THE COLOMBIAN CONTEXT.
Chris Hayes writes:
Imagine a country where CEO's live in fear. In just the past five years, 400 CEO's -- from manufacturing, banking, real estate -- have been shot down in cold blood. (Thousands over the past 15 years.) Almost none of these murders have been solved. Indeed, over the past five years the percentage of CEO murders simply brought to trial has declined from 30% to zero. CEO's now more or less live in fear.They're murdering trade unionists. EPI even has a helpful graph, complete with a cross-reference of how much energy the Colombian government is putting into the protection of union organizers and the prosecution of their hunters:Can you imagine the US have friendly relations with such a place? Can you imagine a president expending political capital to treat that country favorably in an international agreement? Right. Of course not.
Of course, such a place does exist, but they're not murdering CEO's.
Sobering stuff. And something the United States should demand an end to long before we consider a Free Trade Agreement with Colombia. Whatever you believe about the enforcability of labor standards enshrined in transnational trade legislation, they're obviously a joke if actual Colombians can't even survive efforts to create unions.
Feeds: 


COMMENTS (11)
How is Colombia any different from the Oman and Peru deals--which both Clinton and Obama supported, i believe?
Posted by: amberglow | April 7, 2008 11:53 AM
and how does the Andean Trade Preference Act play into any Colombia deal? And did anyone care about dead CEOs--or fair trade-- when it kept getting extended and extended?
-- http://www.latinamericapress.org/article.asp?lanCode=1&artCode=5548 -- Ten more months of tariff preferences (3/08)
Posted by: amberglow | April 7, 2008 12:05 PM
How does this compare to the overall rates of murders and prosecutions? Not that it would speak better of Colombia if they weren't prosecuting murders more generally, but it would speak badly in a different way.
Posted by: AlanSP | April 7, 2008 12:22 PM
Too bad they fired Mark Penn. I would've loved to hear him defending a record like that.
Posted by: bcamarda | April 7, 2008 12:54 PM
How I wish we could end the war on drugs and get our people out of Columbia. Free trade is good. We gave aid to the Colmibian Goverment to fight the civil war. Insane! Both sides are bad.
Posted by: Floccina | April 7, 2008 4:10 PM
Of *course* we should go for free trade with Colombia because it's good for the US, something no one here seems to consider.
They already have access to our markets, but when trying to sell goods there, our producers meet stiff tarrifs. It will be to our advantage, both economically and strategically, to do this.
Posted by: El Viajero | April 7, 2008 5:41 PM
Alan,
I find it pretty hard to believe that the rate of murders tried in general in Columbia is 0%
Posted by: Eric k | April 7, 2008 6:01 PM
We could also use a bit more public support from U.S. politicians for Colombia's fragile independent judiciary, who have made history in attempting to penetrate the dense links between the right wing narco-paramilitary death squads and the government itself.
Uribe has overall supported their efforts, but then tends to lash out whenever their investigations lead to close to him via his closest allies.
Posted by: El Cid | April 7, 2008 6:01 PM
Oh, also, let's not ignore that for the first time a national march was called for this past 06 March to commemorate the victims of the gov't-linked forces & narcoparamilitaries.
(This followed the much larger & state-encouraged march a week prior emphasizing the victims of the left wing guerrillas.)
In response to the call, Uribe's assessor called them allies of the guerrillas. This had the intended effect and 4 of the organizers -- trade unionists -- were assassinated within a week of the march.
From IPS:
Posted by: El Cid | April 7, 2008 6:11 PM
There is something big missing from this debate. The Martin Crutsinger AP article I read this morning said that most Columbian products enter the US duty-free and the trade deal is to lower Columbian duties on US goods. Uh... can't Columbia do that any time it wants? Obviously we are giving Columbia something that is not being spelled out in what I am reading. What is it they get from us?
Posted by: Th | April 8, 2008 9:41 AM
"Patriotism" is similar to "Family" in that you give both your family and your country special consideration over others.
The commenters, instead, seem to be more interested in benefitting the foreign workers at the expense of the US.
Posted by: El Viajero | April 8, 2008 12:51 PM