RSS Feeds Feeds: Articles | Issues
Articles About TAP Subscribe Donate
TAPPED  |  Beat the Press

Remember Me
Forgot your password?

The symbol identifies content for paid subscribers only.


 



The group blog of The American Prospect

WHITHER EMPLOYEE FREE CHOICE?

Today, hundreds of union members and their leaders from across the labor spectrum gathered on Capitol Hill to deliver 1.5 million signed cards from people around the nation supporting the Employee Free Choice Act to members of congress. Leo Gerard, head of the United Steel Workers, acted as master of ceremonies, introducing other labor leaders, including the AFL-CIO's John Sweeney and Change to Win's Andy Stern, and Richard Trumka, the Secretary-Treasurer of the AFL-CIO.

The main focus of the event, however, was on several union members who had arrived in Washington to provide first-hand testimony about the problems of current labor law; some will be here lobbying on the Hill for several weeks. Several had been fired for their organizing activities, and talked about how Employee Free Choice Act would prevent that by giving workers the ability to by-pass the intimidation of an NLRB election process and increasing penalties on employers who violate labor law. Asela Espiritu, a nurse from California, came to speak about her successful organizing campaign at a Kaiser Permanente facility -- Kaiser recognizes majority sign-up as part of a national organizing neutrality agreement -- and the benefits that both management and employees accrued from having a union. Theo Jackson, who worked as a case manager at substance abuse clinic in California, was fired after he lead an organizing campaign through a successful election; now his case for wrongful firing is pending before the NLRB even as he and his colleagues fight for their first contract.

"I'm putting a face on all of the members," Jackson told me. "When companies do something, nobody knows, they want the people who get fired to slink away in shame. The very next day, I was in front of the gate, waving at the executive director."

Politically, it looks like both the House and Senate versions of the EFCA bill, which will not have substantially changed since the last attempt to pass it in 2007, will be introduced in the coming weeks, according to Senator Tom Harkin, who has been tasked by Senate Health Education and Labor Committee Chair Ted Kennedy with managing the bill, and Representative George Miller, the lead House sponsor. Walking to a Senate Democratic lunch with President Barack Obama, Harkin suggested the delay on introducing the legislation was related to Al Franken's continuing legal battle over Minnesota's senate election. The senator also expects the nomination of Hilda Solis for Secretary of Labor will clear the Senate before the Easter recess.

But the extent of the President Obama's participation in the run-up the legislation remains ambiguous; though both Harkin and Miller plan to pass the bill by the end of the year, Harkin framed the issue by quoting the president as saying, "You pass it, I'll sign it." Given that it will require a good deal of political capital to peel off the necessary votes for cloture, the current hands-off approach by the administration on this specific bill could raise concern among majority sign-up supporters, though labor officials and legislators remain confident in the president's support for the legislation.

-- Tim Fernholz



COMMENTS

Taking away the employee's rights for a Secret Ballot???? This is what the "Employee Free Choice Act" does . . . I read the Act myself! Taking away the right for empoyees secret ballot . . what kind of a"Free Choice" does this offer? The ONLY FREE CHOICE in this ACT is for the US Senators that we elect to vote this Bill down. Why would our Legislators want to take our rights for a secret ballot away from us? Sadly, many of them will vote to do so because Unions turned out to get them elected. The price - our freedom, our freedom to keep our right to a secret ballot. Is this still America?????????

Um, could you be any more dramatic?

My biggest problem with this is who they are targeting. Once this bill becomes law, they will go after McDonalds and WalMart.

Say they win. Two things occur: First, education will go down. When high school students are given the choice between going to college and working at WalMart or McDonalds (that will provide living wages, health insurance, pension, etc.) where you can retire at 48? The choice is not that hard. I remember these jobs as consequences for doing poorly in school.
Lastly, the increase in prices (costs will be passed to consumers) will effect have the biggest effect on the poor.
Thank you for reading.

Post a comment


Search TAPPED for:

Archives

About TAPPED

TAPPED, the Prospect's award-winning group blog, is a link-intensive collection of musings, ramblings, opinions and other assorted writing on the political developments of the day. See a list of our contributors.

| RSS | Twitter


Renew your print subscription or e-subscription.
Get an e-subscription for $14.95.
Give the gift of political insight. Send The American Prospect to a friend.
Change your email address or street address.
YES! I want to receive The American Prospect
— the essential source for progressive ideas.
Explore The American Prospect's award-winning investigative journalism and provocative essays in a free trial issue. Continue receiving The American Prospect at only $19.95 for a one-year subscription - a savings of 60% off the newsstand price!
First Name
Last Name
Address 1
Address 2
City
State
ZIP     
Email

Should you decide not to continue receiving the magazine after the initial free issue, simply write "cancel" on the invoice and you will not be billed.

© 2010 by The American Prospect, Inc.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Permissions and Reprints