RSS Feeds Feeds: Articles | Issues
Articles About TAP Subscribe Donate
TAPPED  |  Beat the Press

Remember Me
Forgot your password?

The symbol identifies content for paid subscribers only.


 



The group blog of The American Prospect

LET'S CALL THE COAL THING OFF.

It seems Wall Street is realizing that investing in coal-fired power plants is a bad long-term strategy, and that a cap on carbon emissions is inevitable. Three of the biggest investment banks -- Citigroup, J.P. Morgan Chase, and Morgan Stanley -- announced this week that they're creating new environmental standards that will make it more difficult for companies to secure investments for new coal-fired power plants. The standards will require utility companies seeking funds to build new plants to demonstrate that the plants will be economically viable under carbon constraints, and mandates that new plants take actions to be more energy-efficient, incorporate renewable energy sources, or put in place carbon capture and storage technology. The fact that major financial institutions are realizing that coal is becoming an expensive, dirty habit is very good news in the battle against climate change.

This comes at the heels of last week's announcement from the Department of Energy's announcement that they're pulling funding for FutureGen, the project that was supposed to develop the country's first "clean coal" power plant (and, it should be noted, was pretty much the sum total of Bush's misguided "plans" for addressing global warming). After the costs of the program shot up to $1.8 billion, the Energy Department decided the project was too expensive. Enviro groups have been arguing for some time, that clean coal is both too expensive and not a practical long-term solution to emissions concerns -- not to mention all the known environmental and health concerns related to mining coal.

Could these recent moves signal the beginning of the end for coal? Here's hoping.

--Kate Sheppard



COMMENTS

It could be the end of _burning_ coal. When all the oil and gas has been burnt we'll be happy to have some source of carbon for organic chemistry like plastic.

So did Gov. Schweitzer give up on his own clean-coal ideas?

greeeaattt...and we're supposed to applaud something that will mean higher energy prices for the average American? I thought Tapped was looking out for the working man.

nice
post
title
!

Not to be a pill, but I seriously doubt it. Known coal reserves are 20 to 40% higher than known petroleum reserves, and with no serious investment in research on alternate energy sources (nuclear, wind, etc.), I don't see coal going away any time soon.

Of course, I could be wrong and seriously hope I am.

"Could these recent moves signal the beginning of the end for coal? Here's hoping."

No these moves are a sign that we will be moving into an era of wide spread electricity shortages and sky rocketing utility rates.

Post a comment


Search TAPPED for:

Archives

About TAPPED

TAPPED, the Prospect's award-winning group blog, is a link-intensive collection of musings, ramblings, opinions and other assorted writing on the political developments of the day. See a list of our contributors.

| RSS | Twitter


Renew your print subscription or e-subscription.
Get an e-subscription for $14.95.
Give the gift of political insight. Send The American Prospect to a friend.
Change your email address or street address.
YES! I want to receive The American Prospect
— the essential source for progressive ideas.
Explore The American Prospect's award-winning investigative journalism and provocative essays in a free trial issue. Continue receiving The American Prospect at only $19.95 for a one-year subscription - a savings of 60% off the newsstand price!
First Name
Last Name
Address 1
Address 2
City
State
ZIP     
Email

Should you decide not to continue receiving the magazine after the initial free issue, simply write "cancel" on the invoice and you will not be billed.

© 2009 by The American Prospect, Inc.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Permissions and Reprints