EDWARDS' GAME PLAN FOR SECOND-CHOICERS

I also caught John Edwards’ speech on the Iowa State campus, and it was his standard, populist stuff. But since he and his wife, Elizabeth, and campaign manager David Bonior were all there, and Edwards did a quick press avail afterwards, I figured I would ask all three what, exactly, the Edwards’ campaign’s strategy was for turning his latent advantage as the most common second-choice preference of potential caucus goers into a victory Thursday.
When I asked Edwards what would move the second-choicers into his column, he said: “I think I’m the strongest candidate for second choice among caucus-goers, and I think one of the reasons is this very personal, passionate message of ending corporate greed and standing up for their children and their grandchildren—period. I think that’s what they’re responding to. I had people come up to me after this event today and say they came here for Sen. Clinton or Sen. Obama and now they’re for me. They just have to hear [my message], and if they hear it, they respond.”
His wife, Elizabeth Edwards, gave a slightly different response. “There are a number of things,” she told me. “One is that John has very high favorables, which means people actually like him, and the fact that when he talks about other candidates he has not gone after them personally but focused on the differences in their policies. That kind of respect for other Democrats is going to play well. People will think, ‘hey, this guy was not making personal attacks against my candidate.’” I then followed-up by asking if she thought Obama and Clinton might beat each other up akin to the infamous Howard Dean-Dick Gephardt late-stage conflagration four years ago, allowing him to come up the middle between them, she said he just needed to keep moving along on his current track.
Finally, I asked his campaign chair, former Rep. David Bonior, more specifically if he thought they would pick up some folks initially supporting Clinton or Obama on caucus night, or more support from the second-tier candidates: “It depends on the part of the state. I think Hillary is going to struggle in some of the rural areas up in the north part of the state, in the 61 counties up there because she didn’t do her work up there. So that’s possible, but I think most of ours will come from Richardson, Biden, Dodd and Kucinich.”
--Tom Schaller
Feeds: 


COMMENTS (8)
One problem: Edwards asked his people to pledge to only caucus for candidates who declined PAC/lobbyist money (i.e., himself and Obama). So I don't see where there's room to make deals.
Posted by: Adam B | January 1, 2008 5:43 PM
David Yepsen's article said that second choices wouldn't affect the outcome as they're about evenly divided.
Posted by: K. S. | January 1, 2008 8:04 PM
I see Adfam B, the Obama supporter who shows concern about Edwards all the time, showed up here.
Deal don't matter; caucus goers do.
Kucinisch has such little support as to not matter most places.
The question is whether people follow the directive. I think many are ideologically closer to Edwards.
As for other supporters, I think Adam's concern is misplaced. Whatever Biden or Richardson say, the caucus goers do not have to follow. Edwards has strong second place support.
Posted by: Tom Wells | January 1, 2008 10:44 PM
Gosh, Tom, it's good to have fans.
It's amazing how few people are actually expected to listen to John Edwards -- he demands that a former senior staffer shut down a 527, and he gets ignored.
Now, Edwards has asked his supporters to pledge not to support anyone who has received PAC/lobbyist money, and he expects supporters of those candidates to ignore his derision and support him on a second ballot anyway.
Posted by: Adam B | January 1, 2008 11:10 PM
those with second choices should pick the candidate the shuns lobbyists money, NOT the the one who takes the money, then promotes their agenda:
Barack Obama - Top Contributors
4th Exelon Corp $269,100
http://opensecrets.org/politicians/allcontrib.asp?CID=N00009638
----
Exelon operates the largest nuclear fleet in the United States, the third largest commercial nuclear fleet in the world, and is generating nuclear energy more efficiently than ever.
http://www.exeloncorp.com/aboutus/
----
Posted by: james s | January 1, 2008 11:21 PM
Way to blow your own argument out of the water with that link James S. The page openly admits that it's an amalgamation of donations since 1989!!! It's not for this presidential cycle alone. The disclaimer on the right says that the donation figures could have been from individual donors that work at the same company.
Posted by: Mark Billingsley | January 2, 2008 1:04 AM
Adam - if the staffer listened to Edwards, you;'d be among the first to post a frontpager exclaiming "SEE!? i TOLD you Edwards was coordinating with that 527!."
You can't have it both ways. Then again, you know that, which is why you pursue this ridiculous line of attack.
Posted by: drfranklives | January 2, 2008 11:44 AM
DrF: Absolutely not. It would prove no such thing.
Posted by: Adam B | January 2, 2008 12:19 PM