RSS Feeds Feeds: Articles | Issues
Articles About TAP Subscribe Donate
TAPPED  |  Beat the Press

Remember Me
Forgot your password?

The symbol identifies content for paid subscribers only.


 



The group blog of The American Prospect

I'LL SHOW YOU A TOTAL CROCK.

A few weeks ago, General Motors vice chairman Bob Lutz told reporters that he thinks global warming is a "total crock of shit." But he attested that he's "a skeptic, not a denier," and that his opinion "doesn’t matter" when it comes to what goes down at GM. After the blogosphere lashed out against Lutz's statements, he took to GM's own blog to defend his remarks:

What they should be doing, in earnest, is forming opinions not about me but about GM, and what this company is doing that is -- and will continue to be -- hugely beneficial to the very causes they so enthusiastically claim to support.

The Wall Street Journal weighed in on the issue earlier this week and concluded that the company's actions are more important than Lutz's opinions. Which is, of course, the real crock, considering how much GM has done to thwart action on climate change and greenwash their own image. They've been one of the big forces in ensuring that the country invests heavily in corn-based ethanol, and they've been a leading opponent of any increases to fuel efficiency standards. They've worked against states like California and now Minnesota and Arizona who are trying to set tougher emissions standards for automobiles. They might be working on a neat plug-in hybrid electric car, but they've been using it to lobby against higher CAFE standards. So yes, actions do speak louder than words – especially when those actions defy all that greenwashing GM has been trying to do.

--Kate Sheppard



COMMENTS

Denali. 12 mpg.

Escalade. 12 mpg.

Another opponent of higher efficiency standards: The UAW.

the UAW

Oh, right. Because between GM's executives and management, and the line workers, it's the line workers that have made out like bandits during GM's decline.

Or is it because the line workers were the ones who made all those decisions that led to the decline, and so, since the line-workers' compensation is based on reward-for-risk and reward-for-success, it's only just that the lineworkers take the fall.

Although I think he expressed his opinion in an unacceptably crude manner, I do believe he is right. There are more and more qualified scientists every month speaking out against the idea of man-made global warming and pointing to the increasing evidence that simply doesn't fit the global warming model.

Post a comment


Search TAPPED for:

Archives

About TAPPED

TAPPED, the Prospect's award-winning group blog, is a link-intensive collection of musings, ramblings, opinions and other assorted writing on the political developments of the day. See a list of our contributors.

| RSS | Twitter


Renew your print subscription or e-subscription.
Get an e-subscription for $14.95.
Give the gift of political insight. Send The American Prospect to a friend.
Change your email address or street address.
YES! I want to receive The American Prospect
— the essential source for progressive ideas.
Explore The American Prospect's award-winning investigative journalism and provocative essays in a free trial issue. Continue receiving The American Prospect at only $19.95 for a one-year subscription - a savings of 60% off the newsstand price!
First Name
Last Name
Address 1
Address 2
City
State
ZIP     
Email

Should you decide not to continue receiving the magazine after the initial free issue, simply write "cancel" on the invoice and you will not be billed.

© 2010 by The American Prospect, Inc.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Permissions and Reprints