RSS Feeds Feeds: Articles | Issues
Articles About TAP Subscribe Donate
TAPPED  |  Beat the Press

Remember Me
Forgot your password?

The symbol identifies content for paid subscribers only.


 



The group blog of The American Prospect

Why Dems Should Worry: Connecticut Edition.

Over at Newsweek, Ben Adler describes how the Republican upsets in New York City's suburbs are “an actual bad sign for the Democrats.” I’d actually look a bit farther east to include the results in Connecticut as another reason for concern.

Republicans ousted Democrats in municipal elections throughout the state, picking up seats in Stratford, Trumbull, Monroe, Darien, Guilford and other towns throughout southwestern and central Connecticut. In Stamford -- the state’s financial hub -- Michael Pavia trounced his Democratic opponent to become the city’s first Republican mayor in 14 years.

“With the economy so bad, people are looking for change,” Nancy DiNardo, the state’s Democratic Party chair, told the AP, linking the results to a broader, national repudiation of incumbents. Even so, the results don’t bode well for politically embattled Sen. Chris Dodd, who still trails leading Republican challenger Rob Simmons by over six points.

Less than two weeks ago, Obama himself traveled up to Stamford to attend a fundraising dinner for Dodd, praising his efforts to push for robust financial regulatory reform. But -- as I explained in a TNR piece earlier this year -- Dodd faces an uphill battle to dissociate himself from the deep-pocketed financial interests that reside in his state and shower him with campaign contributions, given his chairmanship of the Senate Banking Committee. And a few of yesterday’s local Connecticut races pointed to some of the political challenges that Dodd is already facing.

In Stamford’s mayoral race, for example, Pavia railed against the Democratic incumbent for favoring the financial titans over the town’s small businesses, recalling the kind of criticisms that Simmons has levied against him over the AIG bonus scandal and federal bank bailouts. Simmons, for one, has already taken the opportunity to link 2009 with 2010, blasting Dodd for being his role in the “economic meltdown and its myriad of failed responses” in the same breath that he praised yesterday’s GOP victories in the state.

To be sure, Dodd could still have an opportunity to come back if the health-care bill and robust financial regulatory reform pass successfully. And if his Banking chairmanship makes him an easy target during economic hard times, he could conversely reap political rewards if the economy recovers to the public’s satisfaction next year. Either way, though, it seems unwise to overlook yesterday’s Republican victories in Dodd’s home state as insignificant. In a state that was at ground zero of the financial crisis, with a federal lawmaker who’s tried to guide its economic recovery, local and national concerns can be one and the same.

--Suzy Khimm



COMMENTS

Someone would have to actually propose robust financial reform in order for it to pass. Right now, that's just laughable. A bill that doesn't effect half the banks in the country and a SUPER TARP bill that will funnel even more billions into the pockets of bankers.

The Democratic party is going to lose because of it's own corruption. Americans are sick of it, and Obama promised to change that. He clearly lied.

I'm sure forcing people to buy health insurance that won't work is going to really save the day! Even though it won't go into effect until 2013, and Obama is going to get blamed for ever rate increase and coverage denial from now until then.

Post a comment


Search TAPPED for:

Archives

About TAPPED

TAPPED, the Prospect's award-winning group blog, is a link-intensive collection of musings, ramblings, opinions and other assorted writing on the political developments of the day. See a list of our contributors.

| RSS | Twitter


Renew your print subscription or e-subscription.
Get an e-subscription for $14.95.
Give the gift of political insight. Send The American Prospect to a friend.
Change your email address or street address.
YES! I want to receive The American Prospect
— the essential source for progressive ideas.
Explore The American Prospect's award-winning investigative journalism and provocative essays in a free trial issue. Continue receiving The American Prospect at only $19.95 for a one-year subscription - a savings of 60% off the newsstand price!
First Name
Last Name
Address 1
Address 2
City
State
ZIP     
Email

Should you decide not to continue receiving the magazine after the initial free issue, simply write "cancel" on the invoice and you will not be billed.

© 2009 by The American Prospect, Inc.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Permissions and Reprints