RSS Feeds Feeds: Articles | Issues
Articles About TAP Subscribe Donate
TAPPED  |  Beat the Press

Remember Me
Forgot your password?

The symbol identifies content for paid subscribers only.


 



The group blog of The American Prospect

CHILD POVERTY AND THE EDUCATION WARS.

Matt Yglesias flags this Washington Post report on research showing that poverty creates so much stress in children's lives that it leads to permanent cognitive impairment, including a depleted short-term memory. According to one study, kids who experienced long-term poverty scored 20 percent lower on memory tests than kids whose families were never poor.

All this suggests that the coalition of education experts that calls itself the Broader, Bolder Approach was barking up the right tree during election season, when it formed to discuss how poverty and inequality deplete student academic achievement. It was another education reform effort, however -- the Education Equality Project -- that created the bigger media splash. The pro-charter schools and merit pay group, headed by New York City schools Chancellor Joel Klein and the Rev. Al Sharpton, counted rising Democratic political stars such as Mayor Cory Booker of Newark and Mayor Adrian Fenty of D.C. among its ranks, as well as conservatives such as Newt Gingrich, Jeb Bush, and former Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings. And of course, everyone loves a story of opposites attracting.

Last week, the Klein/Sharpton project held a convention in New York. Barack Obama's education secretary, Arne Duncan, attended, and participants debated whether Mayor Mike Bloomberg should continue to control the New York City public schools. But on Wednesday, the Daily News' Juan Gonzalez broke the story that Sharpton had accepted a $500,000 donation to his tax-troubled non-profit group, the National Action Network, in exchange for his involvement with the EEP. Indeed, Sharpton's headliner role with the reformist coalition had always surprised education experts. In the past, Sharpton's work had been heavily supported by teachers' unions, which identify more with the Broader, Bolder approach.

In other words, the science and politics at play in the education wars remain fascinating. There is no reason, of course, why a societal approach to alleviating poverty can't go hand in hand with support for charter schools and greater innovation in how to recruit, train, and pay teachers. There is a natural synthesis between the views of these two competing education reform groups. But in reality, the personalities involved -- Sharpton, Randi Weingarten, Bloomberg, Michelle Rhee -- are big and complex, and have been sparring for years.

--Dana Goldstein



COMMENTS

Thanks for flagging this item. Somerby at the Daily Howler makes this point all the time, namely, that educational reform without reference to the social and economic circumstances of actual students is doomed to failure. It's rare, though, that someone more "mainstream" actually points out this complexity instead of insisting that some narrow process device (breaking the unions, standardized tests, higher educational standards, charter schools) is the route to educational nirvana. Keep it up!

Yes, but the Broader, Bolder Approach is explicitly about creating that synthesis. That's why it is called "broader." There is very little rhetorical (if any) space between compromising between the two approaches and admitting that the Broader approach is correct.

Also, Randi Weingarten did not sign Broader, Bolder, so which side she's on is a little ambiguous.

What have the broader, bolder bunch done for the el-hi enterprise other than agree to agree?

Where is the transparent responsibility by the unaccountables at the top of the Edchain?

Nowhere other than in the education sector does the buck start and stop at the bottom.

Post a comment


Search TAPPED for:

Archives

About TAPPED

TAPPED, the Prospect's award-winning group blog, is a link-intensive collection of musings, ramblings, opinions and other assorted writing on the political developments of the day. See a list of our contributors.

| RSS | Twitter


Renew your print subscription or e-subscription.
Get an e-subscription for $14.95.
Give the gift of political insight. Send The American Prospect to a friend.
Change your email address or street address.
YES! I want to receive The American Prospect
— the essential source for progressive ideas.
Explore The American Prospect's award-winning investigative journalism and provocative essays in a free trial issue. Continue receiving The American Prospect at only $19.95 for a one-year subscription - a savings of 60% off the newsstand price!
First Name
Last Name
Address 1
Address 2
City
State
ZIP     
Email

Should you decide not to continue receiving the magazine after the initial free issue, simply write "cancel" on the invoice and you will not be billed.

© 2009 by The American Prospect, Inc.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Permissions and Reprints