SCHUMER DEFENDS THE PUBLIC PLAN.
Chuck Schumer just forced the Senate Finance Committee's Health Care Coverage Roundtable to address the public plan. And give Schumer some credit. He didn't hedge. "Just as bad as a public plan with an unfair advantage," he said, "is no public plan at all. My colleague from Kansas said the American people don't want the government involved. Well, let me tell you, the American people have some problems with the government. But they have a lot more problems with private insurers."
Schumer went on to argue that opposition to the public plan is predicated on a high-functioning insurance market that doesn't now, and hasn't ever, existed. Private insurers, Schumer exclaimed, can't even tell you what a given treatment costs. They won't release their data on either quality or prices. This is not an elegant market that should be protected from further competitive pressures. This is a mess in desperate need of new players with new incentives. "To not have a public plan and let it compete the way [Senator Baucus] outlines in his white paper is, in my view, closeminded," said Schumer. Then he paused, and smiled, looking out over a crowd think with industry representatives. "In my view," he continued, "it may even be a little self interested."
Oh, and one more thing. Never the sort of guy to use a scalpel when a sledgehammer will do, Schumer, God love him, is calling his public insurance option "Plan USA."
Related: Chuck Schumer's public plan compromise.
Feeds: 


COMMENTS (7)
Good to see him defending the concept of a public plan. In the end though, the details are what matter.
I'd actually rather have no public plan than a public plan doomed to fail because of booby-traps inserted by the insurance industry.
Posted by: myrtle parker | May 5, 2009 1:07 PM
"USA! . . . USA! . . . USA!"
(I think, the law should specifically state that whenever Plan USA is mentioned by name, the "USA" chant should automatically commence. Cheering fists implied.)
Posted by: Peter A. Basso | May 5, 2009 1:22 PM
Absolutely awesome!! Go Chuck go.
Plan USA is a nice touch, btw.
Posted by: scott | May 5, 2009 1:45 PM
Not having followed the politics of this, does anyone have Schumer's back, or is he on his own on this?
Posted by: John I | May 5, 2009 2:08 PM
Every elected Repub who speaks against "socialized" medicine ought to be forced to give up their "free" healthcare.
Posted by: merl | May 5, 2009 2:59 PM
"Oh, and one more thing. Never the sort of guy to use a scalpel when a sledgehammer will do, Schumer, God love him, is calling his public insurance option "Plan USA."
This is why Schumer is so fucking good at what he does.
When he decides to get into a fight on the side of the angels, the angels win that fight.
-----
If Schumer, Baucus, and Obama are willing to go to the mattresses over a decent public plan, I simply can't see a way it doesn't get enacted into law.
Posted by: Petey | May 5, 2009 3:22 PM
It's not a public plan, it's a consumer-driven plan! The only people it serves are the consumers! Not profits!
I think that's an awesome piece of jujitsu, too.
Posted by: anon | May 5, 2009 5:14 PM