CHARLIE RANGEL ON ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE.
When taking questions from the crowd he was asked if money from whatever congressional stimulus bill is signed into law would be assured for communities of color. Rangel emphasized that the House bill includes “billions for community organizations to go out and educate their people on energy efficiency.” But another questioner noted that government grants tend to disproportionally go to mainstream environmental organizations rather than smaller EJ groups.
Rangel responded by rambling off in a separate direction, discussing the upcoming Census. He similarly dodged a question about whether the green workforce development funds will benefit minority communities that need jobs most, instead riffing on the need to re-educate public school teachers.
His response to a question on how immigrant workers would figure into the new green workforce, posed by Antonio Diaz of People Organizing to Demand Environmental & Economic Rights (PODER), did eek an honest answer out of Rangel: “I wonder too.”
“It seems to me that our religious organizations need to organize,” around this issue and answer the question of “what role do they see themselves playing in society besides giving people hope and to pray? … Where is the voice of church synagogues and mosques on this moral question?”
This was, needless to say, a disappointing answer. But to be fair, it’s a question few people have the answer to. Unfair, however, to cast responsibility off on the faith community, especially when few are represented at this conference.
--Brentin Mock
(Photo courtesy Kamau Ware)
Feeds: 



COMMENTS (8)
Did anyone ask him about his apartments, parking arrangements, or questionable fund-raising practices?
Posted by: Ben Rosengart | January 30, 2009 5:58 PM
While I applaud Congressmna Rangel for his participation in the WE ACT conferece, I'm midly dissapointed that he hedged on the question of his support for cap and trade vs. a revenue-neutral carbon-tax. The bottom line is that this country need to raise the price of carbon based fuels in a straightforward and transparent way. We need to avoid the evasion and market manipulation that plague a cap and trade system and implement a revenue-neutral carbon tax. Moreover, a carbon-tax would directly raise the price of carbon-based energy, imposing the greatest cost on those firms and forms of energy that produce the most emissions, all while providing powerful incentives for the development of new, climate-friendly technologies. www.climatetaskforce.org
Posted by: SallyVCrockett | February 2, 2009 11:10 AM
Thank you
sesli sohbet
Posted by: sesli chat | September 17, 2009 9:17 PM
expression and clarity of the information very clearly. injury topics. Thank s for my analysis. quality site.
Posted by: neon tabela | October 5, 2009 11:17 AM
thanks
Posted by: web tasarım | December 16, 2009 4:51 AM
thanks
Posted by: vakıf | December 16, 2009 4:57 AM
thanks
Posted by: web tasarim | December 16, 2009 5:20 AM
Thank you editors for the topic.Its include a lot of useful informations.i join this blog i couldnt see unnecessary arguments and it makes us happy thnx all moderator n editors.
Thnx For Sesli Sohbet
Posted by: Sesli Chat | February 4, 2010 9:55 AM