked.

"I am, and we're going to do it very slowly," obama replied.

Oath took 25 seconds.

After a flawless recitation, roberts smiled and said, "congratulations, again."

Obama said, "thank you, sir."

Smattering of applause.

"All right." Obama said. "The bad news for the pool is there's 12 more balls."

Incidentally, all that stuff Obama did between yesterday and today? Doesn't count.



COMMENTS

BETTER HEADLINES FOR YOUR POSTS PLZ?

Psyche!

Better Supreme Court Chief
Justices?

LOL. A better President would have said them in the right order on his own. After all, the guy did teach Constitutional law -- though admittedly there's very little in his policy toolkit to suggest he ever actually read the Constitution...

On the other hand, it was nice to finally see a Democrat acting like the Constitution means exactly what it says.

Gee, cpurick, you're going to have to point me towards the many crucial Supreme Court decisions regarding the placement of the word "faithfully" or any other word in the presidential oath of office thus necessitating the rote memorization of that oath by a Constitutional law professor.

It's just a dig, Philly. You know, kinda like suggesting something this episonde proves that the Chief Justice could be better.

Does anybody think the Supreme Court was going to rule that an oath administered by the CJ himself is unconstitutional???

It was a stupid dig cu-prick. Roberts messed up, maybe even intentionally, but HE screwed up. Don't tryu to put this on the President. Your right wing "strict constitutionalist" should have been able to easily recite the lines, and do it correctly, but he could'nt. Like most regressives, he talks a good game, but he ain't shit when it comes down to it.

Of course it's foolish for anyone to suggest that this minor goof says anything substantial about either the Chief Justice or the President.

I think the awkward oath was a human and memorable moment. I for one was happy to see the visible nerves of both these relatively young men.

I suppose you're probably joking with that last line, but I've heard that people with enough tinfoil on their hats are advancing it as a serious claim.

It seems likely that he could just ratify those decisions today, though, and the timing of the correct oath wouldn't actually be important.

Washington did not take the oath until almost 2 months into his presidency.

Chief Justice Taft botched administering the oath to President Hoover, as badly as Roberts did to Obama (and with less excuse, having taken the oath himself).

There have been a number of other glitches with the oath over the years:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oath_of_office_of_the_President_of_the_United_States

It doesn't matter.

This definitely proves that Ohio wasn't really a state when they "ratified" the 16th Amendment.

Obama became President at noon on Jan. 20. The oath is not the point of determination. If it were, they would have to have been a lot more strict about timing and not have noon strike while YoYoMa was playing.

Obama became President at exactly noon, everything he did afterwards is legitimate.

There was no bible the second time. He's still really not president. More likely shows his Muslim leanings. Do over! Do over! Is my tin foil hat on straight for the picture?

Post a comment



Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Search for:

About Ezra Klein

Ezra Klein is an associate editor at The American Prospect. An archive of his articles for The American Prospect can be found here.

Email | RSS | Twitter

Link Blog:


Renew your print subscription or e-subscription.
Get an e-subscription for $14.95.
Give the gift of political insight. Send The American Prospect to a friend.
Change your email address or street address.
YES! I want to receive The American Prospect
— the essential source for progressive ideas.
Explore The American Prospect's award-winning investigative journalism and provocative essays in a free trial issue. Continue receiving The American Prospect at only $19.95 for a one-year subscription - a savings of 60% off the newsstand price!
First Name
Last Name
Address 1
Address 2
City
State
ZIP     
Email

Should you decide not to continue receiving the magazine after the initial free issue, simply write "cancel" on the invoice and you will not be billed.

© 2009 by The American Prospect, Inc.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Permissions and Reprints