UNIVERSAL PRE-K.
Responding to the poor performance of Reading First, and my comment that most educational interventions turn out to be flops, Kevin Drum sighs, "It must be a discouraging field to work in." The big bright spot, it should be said, is universal pre-k, which has not only shown itself to have massive educational benefits, but to be tremendously cost-effective as well. As the conservative economist James Heckman wrote in The Wall Street Journal, “There are many reasons why investing in disadvantaged young children has a high economic return. Early interventions for disadvantaged children promote schooling, raise the quality of the work force, enhance the productivity of schools, and reduce crime, teenage pregnancy and welfare dependency. They raise earnings and promote social attachment. Focusing solely on earnings gains, returns to dollars invested are as high as 15% to 17%.”
It's one of the great disappointments of contemporary liberal politics that so many folks who call themselves liberals spend their time arguing about teacher's unions, testing, and merit pay, rather than uniting behind universal pre-k. Educational issues, for reasons I've never really figured out, have become the spot where older liberals mount a superficial display of their independence from party orthodoxy, rather than actually try and figure out, and fight for, the interventions that appear to work. Universal Pre-K works. The only problem is, you don't get to brag about your couraegous break frm the teacher's unions when you advocate for it.
Feeds: 


COMMENTS (27)
great idea, but it falls in the same bucket of "prevention" that nobody wants to get behind. It's true for healthcare and it's true for infrastructure--we'd rather cross our fingers hoping nothing bad will happen and then inevitably have to pay more to fix more severe problems after something breaks than to spend less upfront to prevent something from breaking. Pre-K is a form of society insurance and pretty low hanging fruit at that. Why don't we do it?
Posted by: JMS | May 2, 2008 9:53 AM
"It's one of the great disappointments of contemporary liberal politics that so many folks who call themselves liberals spend their time arguing about teacher's unions, testing, and merit pay, rather than uniting behind universal pre-k."
Perhaps because they understand that if a candidate were to run on a platform of universal pre-K, careerist scum "professional Democrats" like Ezra Klein will support their opponent if they feel like it's in their personal interests.
Posted by: Petey | May 2, 2008 10:00 AM
I am not sure your take is quite right. Pre-K has been an integral part of the remedy fashioned in many of the school finance litigations, esp. in NJ. Clearly, policy makers, including libs, recognize its benefits. The problem is UNIVERSAL pre-K. It is extraordinarily expensive. NJ is trying to move toward it, but the state and local governments are groaning under enormous debt and excessive property taxes, respectively.
Posted by: mert7878 | May 2, 2008 10:05 AM
Right, which is why it should be federal, with dedicated -- or at least secure -- funding streams. property taxes are a really bad way to do school funding.
Posted by: Ezra | May 2, 2008 11:18 AM
Ezra - have you ever read John Gatto's "Dumbing us Down"? I remain to be convinced of institutional school's benefits - and now we want to make even younger children attend school. We should be delaying entry into school until at least age 6.
Posted by: Karen | May 2, 2008 8:14 PM
I think this is one of those cases where the data may be solid, but people either don't know it or don't believe it. Admittedly, when I look back at my preschool days, I have hard time believing it had a profound influence on my ability to learn.
If supporters of universal pre-k found a way to articulate their theories in way that seems intuitively obvious, I bet there would be much broader support for it.
Posted by: andrew | May 3, 2008 10:03 PM
Other sudies show no long term benefits and the researchers bias generally runs toward finding a benefit.
Posted by: Floccina | May 5, 2008 11:46 AM
Universal Pre-K works wonders for disadvantaged children and families. Programs such as those in CT or NJ require family oriented wrap around services addressing the whole family's needs. The only drawback, as with the NJ Abbott Program is it requires P-3 certifications and salary levels for lead teachers on a par with the public school system. This is what raises the cost of pre-k programs to the point where providers cannot possibly maintain either the salaries or the animosity of those teachers earning much less. Some realism is needed here.
Posted by: Venetia | May 7, 2008 2:22 PM
Ezra, you're confused. There's a difference between "universal" prekindergarten and "targeted prekindergarten." Universal is publicly funded and offered to all 4-year-olds or 3-year-olds or both. Targeted means offering the program to disadvantaged children to help them catch up. James Heckman, who you cite, actually thinks that, given limited resources, it makes most sense to target them at the most disadvantaged children. So, he does not favor universal programs. Other liberals, such as Bruce Fuller of the University of California, Berkeley, also favor targeted programs because he says universal programs replace private money middle class families are spending already with public money.
Posted by: Richard | May 7, 2008 5:06 PM
Ezra got it right, but it hard to cut through the misinformation and nonsense coming from the old/far right and the old/far left. Neither wants government to help the middle class. Oklahoma is the only state that has preschool education for all and the program helps all kids, but helps the disadvantaged more, so it increases equality without leaving the middle class behind. There are numerous reasons to believe that universal preschool education will benefit disadvantaged children more than targeted programs. New Jersey's program is 2/3 private provided--it shows what can be done when high standards are adequately funded. Much of the middle class does not have access to high quality preschool education; all many can afford is poor quality child care. The funding required for good universal preschool education is small potatoes compared to corporate welfare, subsidies to millionaire farmers, and other unnecessary government programs not to mention IRAQ.
Posted by: Steve Barnett | May 8, 2008 10:18 AM
I am a big fan of universal pre-K, but then again I tend to work in that age range. My fear is that by offering universal pre-k that the standards for pre-k will go down and the educational situation will turn into a babysitting situation. I think if universal pre-K is going to be done right it needs to be backed with a tremendous amount of resources pumped into teachers focusing on the usual practice in the field but additionally on instilling educational and psychological theory.
It seems so simple to me, that if you start early, you close the gap early, but maybe I am a bit to naive and hopeful.
Posted by: Education Maze | May 8, 2008 6:17 PM
高压锅炉管
Posted by: 不锈钢管 | October 27, 2008 5:47 AM
And this is how they sneak stuff by us. Pay attention because things like this will be happening more often as we move into 2009. The University of California, which does not currently adhere to any kind of affirmative action policies, is trying to add them in under disguise. They want to make changes to their admissions policy, claiming it is merely to remove "technical barriers."
------------------
anderson
http://www.drug-intervention.com/virginia-drug-intervention.html
Posted by: anderson | January 17, 2009 5:33 AM
Hi,
I am newly join in this site. Here is where you can find information and resources concerning drug and alcohol abuse. If you need to find out how to help a loved one who is an addict, the information is here on this site. Or, if you need to know how to understand substance abuse, you will be able to learn more here. You can also find out how and why people become substance abusers.
=========================================
sharoo
Drug Intervention
Posted by: sharoosunidhi | March 6, 2009 6:45 AM
I am newly joined in this site. It’s a nice blog. I am totally agreed. Here is where you can find information and resources concerning drug and alcohol abuse. If you need to find out how to help a loved one who is an addict, the information is here on this site. Or if you need to know how to understand substance abuse, you will be able to learn more here. You can also find out how and why people become substance abusers. Keep it updated. Thanks a lot.
Jeremy
Drug Intervention
Posted by: jeremy | March 9, 2009 12:56 AM
It is difficult for somebody dealing with an alcohol addiction to realize that he or she has a dependency problem. They can hardly understand their life using the alcohol; forget seeing his or her life without any alcohol. But an alcohol problem can turn into something way worse that can damage not only the individual suffering from the dependency but also people around him or her. A drug intervention should be made before the alcoholic got to that place.
______
jackspar.
Drug Intervention Florida
Posted by: jackspar | March 14, 2009 9:51 AM
That's Good! I am a big fan of universal pre-K, but then again I tend to work in that age range. My fear is that by offering universal pre-k that the standards for pre-k will go down and the educational situation will turn into a babysitting situation. I think if universal pre-K is going to be done right it needs to be backed with a tremendous amount of resources pumped into teachers focusing on the usual practice in the field but additionally on instilling educational and psychological theory.
Sydney
Drug Intervention Georgia
Posted by: Sydney | March 15, 2009 11:53 PM
Interventions used in trials to alter patient-practitioner interaction are varied and difficult to classify. We developed a taxonomy based on our theoretical understanding of the ways in which collaboration between patient and practitioner can be enhanced and may lead to improved outcomes. This framework has been described as the new clinical method. It involves the patient and practitioner reaching a mutual understanding of each others’ explanatory models of illness and disease. It therefore takes into account the patient’s ideas, concerns, and expectations at all stages of the clinical interview, from gathering information through problem formulation to decisions about management. It is hypothesized that this method will lead to more precise framing of the problem and management that makes sense to the patient, which could enhance outcomes through several mechanisms. Specifically, a correct diagnosis will be matched to a more effective prescription. Involvement of the patient will lead to engagement in taking any agreed treatment. It will also mobilize a range of self-care activities tending to increase well-being and function through social, psychological, and perhaps even immunological mechanisms.Finally, the collaborative approach might reduce the mismatch between a patient’s and the practitioner’s representations of the problem and thereby increase efficiency through a reduction in unnecessary investigations, consultations, and unused medication
-------------
mukesh11
Drug Intervention Minnesota - Drug Intervention Minnesota
Posted by: mukesh | April 13, 2009 8:03 PM
Hi,
The people are losing their moral while becoming modern alcoholism addiction. The society needs to be attentive that their life value. Well things needs to be modernized but keeping intact with moral values.
Drug Intervention Minnesota
Posted by: Lewisray | April 13, 2009 11:42 PM
I appreciate the concern which is been rose. The things need to be sorted out because it is about the individual but it can be with everyone.
Barbara Brown
Drug Intervention North Dakota
Posted by: Barbara | April 16, 2009 4:48 AM
Often, even when an alcohol intervention is done, the person does not want get help in a treatment center. Many times, some time will pass before the alcohol dependent individual can see the extent of the damage alcohol causes. But even so, don’t think that an intervention has not been useful, you need to give them time and space. Each individual struggling with an alcohol addiction will take their own time to see that they need an alcohol treatment. When the addict calls friends looking for an alcohol treatment, the addict’s friends will know that the intervention worked.
Barbara
Drug Intervention North Dakota
Posted by: Anonymous | April 16, 2009 4:53 AM
thaaaaanks
شات بنت السعوديه
Posted by: بنت السعوديه | June 13, 2009 1:27 AM
http://www.gamegoldme.com
Posted by: wow power leveling | August 4, 2009 9:20 PM
I really believe that these social networks will have a huge impact on what we can accomplish as groups, it'll help us be very organized and communicate.
Posted by: links london jewelry | November 10, 2009 12:06 AM
I don't know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.ugg outlet
Posted by: cheap uggs online | December 15, 2009 10:51 PM
The hot-sale Ugg Boots are coming now.We offer wide range of colors and styles ugg boots uk and Ugg Boots Sale for you.Shopping now for your favorite!
Posted by: ugg boots sale | December 19, 2009 3:17 AM
thank you very much links of london
Posted by: links of london | January 11, 2010 11:43 PM