RSS Feeds Feeds: Articles | Issues
Articles About TAP Subscribe Donate
TAPPED  |  Beat the Press

Remember Me
Forgot your password?

The symbol identifies content for paid subscribers only.


 


Momma said wonk you out

THE PROBLEM WITH CORPORATE TAX CODES.

The administration's proposals to close some corporate tax loopholes didn't get much attention last week. In part, that's because the actual issues being addressed are extremely complicated. But that doesn't mean they're not important. This sort of thing, for instance, is really galling, and insofar as we need to raise $60 billion from somewhere, stopping corporations from playing a game of international tax arbitrage is probably a good idea.

But "this sort of thing" is endemic to a complicated tax code. The more intricate the statutes, the easier it will be for trained lawyers to find loopholes. But if the loopholes are very complicated, then the only people who know enough to argue over them will be the lobbyists dedicated to their preservation. It's hard to build a movement around the fact that a rule designed to simplify the classification of different kinds of subsidiaries has been misused by multinational companies who set up subsidiaries and then use high-interest loans to shield profits from taxation. I mean, you probably didn't even make it all the way through that sentence. A simpler tax coe isn't only important because it's more efficient. It's also important because it's more governable.



COMMENTS

I propose a rule - if Congress wants to financially incentivize something, they need to do it as a subsidy ... and not as a tax credit.

Maybe it's just me, or does "simplify the tax code" mean, for the left, to get rich guys and corporations to pay more taxes, and for the right for those very same guys to pay less taxes?

Either way, our tax code is complicated, in part, because we have a complex economy, so we should strive to make it "better," regardless of whether or not it's so simple that accountant's will go existence.

Actually, they mostly shield income from taxation by foreign countries. Which makes the issue substantially more complicated than you imply.

Within a few years, we will be the only major economy to tax the worldwide income of our multinatonal corporations. It could quite plausibly be argued that the check-the-box rules are a back-door way to let our multinational corporations compete on a more even playing field with foreign multinationals that pay lower corporate income tax (unless they are Japanese) and don't pay domestic tax on worldwide income.

Thanks alot...

great and helpfully blog...

___________________
Jessica
Get 28 movie channals for 3 months free

i thinks it is very nice site for every one.this site is work very well and i hope you will be good work always.

There is indeed a tax break for US-based multinational corporations to locate operations overseas. Bush isn't to blame for it -- it's been there for decades. It's also true that Bush doesn't support Kerry's proposed remedy, which is controversial. kol germe ameliyatı

gateway pa-1650-01 ac adapter
gateway pa-1650-01
pa-1650-01

great and helpfully!

this site is work very well and i hope you will be good work always. Thank you!

estetik
ve estetik burun ameliyatları teşekkür eder..

Thank you for your sharing. Supposed to attack these head-on and you will find a deep sense of gratification that will fuel your happiness. Maybe you are also interested in Abercrombie and Fitch. I'm just hearing the curiosity behind it.

Nice for your sharing! Welcome @ : Nike Dunk SB

Nice for your sharing! Welcome @ : Nike Dunk SB

British people enjoy nike dunk sports shoes. Enter it. You will get a new sightseeing. Young people love sneakers. You will surely love nike dunk.

Did not know about the previous knowledge of
weight loss

welcome to goodnikespace
nike shox.

Post a comment



Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Search for:

About Ezra Klein

Ezra Klein is an associate editor at The American Prospect. An archive of his articles for The American Prospect can be found here.

Email | RSS | Twitter

Link Blog:


Renew your print subscription or e-subscription.
Get an e-subscription for $14.95.
Give the gift of political insight. Send The American Prospect to a friend.
Change your email address or street address.
YES! I want to receive The American Prospect
— the essential source for progressive ideas.
Explore The American Prospect's award-winning investigative journalism and provocative essays in a free trial issue. Continue receiving The American Prospect at only $19.95 for a one-year subscription - a savings of 60% off the newsstand price!
First Name
Last Name
Address 1
Address 2
City
State
ZIP     
Email

Should you decide not to continue receiving the magazine after the initial free issue, simply write "cancel" on the invoice and you will not be billed.

© 2009 by The American Prospect, Inc.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Permissions and Reprints