RSS Feeds Feeds: Articles | Issues
Articles About TAP Subscribe Donate
TAPPED  |  Beat the Press

Remember Me
Forgot your password?

The symbol identifies content for paid subscribers only.


 



The group blog of The American Prospect

CHARLIE RANGEL ON ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE.

rangel_final.JPGRep. Charlie Rangel, chair of the House Ways and Means Committee, addressed the WE ACT conference today. His visit comes as the House just passed their $819 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. In his address he expressed no bias on the question of cap-and-trade versus carbon tax, saying no matter which is used “we will have to monitor what happens on Wall St. to make sure that what they did to us today they won’t also do to us with emissions control.” He also raised the question of whether the revenue accumulated from either (or both) would be best spent on tax relief for the working poor or on a “massive health program.”

When taking questions from the crowd he was asked if money from whatever congressional stimulus bill is signed into law would be assured for communities of color. Rangel emphasized that the House bill includes “billions for community organizations to go out and educate their people on energy efficiency.” But another questioner noted that government grants tend to disproportionally go to mainstream environmental organizations rather than smaller EJ groups.

Rangel responded by rambling off in a separate direction, discussing the upcoming Census. He similarly dodged a question about whether the green workforce development funds will benefit minority communities that need jobs most, instead riffing on the need to re-educate public school teachers.

His response to a question on how immigrant workers would figure into the new green workforce, posed by Antonio Diaz of People Organizing to Demand Environmental & Economic Rights (PODER), did eek an honest answer out of Rangel: “I wonder too.”

“It seems to me that our religious organizations need to organize,” around this issue and answer the question of “what role do they see themselves playing in society besides giving people hope and to pray? … Where is the voice of church synagogues and mosques on this moral question?”

This was, needless to say, a disappointing answer. But to be fair, it’s a question few people have the answer to. Unfair, however, to cast responsibility off on the faith community, especially when few are represented at this conference.

--Brentin Mock

(Photo courtesy Kamau Ware)



COMMENTS

Did anyone ask him about his apartments, parking arrangements, or questionable fund-raising practices?

While I applaud Congressmna Rangel for his participation in the WE ACT conferece, I'm midly dissapointed that he hedged on the question of his support for cap and trade vs. a revenue-neutral carbon-tax. The bottom line is that this country need to raise the price of carbon based fuels in a straightforward and transparent way. We need to avoid the evasion and market manipulation that plague a cap and trade system and implement a revenue-neutral carbon tax. Moreover, a carbon-tax would directly raise the price of carbon-based energy, imposing the greatest cost on those firms and forms of energy that produce the most emissions, all while providing powerful incentives for the development of new, climate-friendly technologies. www.climatetaskforce.org


expression and clarity of the information very clearly. injury topics. Thank s for my analysis. quality site.

thanks

Thank you editors for the topic.Its include a lot of useful informations.i join this blog i couldnt see unnecessary arguments and it makes us happy thnx all moderator n editors.
Thnx For Sesli Sohbet

Post a comment


Search TAPPED for:

Archives

About TAPPED

TAPPED, the Prospect's award-winning group blog, is a link-intensive collection of musings, ramblings, opinions and other assorted writing on the political developments of the day. See a list of our contributors.

| RSS | Twitter


Renew your print subscription or e-subscription.
Get an e-subscription for $14.95.
Give the gift of political insight. Send The American Prospect to a friend.
Change your email address or street address.
YES! I want to receive The American Prospect
— the essential source for progressive ideas.
Explore The American Prospect's award-winning investigative journalism and provocative essays in a free trial issue. Continue receiving The American Prospect at only $19.95 for a one-year subscription - a savings of 60% off the newsstand price!
First Name
Last Name
Address 1
Address 2
City
State
ZIP     
Email

Should you decide not to continue receiving the magazine after the initial free issue, simply write "cancel" on the invoice and you will not be billed.

© 2010 by The American Prospect, Inc.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Permissions and Reprints