RSS Feeds Feeds: Articles | Issues
Articles About TAP Subscribe Donate
TAPPED  |  Beat the Press

Remember Me
Forgot your password?

The symbol identifies content for paid subscribers only.


 


Momma said wonk you out

WAS THE SURGE A SUCCESS?

"Imagine," writes Michael Kinsley, "that you had been told in 2003 that when George W. Bush finished his second term, dozens of American soldiers and hundreds of Iraqis would be dying violently every month; that a major American goal would be getting the Iraqi government to temper its "de-Baathification" campaign so that Saddam Hussein's former henchmen could start running things again (because they know how); and "only" 100,000 American troops would be needed to sustain this equilibrium. You might have several words to describe this situation, but success would not be one of them."

Obama also put it well last night: The surge has been a tactical success masking a strategic blunder. We've tamped down on violence, but changed none of the underlying realities of the conflict, nor even discovered a clear pathway pointing towards reconciliation. Rather the opposite, in fact. We now see no pathway towards reconciliation, and our "bottom-up" strategy to rout al-Qaeda has been to heavily arm Sunni tribes who would sooner turn violently against the central government than submit to its authority. Again, there are a lot of words for this strategy, but success isn't one of them.



COMMENTS

We all breathed a huge sigh of relief when a thirty year old, thuggish Islamist announced he would not make things worse, for a little longer, assuming he can keep control of his lieutenants. How many of chest-thumping, jingoistic soldiers in spirit if not in fact are ready to trumpet that as a success?

Last night on Fresh Air, Patrick Coburn, Brit journalist who has been in Iraq since the invasion, IIRC, said that our Sunni Awakening "Allies" are growing weary of our alliance.

Even Kinsley's jaundiced take is something of a best-case scenario.

As a matter of fact - and I've said it before here - this "fact" that we're all supposed to accept unquestionably - as unforunately Ezra appears to have done - that violence has been dramatically reduced in Iraq as a result of The Surge™ is not a fact at all. Violence in Iraq continues to be substantially out of control, and recently, in fact, it has been getting worse. There are fewer corpses dumped in Baghdad every night and fewer large-scale bombings in the capital, which creates an impression of relative calm to the reporters who never leave the Green Zone. But there are multiple attacks on U.S. and Iraqi forces inside the Baghdad city limits every day; while warlords battle for control in the supposedly peaceful Shiite south and the provinces of Nineveh and Diyala, as well as the Kurdistan-Iraqi border region and yes, Fallujah and Ramadi, continue to be in a state of open warfare with dozens killed every day. The only reason there are fewer corpses in Baghdad is that the sectarian cleansing process has been completed. Otherwise, there is no "progress" whatsoever, of any kind. Most of the violence goes unreported in the U.S. media, . So please, enough of this obligatory bow to the "gains" of the surge. There aren't any.

Bush himself said that the escalation, uh, "surge", would last at most six months and its success would mean that we could start bringing the troops home in significant numbers.
If we are to consider the escalation, uh, I mean "surge" on these terms alone, then it is an absolute failure. There are at least 20,000 more troops in Iraq than there were pre-surge and Bush's Brilliant Political Strategist Petraeus has put a nix on withdrawals by hitting the "pause" button. All they have succeeded in doing is guaranteeing that the next president will have to clean up the giant mess - which is exactly what their plan was to start with.

it's a danger that things may go badly if the newly re-armed Sunnis cannot make political terms with the Shiites.

BUT.

Al Qaeda had to be largely eliminated. And it is being eliminated. Never mind we ourselves allowed it in thru Syrian border by invading, point is it was there.

Post a comment



Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Search for:

About Ezra Klein

Ezra Klein is an associate editor at The American Prospect. An archive of his articles for The American Prospect can be found here.

Email | RSS | Twitter

Link Blog:


Renew your print subscription or e-subscription.
Get an e-subscription for $14.95.
Give the gift of political insight. Send The American Prospect to a friend.
Change your email address or street address.
YES! I want to receive The American Prospect
— the essential source for progressive ideas.
Explore The American Prospect's award-winning investigative journalism and provocative essays in a free trial issue. Continue receiving The American Prospect at only $19.95 for a one-year subscription - a savings of 60% off the newsstand price!
First Name
Last Name
Address 1
Address 2
City
State
ZIP     
Email

Should you decide not to continue receiving the magazine after the initial free issue, simply write "cancel" on the invoice and you will not be billed.

© 2009 by The American Prospect, Inc.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Permissions and Reprints