BIDEN AS VP.
All media outlets are reporting it's Biden, which suggests the Obama campaign is ready to take the foreign policy fight to McCain. There'll be more to say soon enough, recapping Biden's effort to disrupt the war in Iraq through the Biden-Lugar resolution (though when that failed, Biden voted for the war), noting that his son is going to Iraq in October, mentioning that he authored the Violence Against Women Act, and playing up the fact that he chairs the Foreign Relations Committee. But if you really want to know why a Biden choice makes sense, watch this video, particularly the facial expression at its end:
For longer thoughts on the subject of Biden, read this piece.
Feeds: 


COMMENTS (30)
This is hilarious. A bunch of people commenting on a blog are judging Biden who has not even been given the job yet.
All these great liberals here. Why don't you idiot progressives win a race, then you would have the opportunity to choose a VP.
You see, Progressives couldn't win a game of bingo. All they know how to do is whine.
Biden was an excellent choice. I trust Obama because he knows how to win.
Progressives on a web site have no idea how to win. They just know how to whine.
So judging by the losers on your threads Ezra. Obama made the right choice.
But why would Obama know. He is only doing something. You crying babies are posting on a web site.
Obama earned the right to pick Biden. If we listened to all the idiots here, John Edwards be the nominee.
So here's an idea whiners. Shut your fucking mouth until you see Biden in action.
Why don't you pussies run yourself if you are so smart. That would take effort. And it is so much easier to sit home and jackoff to your pictures of Nader and think you really mean something.
Well, you do mean something. You mean shit.
Posted by: Ken | August 23, 2008 1:58 AM
At a minimum, Biden will be entertaining (in a good way).
Posted by: Quiddity | August 23, 2008 2:02 AM
that video was so entertaining, i watched it six times!
oh happy day!!!
Posted by: jacqueline | August 23, 2008 2:16 AM
Joe Biden, D-MBNA/BoA/Countrywide???
Freakin advocate for the middle class my hiney.
Sad.
Posted by: Wandering About | August 23, 2008 3:21 AM
i hope several members of the collective known as jacqueline go bankrupt because of credit card debt caused by medical bills
Ken - Is it true that Obama's balls taste like a Chicago dog but with a hint of cardamon?
Posted by: tools | August 23, 2008 4:34 AM
I LOVE that bit. I never fails to entertain. The bankruptcy bill is going to be tough stuff to handle although when it occurred few Americans gave a sh*&.
Yeah, John Edwards was the only progressive choice at some point. Yikes!
Posted by: Kate | August 23, 2008 5:32 AM
What a safe, sad choice. Entirely expected, if one has read Obama's books.
But damn. I will always mourn in a year like this what could have been.
- PS: I have a kitten that could pwn McMegan on her criticism of your post; someone needs to put her out of her misery in regards to how actual economies work.
Posted by: Peter | August 23, 2008 5:48 AM
Sad and stupid pick.
It should have been Hillary, but apparently Obamas problems with powerful women run very deep...still has Mommy issues apparently.
Obama basically panicked when Russia went into Georgia, he looked like a deer in the headlights with his first public statement.
This is a clear admission that Obama is not a genuine change agent, Biden has been playing the same old Washington game since Obama was 10 years old.
Biden is even worse then Obama when it comes to talking down to women.
If McCain is politically smart, which he hasn't shown much yet, he will go with a women.
Posted by: Pat | August 23, 2008 6:08 AM
"recapping Biden's effort to disrupt the war in Iraq through the Biden-Lugar resolution"
Is Ezra stupid or a liar?
Posted by: Petey | August 23, 2008 6:33 AM
Biden is a slap in the face to Hillarys' female supporters. Biden is the anti-Hillary.
He's that swarmy, creepy in you face guy at the bar with the hair plugs and loud mouth.
You try to be nice but just wish he would go away and leave you alone.
Posted by: Anonymous | August 23, 2008 7:09 AM
I love that Biden can do that while finishing his breakfast.
Posted by: DonBoy | August 23, 2008 7:39 AM
Good times. Biden has the creds for strong foreign policy debate. The best choice by far.
Posted by: asl | August 23, 2008 7:40 AM
Biden is a creature of Washington DC. He had 3 years work as a lawyer and then went to Washington at the age of 29 and has been there ever since.
How is he going to change Washington Barack? He is Washington.
Thanks for the 3 AM message too buddy, way to make sure I was first to know. What a friggin' con.
Posted by: Amstel | August 23, 2008 7:47 AM
The election will be about the economy, not foreign policy. How much help will Biden give Obama with Jobs Jobs Jobs? Here in the Midwest, Biden is an unknown.
Obama has been off message since he decided to go to Europe. The huge number of votes for Clinton should have been a clue that the Obama economic message was not reaching the voters.
Posted by: bakho | August 23, 2008 7:57 AM
"If McCain is politically smart, which he hasn't shown much yet, he will go with a women."
Indeed. If he goes with Palin, he wins the election.
-----
First Democratic ticket in over 40 years without a liberal on it.
The all General Electric ticket must please Ezra to no end.
Posted by: Petey | August 23, 2008 8:11 AM
LoL, the McTrolls are out in full force tonight! Keep racking up those McPoints, haters. Fucking pathetic.
Posted by: Soullite | August 23, 2008 8:12 AM
"LoL, the McTrolls are out in full force tonight! Keep racking up those McPoints, haters. Fucking pathetic."
Obama is the troll, Soullite.
Posted by: Petey | August 23, 2008 8:13 AM
Good choice. Serious choice. It allows for the continuation of the portrayal of McCain as an out of touch plutocrat. Choosing megabucks on their way to billionaire status Clintons would end that line of attack . McCain has very few women from which to choose. Palin will seem like a transparent play for women's vote. She just lacks the credentials. The senator from Texas is too old to be matched with McCain. I doubt Fiorina brings with her the respect of the business world.
Posted by: proud anon. | August 23, 2008 8:35 AM
Indeed. If he goes with Palin, he wins the election.
God, you're retarded.
Have you ever seen her? She comes off like a backbencher from the PTA.
Posted by: mark f | August 23, 2008 9:24 AM
Can the petey and others just be honest and admit there is nothing obama could have done here other than say he's no longer going to seek the nomination ? It's tiresome to read the same posts by Anon, Petey, etc every post which are essentially pretending that it was about something Obama did versus being about Obama, period. More than tiresome, it's just you rolling around in your own manure. Biden isn't my first, second or third pick, but he's a good to descent choice. I don't like some of his votes, but I am not going to use that as an excuse to make him into the worse choice ever. I challenge you to provide a balanced view of Biden, or Obama? Can you do that Anon or petey? Some how I think not. In your construction Obama is far worse than Mccain. This is something like how the discussion goes with PUMA types-- Mccain is anti abortion. Obama is pro choice but ambivalent about abortion. "Well Obama is the worse candidate we have on abortion ever." It's almost like you are constitutional incapable of placing his views in context compared to McCain. Criticism is fine. But what you ae doing isn't criticism. It's masturbation.
Posted by: akaison | August 23, 2008 10:22 AM
I'll have to admit, the Biden pick puzzles me. I can only guess that Obama felt particularly vulnerable when it came to foreign policy. Or maybe he felt he needed a VP who would be all too ready to be the "attack dog". After all, Biden's "a noun, a verb, and 9/11" comment is perhaps the defining sentence for Rudy Giuliani today.
Still, I'm rather disappointed that Sebelius wasn't picked. That would have been my dream ticket.
Posted by: 32_Footsteps | August 23, 2008 10:40 AM
The interesting question to me is whether Bayh, Chet Edwards, and some of the other awful names that were floated were ever true contenders, or whether the Obama campaign just put their names out there to mollify progressive opposition to the eventual pick, who would look good in comparison.
Posted by: jeebus | August 23, 2008 11:02 AM
Obama is the troll, Soullite.
You're off your case, Petey!
Posted by: McGonigle | August 23, 2008 11:38 AM
With lots of candidates, I watch them muck up their campaign and think, "doesn't he see this is all wrong? What the hell is his problem?" and look as they go down in defeat. With Obama, even if I do sometimes think the same thing, afterwards I realize, "Wow. He really knew what he was doing."
Posted by: Tyro | August 23, 2008 11:57 AM
If he goes with Palin, he wins the election.
Ah, yes: If he does, he must be hoping that news from Alaska travels south on a moose. Palin's star ain't so shiny any more.
More find-the-lady from Petey the grifter, brought to you in association with InTrade and the craps game in the back-alley.
Posted by: pseudonymous in nc | August 23, 2008 12:40 PM
Though that theory begs a question: why put all that energy into mollifying progressives (who are probably the least likely to bolt), and so little into mollifying HRC supporters? I'm not a Hillary fan, but the *lack* of effort put into pretending that she was evah a contenda strikes me as easily read as either arrogant or vindictive.
Posted by: Wandering About | August 23, 2008 12:41 PM
I'm not a Hillary fan, but the *lack* of effort put into pretending that she was evah a contenda strikes me as easily read as either arrogant or vindictive.
I was thinking about this, and it seems to me that, assuming Obama was never going to pick Hillary, it was smarter to telegraph that fact all along.
The other option, stringing her and her supporters along only to disappoint them in the end, strikes me as being much more likely to produce a backlash.
If Hill was never a possibility, I think he handled it about right: keep her in the discussion to some degree, out of respect, but make it relatively clear that it wasn't going to be her.
Posted by: jeebus | August 23, 2008 12:55 PM
There are lots of elements of the trolling here that are high-larious, but my favorite is the one saying that Biden has a bad record on women's rights, despite the fact that by every objective measure, he has the best record in the Senate. You know you're really grasping for straws when you stoop to that shit.
Posted by: Brock | August 23, 2008 1:16 PM
Obama is the troll, Soullite.
It's Petey. I remember not too long ago when he was pushing John Edwards (who I liked). How would that one have worked out, Petey?
Then it was Hillary, and still is I think. I sure hope Petey is going for McCain now. Kiss of death and all that.
Posted by: Pug | August 23, 2008 9:49 PM
What is the deal with akaison's fixation on masturbation? Does the guy have issues or just a limited set of tropes?
www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTneO6UgRuM
Posted by: Divinyls | August 25, 2008 5:39 AM