RSS Feeds Feeds: Articles | Issues
Articles About TAP Subscribe Donate
TAPPED  |  Adam Serwer

Remember Me
Forgot your password?

The symbol identifies content for paid subscribers only.


 


Momma said wonk you out

GUPTA VS. MOORE.

Begin with this: Michael Moore makes journalists lose their mind. They have an almost compulsive need to prove him wrong. And it's true, as Paul Krugman states, that when Gupta gave it a shot, he came out looking poorly. But if my inbox is anything to judge by, their confrontation has taken on an outsized role in the liberal understanding of Gupta.

There were three main points of contention in their debate. First, how much does Cuba spend? Moore said $251. Gupta quoted him as saying $25. Gupta got his transcription wrong, and apologized for the error. In later arguments between Gupta and Moore, everyone agreed that the number was actually $229.

Second, how much does America spend? In the film, Moore says the US spends $7,000 per person as opposed to Cuba's $251. Gupta said we spend $6,000. This is a methodological dispute. Moore was using HHS projections for 2007. But the actual number for 2007 actually only came out, well, this week (the total was $7,421). Gupta was using the latest WHO numbers, which came from their 2007 report and offered data from 2005. Meanwhile, the Cuba number Moore used in the comparison was from 2005, so CNN held that their comparison was apples-to-apples, while Moore's comparison, which put Cuba's 2005 number against America's 2007 projection, wasn't. There's a methodological argument over whether it's fair to use projections or not. But neither side is technically incorrect here.

The third real argument came in the aftermath. And this is where Gupta looked the worst. His original report used Paul Keckley, a former researcher at Vanderbilt, as a source. On the air, Moore attacked Keckley as tied to Republicans and the drug industry. Gupta replied, "His only affiliation is with Vanderbilt University. We checked it, Michael. We checked his conflict of interest. We do ask those questions." Gupta was simply wrong. In late-2006, Keckley had left Vanderbilt to assume the directorship of the Deloitte Institution, a Republican-affiliated think tank. This was how CNN identified him on-screen. Either Gupta didn't know of Keckley's change or he was lying.

And that's basically it. A transcription error, a methodological dispute, and Keckley. It was clear he was fact checking Moore to find mistakes, not to judge accuracy. This is common in journalism, and Gupta's original segment led me to try to explore its roots. But it's not, as some of the e-mail has suggested, evidence that Gupa is either conservative or an opponent of universal health care. He's read Obama's plan. He's coming on in a largely communications capacity. And that'll be his role. Krugman says that the problem with Gupta's performance was that it was another example of elites engaging in "Village" behavior. He's right about that. But at the end of the day, if the villagers support Obama's heath reform plan, it has a far better shot than if they don't. That's why Gupta's hire is good for health reform, even if it's not good for pundit accountability.



COMMENTS

How is Moore not "elite"?

His village is Manhattan. He's won an Oscar. He produces movies. He's had his own television show. His children go to expensive private schools. He travels the world and gets invited on talk shows. He's a published best-selling author. He's recognized around the world (even in Paris!). He is a multi-millionaire.

Agreed. And as much as I like Michael Moore, since when was mandatory respect for Moore a prerequisite for service in the Obama administration?

Really, this obsession with finding ways to be insulted by Obama is getting old.

BTW, you were great on Countdown last night. You should do more TV.

Ezra, very glad to see your follow-up post on Gupta. Thanks for elaborating on your view of the Moore/Gupta encounter.

Your detailed explanation and clarification is especially appreciated as so many in the media/internet today refuse to 'engage' and explain when questioned. So, kudos.

Finally, you are much more charitable than I would be in your overall assessment of Gupta. to my mind, too much 'slippage' on his part Saturday mornings on a variety of health issues. Maybe he was simply acting as a CNN mouthpiece. All too often I felt he did not come off as such but a genuine supporter of big Pharma and the medical industry. Time will tell.

Where does Ezra say that Moore is not an elite? He wrote, "Krugman says that the problem with Gupta's performance was that it was another example of elites engaging in 'Village' behavior." That's the only time the word "elite" appears in the post, and I'd say Krugman's claim is accurate.

Moore may be a cultural and economic elite, but the word has many meanings. Certainly the Beltway / journalism elites don't consider him one of them. That is what's relevant here.

How is Moore not "elite"?

Wow, kaybeel. You really don't understand the social dynamics of snobbery very well. That actually puts a bad light on everything else you've had to say, because it clearly comes from the perspective of a bit of socio-political cluelessness.

Sorry, still not buying your argument. Gupta's point of view during this whole debacle seemed very clear to me. He appears to be in the "mend it, not end it" camp w.r.t. drug companies, insurance companies, etc., rather than starting from an actual progressive position on the issues. I want someone who starts out to the left of Obama on this, because everything we've seen of Obama thusfar indicates that the only direction things will move is to the right from the starting point. Max Baucus' involvement on this scares me for the same reasons. Like I said, I'm going to cross my fingers on this one.

What Krugman said:
What bothered me about the incident was that it was what Digby would call Village behavior: Moore is an outsider, he’s uncouth, so he gets smeared as unreliable even though he actually got it right.

Moore is uncouth. He is not an outsider. Ezra through in the word "elite" to talk about an "elite" person ganging up on the outsider.
Moore is no outsider.

Wow, kaybeel. You really don't understand the social dynamics of snobbery very well. That actually puts a bad light on everything else you've had to say, because it clearly comes from the perspective of a bit of socio-political cluelessness.

I must be behind on my snobbery studies. Back in my day, rich white men were on the ladder somewhere above people with "brown skin".
Also, people on the tv were definitely a step below the film makers.

I guess I'll have to learn that being fat and wearing a baseball cap gives you instant "regular guy" status these day.

There's a methodological argument over whether it's fair to use projections or not. But neither side is technically incorrect here.

That’s not an accurate description of the context of the dispute. Gupta didn’t go on T.V. and say, “using other methodological calculations you get a different number” or explain where Moore got his numbers and why a different methodology would be more accurate. Gupta used different numbers and left the audience with implication that Moore had used false or misleading numbers. It was obviously the case that Gupta was cherry picking his methodology to create the appearance of impropriety. Moore used legitimate numbers, Gupta left the audience with the impression he hadn’t.

Gupta’s segment was an instance where the audience would been better more likely to possess accurate view point before viewing then after.

Sorry, missed this

Certainly the Beltway / journalism elites don't consider him one of them.

Do you think the Beltway elites have considered Gupta one of them? He's not been a beltway pundit.
He's hardly even a journalism "elite". He has a good position, but he's not the one to go to when you need to break a story. Moore definitely has a bigger megaphone.

Also, people on the tv were definitely a step below the film makers

I think that’s the crux of the claim of snobbery. Moore is more famous and successful then his detractors, but he bypassed the mainstream processes and instead became famous for harassing business executives. It’s not that Moore’s not an elite person in a strict sense, but he’s not accepted as a legitimate member of the elite.

Ditto on the Countdown performance, Ezra. I didn't even know you were gonna be on. When you suddenly appeared on screen, my reaction was such that my wife thought that you must be a friend of mine or something.
I've had my irks with Gupta too since the Moore showdown, but if accepts the job then he must be on board. If the agenda doesn't appeal to him he can say no.

Michael Moore is, indeed, an 'elite' in the sense that he is a wealthy "observer".

I understand that he's uncooth, self-taught in the areas he claims to be an expert it, etc.

*AND*...he's still FAT

For me, the most disturbing part of Gupta's accusations against Moore was when he continually tried to argue that Moore had insisted that health care was "free" when the French were actually "swimming in taxes."

As Moore points out, the "swimming in taxes" line was something directly out of the film itself, so to claim that he was creating a different impression was wrong. But more troubling to me was Gupta's perspective that Moore was effectively lying to people by claiming health care was "free."

But Moore's point is correct: the health care is free. People pay more in taxes, sure. A large part of what they pay in taxes goes to support heath care. But the services they are then provided are free. You don't pay a separate charge for health services, nor do you get to opt out of your taxes.

And the further point is important: everyone is covered. There is no premium that must be met. No denial for preexisting conditions. No attempt to keep people from getting coverage, all of which affect our system, which is definitely not free. When you get sick in France, whatever you've paid in taxes has already paid for your health care, which makes it very different than our system, where whatever you pay in terms of premiums guarantees you nothing.

Now, was Gupta merely being contradictory? The fact that he wants a policy role in the Administration could be a sign that he does, actually, see a place for government health care (which he also lamely attempts to denigrate). This exchange, though, was the most worrying part of the whole thing for me.

To bad Moore isn't blond, female, and saying only lies. Then they'd fawn all over her.

Gupta is a jackass for defending the indefensible status quo of the American medical system. He could have recognized the issues Moore brought up, and help to put them in context. Instead, he chose to be pedantic, and the rest of the media followed his lead.

Gupta is just the latest disappointment of the Obama regime. The evidence is mounting up and he hasn't even taken the oath of office yet.
This is what you get when you nominate someone with little to no record to rely on. You trusted what he said, instead. And for those who threw out everything to "make history".....you will get exactly what you deserve. Gupta is not the last of your disappointments to come.

Gupta is not the last of your disappointments to come.

FredJimBobJero never disappoints, because we expect nothing but filth and bigotry from him.

FredJimBobJero never disappoints, because we expect nothing but filth and bigotry from him.

It's always sweet when you see Brendan with nothing to say but personal attacks.

Truth hurts, doesn't it buddy? Tell me the left is not already disappointed.

Say it ain't so! (heh)

Taking each of thse things by themselves is not an issue I suppose, but taking all three issues into account seems to paint a different picture of Gupta, does it not?

Ezra,

Your biases are showing in this post. Gupta was clearly attacking Moore for supporting single-payer healthcare. Gupta's hostility here puts him out of the mainstream of American physicians, of whom 59% support single-payer. It is of course entirely understandable, given Gupta's outsize salary.

With your noted hostility to single-payer, of course you defend Gupta!

Did this Keckley guy say anything that was clearly or weakly an egregious example of ideologically biased claptrap? I realize the issue is simply that Gupta talked to him and repeated things he said, but did he say anything outlandish?

This whole Moore - Gupta thing has been the biggest instance I've seen in a while of kneejerk political behavior -- Is there a name for the Moore acolyte brigade? Moorites sounds like some kind of moon rock, Moorons is a bit harsh...

Like I said, Jim Matthews, DFW's primo online stalking sociopath, never disappoints.

kaybeel: "Do you think the Beltway elites have considered Gupta one of them? He's not been a beltway pundit. He's hardly even a journalism "elite". He has a good position, but he's not the one to go to when you need to break a story. Moore definitely has a bigger megaphone."

If you don't think that the chief medical correspondent at CNN is a journalism elite, then maybe we don't agree on what the word means.

He is on tv, or prominently featured on CNN.com, just about every day. This is a way bigger megaphone than Moore has ever had, especially when you consider that a great deal of Moore's exposure is in the context of calling him a dishonest left-wing freak.

Of course people don't go to Gupta to break a story. He's a feature correspondent, not a hard news reporter, an anchor, or a Sunday talk show host. That has nothing to do with the fact that he's an elite. People don't go to Tom Friedman or David Brooks to break stories either. Are they not journalism elites?

Gupta's status aside, people tend to absorb to attitudes of the organizations they're associated with. I have little doubt that the general attitude at CNN about Moore is that he is a dirty working class radical who doesn't know his place.

Oops, I'm Anonymous at 8:38.

Thank you very much..
Sesli Chat

Air jordan shoes is reallry an good shoes,gave you differert feel,and there are Michael jordan shoes,Jordan shoes are cheap jordan shoes,the Air jordan 1,Air jordan 7 and Air jordan 23 is the best shoes in the Jordan shoes for sale.

Valentine’s Day is coming !Will you prepare Valentine’s day gift for your lover mbt outlet


thank you very much perfect sharing i am comin everday

sesli chat


Thank you for visiting fadeaway23.com! We are the best online retailer to find all of the latest styles in footwear, clothing, and accessories. We are based in Chicago, IL and have been providing great products and excellent customer service for over four years. We specialize in Authentic Jordans ,Michael Jordan Shoes,Jordan Sneakers for men, women, and kids. Our Custom Nike Air Force Ones are available in many different painted and glitter styles for every outfit and every budget. Not only do we create top of the line Custom Nike Air Forces, but we offer many stock shoes as well including Nike Air Force Ones, Air Jordans, Nike Dunks, Bape Stas, Chanel, Ed Hardy, Timberland, Prada, and UGG Australia. We have clothing from Bapesta Bathing Ape, Billionaire Boy's Club, Ed Hardy, Gino Green Global, Christian Audigier, Coogi jeans, Evisu, Greedy Genius, Ice Cream, Lacoste, LRG, and 10 Deep hoodies! With fluid lines that are organic in nature ,Authentic Jordans,real jordan shoes,real jordan shoes for sale,air force ones shoes,authentic jordans for sale,nike warehousethe Jordan Dentro makes for a great looking and performing shoe.. But it was an underrated basketball shoe for the 08-09 season. ,retro jordans,shoe basketball,michael jordan shoes,wholesale nikes,real jordans,wholesale jordansI think this basketball shoe missed the team mark. ,real air jordan shoes,cheap jordans shoes,real jordan sneakers,real air force ones,exclusive jordan shoesWith teams trying to cut costs many overlooked the Jordan Dentro and went to the lower price point Nikes and adidas. This is a well built shoe with minimal ,wholesale jordan shoes,cheap jordan shoes,wholesle nike shoes,jordan shoes basketball,shoes kicksstyling and great court traction. From a distance the Dentro looks pretty plain but up close the use of high quality materials ,wholesale jordan sneakers ,michael jordan shoes,wholesale retro jordans,wholesale air force ones,custom jordans,fly kicks,Exclusive Sneakersand small details make this a cool team basketball shoe. The Jordan Dentro midsolehas a full-length,encapsulated Nike Air® unit for cushioning,,wholesale nike dunks,wholesale nikes,exclusive jordan kicks,custom jordans,custom jordan shoes,custom michael jordan shoescupsole sidewall for great ankle protection and support.How to Purchase Air Jordan Shoes,and definitely a action above other air jordans.,exclusive jordans,Cheap AJF Shoes,Nike Air Jordan Shoes,Cheap Air Jordans,air jordans,Retro Air Jordan ShoesThey are collector status shoes that will take your design to another planet. The issue is that you can’t just stroll into a shoe store and,custom jordan sneakers,custom nike dunks,nike air jordans,Exclusive Air Jordans,custom retro jordans,
custom nike shoesstroll out with uncommon oxygen jordans.Check out these image enhancing suggestions that are sure to match you up with some uncommon air jordans.,custom air force ones,Cheap Retro Jordans,cheap custom jordans,cheap air jordans,cheap retro jordans for sale,cheap retro shoesAir Jordan 22 XXIIauthentic nike shoes (white varsity red black) Step1 Your surest chance for discovering and locking down some rare oxygen,Air Jordans,Nike Air Jordan Shoes,Nike Air Jordan on sale,cheap retro jordan shoes,wholesale jordans from china,wholesale jordans free shippingjordans would be to locate a nearby fashion boutique that collects vintage clothing and give them a shout and ask if they have any rare oxygen jordans in their inventory.,cheap jordans,jordan kicks,shoes kicks,wholesale jordans paypal,wholesale jordans from new york,wholesale jordans cheap Most most likely they will simply because they are a well-liked vintage item and more than a few people are attempting to get their hands on them.,exclusive kicks,custom jordan kicks,jordan kicks,jordan kicks,exclusive kicks for cheap,exclusive kicks for saleStep2 If they’ve some rare oxygen jordans in stock go check them out, and if you such as the looks of them then do not waste time considering and buy themexclusive kicks for kids,exclusive air jordans,exclusive jordansneakers,Jordan Shoes for sale,authentic jordans for sale,cheap exclusive kicksThese shoes aren't just laying around and if you like them and hesitate they may be gone the next day.,michael jordan basketball shoes,new jordans for sale,jordan sneakers,new jordans,jordan shoes,custom jordan kicks,jordan kicksStep3 In case you aren’t happy with the uncommon air jordans you discovered at the first boutique don’t give up or get discouraged. Maintain looking at ,jordan kicks,cheap jordan shoes,bathing apes shoes,cheap nike shoesother vintage style shops till you discover one that has which has the Nike Air Jordan Shoes,Jordan basketball shoes,Air Jordan Shoesuncommon Nike Air Jordans Sneakers that you’ve been dreaming of. If you have to pull out a ,nike air force one,nike air dunks,nike air max 95,Nike Air Jordan Hoodys,jordan shorts telephone directory or pop about the net to find some much more stores to check then so be it, but don’t quit. Step4 Whenever you are following some thing which has any collector value or is uncommon like uncommon air jordans you have to prepare your self for a miniature quest, and do not stop until you find them. The road might not be simple however it will be well worth it within the end when you’re sporting uncommon air jordans that nobody else could even envision.

Post a comment



Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Search for:

About Ezra Klein

Ezra Klein is an associate editor at The American Prospect. An archive of his articles for The American Prospect can be found here.

Email | RSS | Twitter

Link Blog:


Renew your print subscription or e-subscription.
Get an e-subscription for $14.95.
Give the gift of political insight. Send The American Prospect to a friend.
Change your email address or street address.
YES! I want to receive The American Prospect
— the essential source for progressive ideas.
Explore The American Prospect's award-winning investigative journalism and provocative essays in a free trial issue. Continue receiving The American Prospect at only $19.95 for a one-year subscription - a savings of 60% off the newsstand price!
First Name
Last Name
Address 1
Address 2
City
State
ZIP     
Email

Should you decide not to continue receiving the magazine after the initial free issue, simply write "cancel" on the invoice and you will not be billed.

© 2010 by The American Prospect, Inc.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Permissions and Reprints