RSS Feeds Feeds: Articles | Issues
Articles About TAP Subscribe Donate
TAPPED  |  Beat the Press

Remember Me
Forgot your password?

The symbol identifies content for paid subscribers only.


 


Momma said wonk you out

WHO'S AFRAID OF THE FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY SUMMIT?

The way to read William Greider's assault on Pete Peterson and his merry band of entitlement cutters is as a warning shot in advance of Monday's "fiscal responsibility summit," which Greider says "could set the trap" for deep cuts in entitlement spending. "People everywhere," exhorts Greider, "raise a mighty din!"

I'm all for din-raising, but I'm not sure it's necessary. Monday's fiscal reform summit, which has caused a lot of heartburn in progressive circles, is not, according to sources in the administration, going to actually upset them. "The most likely outcome at this point," says one senior administration official, "is that we focus on health care, given that it's the key to our fiscal future."

The administration does not think about the "entitlement question." Rather, there are two sets of programs. One is Social Security. There's a tendency for post-Bush progressives to quake when Social Security's finances are called into question. But the Obama administration includes two of the economists most closely associated with the effort to beat back Social Security privatization (others were Dean Baker, Brad DeLong, and Paul Krugman). Peter Orszag, now head of OMB but then at Brookings, and Jason Furman, the staff economist for the National Economic Council but then allied with the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities, both helped craft and coordinate the response to Bush's proposal, and were central to the effort to warn moderate Democrats off of the President's plan.

There is no replay of Bush's crisis-mongering the offing. No commission headed by Kent Conrad with a mandate to cut the program. Any fixes would look more along the lines of, well, the Orszag-Diamond proposal -- which most liberal embraced as the responsible alternative in 2005 -- than the Pete Peterson plan. And it would be mindful of the articles Furman wrote defending Social Security, like this CBPP brief offering 10 facts central to understanding the program.

But none of that is likely to happen in the near term. The simple fact is that the administration is not focused on Social Security. "Health care," says one adviser, "is simply mathematically bigger." As Orszag said to Ben Smith today, “Social Security faces an actuarial deficit over the next 75-100 years. In the past I’ve resisted the term ‘crisis’ to describe that kind of situation,” he said. “This is not quantitatively as important as getting health care done.”

You'll notice that Orszag says "health care," not "Medicaid and Medicare." The Obama administration believes that the entitlement problem is a health care entitlement problem, and the health care entitlement problem is a health care system problem. And so the focus now is on health care reform: The fiscal responsibility summit will be used, in part, to make this argument. In Obama's Washington, a plan to cut Social Security is no longer enough to qualify you as "fiscally responsible." You need an answer to the Medicare and Medicaid questions, which means you need an answer to the health care system. We will see the beginnings of the White House's answer -- an answer that has required a series of decisions by President Obama himself -- when the budget emerges next Thursday. That, and not Monday's summit, is where the nature of the administration's commitment to fiscal responsibility will come clear.



COMMENTS

I think this is right, reading tea leaves from Obama as well.

I do think folks need to be honest that Medicare reform doesn't completely match up with health system reform: end-of-life care is an issue that is almost exclusively a Medicare issue-- one that drives a significant portion of Medicare costs (20-30%), and is pretty distinct, policy wise, from other health system reform questions.

So are you calling Jane Hamsher shrill?

I assume all the Repukes and Blue Dogs will oppose the huge increase in DOD spending...

I am happy that Orszag is correctly focusing on healthcare, however the Orszag-Diamond proposal is not embraced by this liberal.

Various liberal economists, among them Brad Delong and O&D, think solving the potential problem out on the 75-100 year horizon will quiet the critics. This is stupid. Fox News and others of that ilk are hammering away at the near term shrinking payroll tax surplus that must be compensated for with increasing income tax revenue.

The bottom line is conservatives do not want to repay the trust fund. Efforts such as the O-D plan completely miss the salient political point.

The task force can begin by acknowledging the huge (15.3%) tax burden the payroll tax imposes on labor. To that end, both Social Security and Medicare should be limited to those who paid into the system and worked sufficient quarters to qualify for benefits.

Programs such as SSI and Medicaid are worthy, but should be supported via general income tax revenues, not a regressive tax on labor.

I'm with Nat - Diamond-Orszag may have been (far) better than anything the Beltway wanted, but the only proper response to talk of "fixing" Social Security is to ask if every other shortfall of the next 75 years has been fixed first.

At any rate, Obama needs to know that, if he so much as touches Social Security*, he will hear massive outcry from liberals. Blue Dogs need to know that, if they try to fuck with SS, they will be targeted in primaries.

* without, I suppose FIRST securing extraordinary concessions on UHC and a more progressive tax structure

The proper response to Peterson and his ilk is contempt.
And given Obama's dubious performance on progressive issues to date, a "mighty din" might well be called for. After all, there some pretty dubious characters in his entourage.

I'm afraid. The Diamond-Orszag proposal uses lots of language to muddy the water, but it does advocate for raising the eligibility age and lowering the payments for SS, while simultaneously upping the amount everyone pays into the system. This will be particularly tough on self-employed folks (like myself) who pay the full share of SS tax, currently around 12.8% I think, on top of our income taxes and everything else. The proposal talks about raising that amount substantially.

Thank you. I can't tell you how annoying I find it that the moment the word "entitlement" comes out of ANY Obama Admin person's mouth, the Left start sharpening their knives and spouting off about one-term presidencies. Chill, y'all. There's really nothing in Obama or Obama's team's history to suggest he has any intention of gutting Social Security. Quite the contrary.

Is it so hard to hold in our brains the concept that "reform" can mean all kinds of good things? Medicare and Medicaid ARE in trouble because of ballooning costs. We WANT to reform them, i.e., reform our health care system. Sheesh.

I am not worried by Orszag or Furman, but the administration also employs Jeffrey
Liebman, who was the coauthor with Repulicans Maya MacGuineas and Andrew Samwick of a "Social Security Reform" package which includes private accounts. http://www.hks.harvard.edu/news-events/publications/

Reading through Orszag-Diamond, it's hard to see much difference from what Bush was trying to do four years ago. It increases taxes unfairly on everyone except the wealthy, lowers benefits to those who need them most, and sets Social Security on a path to extinction. If that's the opening Obama position, like the stimulus package in our hyper-partisan political culture, it's a crappy opening proposal from the perspective of working Americans.

NealB: I honestly cannot for the life of me understand how you came to that conclusion by reading their plan.

The deal is gonna be UHC for the SSTF. They'll call moving SS to Pay-Go "fiscal responsibility".

Now with some tweaks, we really don't need the trust fund, but it will mean the final ripoff of workingclass baby boomers for trillions of dollars. Ezra don't like those hippies anyway.

And what, when Obama puts it to Congress, y'all gonna turn him into a lameduck loser?

Ezra,

You seem blinded, at least in part, by your positive opinion of Orszag. We know he "gets" healthcare and thats good. But if I recall correctly the grand "Orszag-Diamond proposal" is far from a very liberal defense of Social Security. Rather, it posits significant alterations to the program that are unnecessary and potentially regressive.

I think you are confusing your readers by positing the "proposal" as the liberal riposte to the Pete Peterson/Bush plan. Among the Brookings crowd, invertebrate Congress folks, and assorted Washingtonians, it may been effecting. But most Americans and truly "liberal" supporters of social security and the American social compact would disagree.

Contra your breathless attachment to Orszag's social security boosting, Jamie Galbraith - who I think is a wee more befitting of the "liberal" moniker - supports the exact opposite of the "plan."

In DC, often times what is "liberal" - from clintonism an neoliberalism - is far from it. Thus Orszag is squarely in the "liberal" camp spawned by Rubin and Brookings, but I dont count them as allies.

Linda: Medicaid and SSI (which is Medicaid plus a small cash payment) are part of the general fund and are not funded by payroll taxes. SSI is means tested, meaning you have to be poor as well as disabled.

Disability is part of Old Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance (OASDI) which is the correct name for that grab bag of programs we call Social Security. If you have worked 40 quarters and are disabled, you get SS Disability, not SSI. The kick in the teeth is you have to wait 2 years for Medicare, plus the SS check is pretty much guaranteed to be to high for you to qualify for SSI so you lose your Medicaid. Nice system we have here, eh?

I guess it is possible to make the case the since SS runs a multi-billion dollar surplus every year that it indirectly funds Medicaid, but that is not an argument that I would hang my hat on.

The acceptable outcome on entitlements:

1. No cuts in Social Security at all

2. Expand Medicare to Medicare for All. Single payer would save $350 billion a year; through the miracle of compounding, that number gets even better the farther out you go.

Yeah, a lot of campaign contributors and Village insiders will scream. And?

Much better discussion of Social Security over at Angry Bear, Bruce Webb is spot on. Keep your hands off Social Security, it's fine, and doesn't need any frigging "reform".

The Medicare crisis is the SS crisis on steroids. The SS crisis is simple to fix: remove the cap on SS taxable income, and you can actually reduce the SS tax rate. The rich pay more, everyone else pays less and SS is safe for 50 years.

Medicare adds the same problems, plus 15% inflation. Add to that the death of our private payer plan and we really need to turn the system upside down. A single payer plan is the only solution, and allow employers to supply supplemental plans, like dental and chiropractic, as part of their benefits packages.

I seriously doubt anyone will consider privatizing SS after last fall. Can you imagine if Bush had succeeded and millions of senior citizens just saw their SS lose 50% of its value in 3 months along with the value of their homes and the value of their Wall Street portfolio? AARP would be demanding we nationalize the Stock Market if that every happened!

The real problem is the entire health care system and Medicare reform should be done in tandem with that. Some change in social secuirity probably is necessary, but that should be minimal-just increasing the age for full benefits slightly over time and, I think, replacing the payroll tax with a carbon tax in the amount necessary to then fund the system.

Very scary for Democrats if McCain picks a woman. That is the only McCain VP choice that makes a difference. It could actually swing some of the supposedly outraged Clintonista white women to McCain, despite his and his party’s immensely anti-female personality and policies (anti-choice, anti-equal pay, misogynist horndog (called wife c*&t, cheated multiple time on fist wife, etc.) militarism, etc).

Well, we all focus on how Mr. president make our medical system better.
By the way, if you are interested in high qualities but low price replica watches Please contact us.

Laptop Batteries
Laptop Batteries discount laptop battery

The real problem is the entire health care system and Medicare reform should be done in tandem with that. Some change in social secuirity probably is necessary, but that should be minimal-just increasing the age for full benefits slightly over time and, I think, replacing the payroll tax with a carbon tax in the amount necessary to then fund the system.

nice post!

It was a very nice idea! Just wanna say thank you for the information you have shared. Just continue writing this kind of post. I will be your loyal reader. Thanks again.

I think I will try to recommend this post to my friends and family, cuz it’s really helpful.

most Americans aren't actually privy to how haphazard the military commissions are--they're essentially a new legal system invented from scratch to try detainees against whom we have dubious evidence or only intelligence information. The adjective "military" may give them a certain sense of authority for those who are unaware just how poorly the process has worked so far compared to federal courts, but this is misleading since the DoJ's civilian lawyers are actually more experienced in trying terrorism cases. http://www.watchgy.com/

Are you want to own the cheapest Apple and Iphone?
Iphone Accessor

I love air jordan shoes.

love
[url=http://blog.sina.com.cn/hoh]love[/url]
love">http://blog.sina.com.cn/hoh>love

Thank you for the sensible critique. Me & my neighbour were preparing to do some research about that. We got a good book on that matter from our local library and most books where not as influensive as your information. I am very glad to see such information which I was searching for a long time.This made very glad Smile

most Americans aren't actually privy to how haphazard the military commissions are

Thank you for the sensible critiqueugg outlet

ugg boots sale-Warm ugg boots for all the family remain at the heart of our collection,find your favorite UGGs from stunning designs-ugg boots uk

Famous top quality Uggs with great discount are On Sale.
We are the best Ugg Sale online store.

If you don't know about jewelry knowledge, but want to action you can see jewelry fashion review,then maybe you can save your money!

Famous top quality Uggs with great discount are On Sale.
We are the best Ugg Sale online store.

The UGGs online shop website.UGGS for cheap

The christian louboutin online shop website,
ChristianLouboutinFashion.com

Get Hermes bags in luxurybagsshop

http://www.hervelegerclothing.com/" >Herve Leger women's fashions at hervelegerclothing.All products are best quality hervelegerclothing sale on the market.herve leger bandage dress,herve leger wiki,vintage gerve leger, max azria.

I agree with you!Put on cotton boots is also moving up and
quiet,such as the ugg boots uk

Just one question: how to add your blog into my rrs reader, thanks so much.

I agree with you!
Before alpha I would just like to accomplish a few comments about my position on affairs Louis Vuitton bags.

I agree with you!
Before alpha I would just like to accomplish a few comments about my position on affairs
Louis Vuitton bags


I will add this website to my stumble upons!

Thank you for your sharing,It’s wonderful !

All Genuine UGG Boots in our Classic Collection feature a soft foam insole covered with genuine sheepskin and have a molded EVA light and flexible outsole designed for refreshing comfort with every step.Thank you for your understanding and support!

The ghd straighteners technology also can make the hair iron heat quickly and maintain the temperature.

Thank you for your understanding and support!

Thank you for your understanding and support!

Welcome to herve leger online store .The Fashionable dress world!The bandage herve leger dress continues to the classic impression of the brand.
The new style and designer of the brand standing out your matchless stature.Wearing it,you will be more sexy and graceful.If so offended, please forgive me^^!

Thank you for your article!

thank you very much

Never frown, when you are sad, because you never know who is falling in love with your smile.

Am glad to see this article, thank you.

Now winter nights enlarge
The number of their hours,
And clouds their storms discharge
Upon the airy towers.
Let now the chimneys blaze,
And cups o’erflow with wine;
http://www.uggbootshome.net
Let well-tuned words amaze
With harmony divine.
Now yellow waxen lights
Shall wait on honey love,
While youthful revels, masques, and courtly sights
Sleep’s leaden spells remove.

---------------《Winter Nights》

Thanks For posting,Very Nice Keep up date a more article.

thanks

The greatest advantage of Christian Louboutin Sale is that the price is reasonable, and compared to similar products of different brands, consumers will soon realize that this is a such a big concession, Christian Louboutin Shoes definitely can be considered a cost-effective products.

This is my first time comment at your blog. http://www.thewowgold.net and very happy to comment here.

Good post! Thanks for your information!

">http://www.bestreplicarolexwatches.com">rolex replica,authentic quality. Many people are attractive by them.

The best Herve Leger Dresses store specialize in sale different kinds of discount Herve Leger Dress,our all Herve Leger Bandage Dress are 80% OFF,Free shipping

cool and nice blog.

If you are looking for the perfect links of london Sweetie for a loved with exceptional taste and an eye for quality,

links of london offered at here is your best choice. Besides, you won’t believe how much you saved with an affordable price.

">http://www.bestreplicarolexwatches.com">rolex replica,authentic quality. Many people are attractive by them.

I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don't know what to

say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.

Post a comment



Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Search for:

About Ezra Klein

Ezra Klein is an associate editor at The American Prospect. An archive of his articles for The American Prospect can be found here.

Email | RSS | Twitter

Link Blog:


Renew your print subscription or e-subscription.
Get an e-subscription for $14.95.
Give the gift of political insight. Send The American Prospect to a friend.
Change your email address or street address.
YES! I want to receive The American Prospect
— the essential source for progressive ideas.
Explore The American Prospect's award-winning investigative journalism and provocative essays in a free trial issue. Continue receiving The American Prospect at only $19.95 for a one-year subscription - a savings of 60% off the newsstand price!
First Name
Last Name
Address 1
Address 2
City
State
ZIP     
Email

Should you decide not to continue receiving the magazine after the initial free issue, simply write "cancel" on the invoice and you will not be billed.

© 2010 by The American Prospect, Inc.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Permissions and Reprints