WE COME TO PRAISE FAMOUS MEN.
Harold Meyerson on Henry Waxman:
Waxman is a legislative genius. Most of his legislative accomplishments came before the 1994 Republican takeover of Congress, when he chaired the health and environment subcommittee of Energy and Commerce. Progressive legislating has been pretty much off the table since then, which is why he shifted focus to Congress's chief investigative committee. Those who have served in Congress for fewer than 14 years weren't around when Waxman greatly strengthened the Clean Air Act and authored the legislation that expanded Medicaid coverage to the poorest children (enlisting Republican abortion-foe Henry Hyde as his partner in the effort). They didn't see Waxman steer to passage the bills that gave rise to the generic drug industry, required uniform nutrition labels on food, heightened standards of care at nursing homes, created screening programs for breast and cervical cancer, provided health care for people with HIV/AIDS, or expanded Medicaid coverage to the working poor.For a more in-depth look at Waxman in the direct aftermath of his heyday, see, uh, Harold Meyerson's 1994 article profiling The Lion in Winter.In the midst of the Reagan era's cutbacks, Waxman expanded the number of working poor eligible for Medicaid a stunning 24 times. He consistently won key Republican backing for these regulatory and programmatic expansions. In fact, the Wall Street Journal's editorial page ran a series of articles complaining of "the Waxman state," in which, horror of horrors, businesses were compelled to meet environmental and consumer protection standards.
Some of Waxman's achievements were to keep bad things from happening. For virtually the entire 1980s, Waxman blocked Dingell and the Reagan administration from weakening auto emission standards. At one point, he blocked a key vote on a bill to debilitate the Clean Air Act by introducing 600 amendments, which he had wheeled into the room in shopping carts. Waxman also led the war on secondhand cigarette smoke. He publicized an obscure EPA report that established secondhand smoke as a carcinogen, uncovered the onetime Philip Morris lab director who had determined that nicotine was addictive, and publicly grilled tobacco company CEOs about their failure to share that fact with the public.
Feeds: 


COMMENTS (4)
Some of the things in that article read like Chuck Norris Facts.
Posted by: Neil the Ethical Werewolf | November 20, 2008 1:35 PM
Waxman [...] authored the legislation that expanded Medicaid coverage to the poorest children (enlisting Republican abortion-foe Henry Hyde as his partner in the effort). (emphasis added by me)
Now what is this called again? When a Democrat and a Republican transcend ideological divides and work together toward a common cause?
Oh yes, "bipartisanship".
Note to the reflexively bipartisanophile media. Joe Lieberman being pally-pally with John McCain and selling out progressive causes he claims to support is NOT the (only) exemplar of bipartisanship. Bipartisan =/= mealy-mouthed centrist.
Find "partisan politics" beneath you if you must, but do not assume that being a fire-breathing liberal-lefty pinko Democrat precludes bipartisanship. Unless you are trying to support something else under the guise of bipartisanship ... as is the case with the so-called liberal media.
Posted by: DAS | November 20, 2008 1:57 PM
Man that article was awesome. I love how the article seems to be breathless over the fact that rich people are actually pretty liberal, especially on the coasts and in major cities. Rich people use subways, too.
Posted by: mark r. | November 20, 2008 2:49 PM
Waxman certainly has done some good things. He is also probably the single biggest reason why we don't have a good subway system in LA (he did the bidding of the wealthiest folks in West LA who didn't want the unwashed masses coming to their neighborhoods) and he spent way, way too much time grandstanding against tobacco companies in the 1980's and 1990's. Plus, his continued presence in Congress prevents lots of talented people from his district from getting a chance to move up the political ladder.
He's not a bad congressman, by any measure. But the real picture isn't as one-dimensional as Meyerson paints it.
Posted by: Dilan Esper | November 20, 2008 5:43 PM