THE REEP DEBATE CONSIDERED.
Well, the Republican debate is done, and most of its substance was freeze-dried about 60 years ago. The arguments the candidates made against universal health care, against Obama -- these were the Republican arguments against the New Deal and the Great Society, and the prevalence of generalities was staggering. The only thing new in the Republican catechism is the nativistic backlash against immigrants, which is really the oldest card in American politics. (I'm reading a new book, Our Savage Neighbors, by a young Princeton historian, Peter Silver, that tells the tale (among other tales) of how in 17th-century colonial Pennsylvania the English hated the German immigrants who hated the Irish (Protestant) immigrants who hated the German and the English, and so on, and all wished immigration from (England, Ireland, Germany) would stop. For those seeking a mirror into the seamy side of the American past -- ladies and gentlemen, may we present the Republican Party, 2008.
--Harold Meyerson
Feeds: 


COMMENTS (3)
Harold Meyerson: there are several sites that list LogicalFallacies, and you might want to read a few of those through. After doing that, you might realize that you've committed at least one above; the conditions now have changed a bit since the 1700s. For instance, Germany is not next door to us and that country has never owned part of our country. Nor have they ever claimed a part of our population as their own. Can you list the other differences?
Posted by: TLB | January 6, 2008 12:07 AM
I'm betting he can... but he's not allowed-- unless he wants to slaughter pigs with the Mexicans for Swift Premium.
Ah ham.
Posted by: Anonymous | January 6, 2008 9:30 PM
To neglected to mention that Ron Paul was very generous in his comments about Senator Obama. That Senator Obama, like he, was against the Iraq War from the start. The big difference is that Ron Paul, if elected, would close US military bases overseas, while Senator Obama would not.
Posted by: Tom Paine | January 6, 2008 10:07 PM