RSS Feeds Feeds: Articles | Issues
Articles About TAP Subscribe Donate
TAPPED  |  Beat the Press

Remember Me
Forgot your password?

The symbol identifies content for paid subscribers only.


 


Momma said wonk you out

THE ENDURING APOLOGY.

Why do John Harris and Jim Vandehei keep doing this?

Media madness. Reporters complain about the lack of spontaneity in politics. Then we punish spontaneity by ensuring that any impolitic comment gets played and replayed, often simplified and distorted in each replaying—usually accompanied with disapproving analysis about a candidate’s lack of discipline and inability to stay on message.

The lack of press access to both candidates this fall is frustrating. But the truth is McCain would be foolish to indulge in the kind of free-flowing, free-associating conversations that won such notice in 2000. Obama’s natural instincts are to tightly control his image and words, which works nicely in this media environment.

An unscripted campaign would be more interesting and more useful to voters, but it would require two unlikely ingredients: Candidates self-confident enough to throw out the script, and a news media that would devote as much attention to ideas as to gaffes.

Every couple of months, they come out with a new op-ed that lambastes the media's role in cheapening our democracy and creating a substanceless, horserace-obsessed politics. Then, in the interim, they run a major political publication whose latest innovation is crowning a daily winner of the day's news cycle. Either they should become that "news media that would devote as much attention to ideas as to gaffes" or they should admit that it's impossible and quit their jobs in a very public protest. But to keep writing op-eds pointing out the harm their industry, and their publication, does to American politics is extremely weird. I'm glad they're publicly making the case -- they have, to be sure, a unique credibility -- but I'd be even more glad to see them start trying to change the game.



COMMENTS

Either they should become that "news media that would devote as much attention to ideas as to gaffes" or they should admit that it's impossible and quit their jobs in a very public protest. There's a third possibility: they could turn Politico into a serious news organization.

Very little, with the possible exception of Drudge and the wingnut blogs that no one takes seriously anyway, sucks as hard as Politico sucks.

One of their guys sneered at me like an Eddie Haskell wanna-be when we met up in the Big Tent in Denver. Gave me great pleasure, it did, to tell him what his blog is worth to me -- not a rat's ass, that's for sure.

If Politico disappeared from the internets tomorrow, we'd all be better off. The faux non-partisanship wears thin when you're fellating the GOP all day ...

An unscripted campaign would be more interesting and more useful to voters...

Senator Biden has not disappointed anyone.

There's a third possibility: they could turn Politico into a serious news organization.

The response to that suggestion would be, it just won't sell, we wouldn't get the attention, we'd go out of business. The evidence cited for that point of view would be, this is what everybody does and it sells, and when organizations don't do it they die -- we're giving the people what they want.

The implicit assumption is that there is no market for a "serious news organization" because people are stupid &/or they can't develop a taste for it.

(There probably is also an unstated assumption that politicians, like lawyers choosing a jury, prefer their audience dumb and emotionally reactive rather than smart and rational, so the politicians would abandon any news organization that got serious.)

Whichever is true, the nub of the issue is, they're not willing to take the risk of testing those assumptions.

And so we're stuck.

He's a certifiable wing nut and was removed from the WaPo White House beat for his proven and public nuttiness.
It's been a while, but I remember wingnut finery, just liek yesterday.

"And so we're stuck."

Actually I don't feel stuck at all. The only time I read anything from Politico is when someone is pointing out their bullshit and links to them.

The lack of press access to both candidates this fall is frustrating.

Love the false equivalency, but I wouldn't expect anything less from them.

If you read the comments there (& somehow manage not to claw your eyes out) you have to realize the audience they've built just ain't ready for reality.

Sinfonian,

let me guess, you are referring to Ben Smith. Oh he's the worst at Politico.

((If you read the comments there (& somehow manage not to claw your eyes out) you have to realize the audience they've built just ain't ready for reality.))


You know, that is so true. Politico has the dumbest, most obnoxious commenters of any major Internet news site. I always feel the need of disinfectant after I go over there. I can't imagine hanging out there on a regular basis, rather than an occasional foray following a link. Teh stupid on that site is depressing.

"I'm glad they're publicly making the case -- they have, to be sure, a unique credibility -- but I'd be even more glad to see them start trying to change the game."

I disagree. If punditoids "publicly (make) the case" for better reporting and then do nothing about it although they're in a position to do something about it, then they're either weaklings or hypocrites.

The reason the press is jumping all over McCain and Palin gaffes IS that their campaign is so tightly scripted. That means that the gaffes or whatever are either planned or the two candidates really, really stupid. I think the latter.

For once, though, the media are doing their jobs.

The other night on Hardball Chris Matthews raved about how "fantastic" Politico is.

actually, it's a handy gauge of how the Corp Media will play - we no longer have to wait for Tweety or the next morning's WaPo - just go on over to the school paper at Kewl Kidz High

still chortle at the idea of "subscribing" to Mike Allen

Ezra, as you no doubt recall Harris sooling the WaPo Ombudstravesty onto Froomkin, and why, let me compliment you on your politeness. You are a saint.

Post a comment



Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Search for:

About Ezra Klein

Ezra Klein is an associate editor at The American Prospect. An archive of his articles for The American Prospect can be found here.

Email | RSS | Twitter

Link Blog:


Renew your print subscription or e-subscription.
Get an e-subscription for $14.95.
Give the gift of political insight. Send The American Prospect to a friend.
Change your email address or street address.
YES! I want to receive The American Prospect
— the essential source for progressive ideas.
Explore The American Prospect's award-winning investigative journalism and provocative essays in a free trial issue. Continue receiving The American Prospect at only $19.95 for a one-year subscription - a savings of 60% off the newsstand price!
First Name
Last Name
Address 1
Address 2
City
State
ZIP     
Email

Should you decide not to continue receiving the magazine after the initial free issue, simply write "cancel" on the invoice and you will not be billed.

© 2010 by The American Prospect, Inc.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Permissions and Reprints