KEEPING TEACH FOR AMERICA IN PERSPECTIVE.
New research out of North Carolina seems to confirm earlier studies showing that Teach for America teachers are a bit more effective than teachers who come out of traditional teachers' colleges. That's good news, as it justifies the program's recent expansion to new regions, such as Boston. Indeed, the argument that alternative teacher certification programs cheat needy kids out of good, dedicated instructors is quickly being neutralized.
Nevertheless, fewer than 15 percent of TFA corps members remain in the classroom after four years, even if they stay, broadly, within the field of education. So amid good news about the program, we still need to keep TFA in perspective -- it simply isn't a fix-all for the American education system. There are about 5,000 TFA teachers nationwide, but 2.5 million teachers in the United States. In New York City, which has a high concentration of TFA teachers -- 1,000 of them, to be exact -- the program reaches 60,000 kids. But there are 1.1 million children in the New York City public schools.
When it comes to improving teacher quality, policy makers must have a plan beyond increasing the number of elite college graduates in the profession. That is TFA's model, and it works well on a relatively small scale. Increases in the starting salary for teachers and in performance pay may attract even more academically talented young people to the profession. But in reality, the majority of American teachers are still trained at local teachers' colleges that do not have particularly competitive admissions processes. Those institutions need to be brought into the policy conversation, and ought to be more actively regulated in terms of the training they are providing to the people who teach our kids. States that commit themselves to this project would be good candidates for grants from the $5 billion "race to the top" fund that is part of the stimulus package.
--Dana Goldstein
Feeds: 


COMMENTS (5)
The education "crisis" in this country will never be fixed until the STATUS of teaching as a profession is enhanced. One major componenet of this is obviously pay.
Back in the day, it was Doctor, Lawyer, Teacher.
Now it's Hedge Fund Manager, Pop Star, Politician.
Who wants to be a teacher when you top out at $65K a year...?
Who wants to be a teacher when you're the devil incarnate if you smoke a joint on the weekend...?
Who wants to be a teacher with every brainwashed conservative redneck blaming you for all the ills of society...?
In the high-class exurbs populated by our rich conservative ranters, the folks who teach their children are just hired help, like the folks who cuts the lawns and clean the houses.
As a nation, despite all the big talk, it's pretty clear that we don't value education - after all, educated people don't believe that the universe was created in a puff of magic 5000 years ago, and we can't have that.
Folks who teach are expected to accept a life of low status, bad pay, difficult working conditions, invasion of privacy, actual physical danger, and - BONUS...! - acting as the all-purpose whipping-boy for the entire nation.
Sign me up....!
The problem with education is PARENTS. It's just that not one has the balls to say it out loud.
Posted by: steveconga | April 10, 2009 1:26 PM
I am veteran teacher from Houston seeking a dialogue with current and past Teach for America teachers regarding what appears to be a pattern of TFA leaders and alumni in school district leadership positions espousing conservative ideas and profiting from close relationships with reactionary corporations, while self-righteously proclaiming they are the new civil rights movement. I first became aware of this when a former local TFA Director, now a school board member, recently proposed to fire teachers based on test scores and opposed allowing us to vote to have a single union.
The conservative-TFA nexus began at the beginning, when Union Carbide sponsored Wendy Kopp's initial efforts to create Teach for America. A few years before, Union Carbide's negligence had caused the worst industrial accident in history, in Bhopal, India. The number of casualties was as large as 100,000, and Union Carbide did everything possible to minimize taking responsibility for the event. Not only did Union Carbide provide financial support for Ms. Kopp, it provided her with other corporate contacts and office space for her and her staff.
A few years later, when TFA faced severe financial difficulties, Ms. Kopp wrote in her book she nearly went to work for the Edison Project, and was all but saved by their managerial assistance. The Edison Project, founded by a Tennessee entrepreneur, was an effort to replace public schools run by elected school boards with for-profit, corporate-run schools.
In 2000, two brilliant TFA alumni, the founders of KIPP Academy, then joined the Bush's at the Republican National Convention in 2000. This was vital to Bush, since as Governor he did not really have any genuine education achievements, and he was trying to prove he was a different kind of Republican. And everyone knows about Michelle Rhee's prescription for improving education, close schools rather than improving them, and fire teachers rather than inspiring them.
Wendy Kopp's idea for Teach for America was a good one. TFA teachers do great work. But its leaders often seem to blame teachers, public schools and teachers' organizations for the achievement gap. By blaming teachers for some deep-seated social problems this nation has, they are not only providing an inaccurate critique, they feed conservatives more ammunition to use in their twenty-eight year war against using government as a problem solver.
Our achievement gap mirrors our country's level of economic inequality, the greatest among affluent nations. Better schools are only part of the solution. Stable families are more able to be ambitious for their children than insecure, overworked and struggling ones. Our society has failed our schools by permitting the middle class to shrink.(It's not the other way around.) As more people are starting to recognize, we need national health care, a stronger union movement, long-term unemployment benefits, generous college funding, trade policy and reductions in military spending to bolster the middle class.
Ms. Kopp claims to be in the tradition of the civil rights movement, but Martin Luther King would take principled positions—against the Vietnam War and for the Poor Peoples March—even when it pissed off powerful people. His final speech, the night of his assassination, was on behalf of striking Memphis sanitation workers. In his last book, he argued for modifying American capitalism to include some measure of wealth distribution. I would like a dialogue about what I have written here. My e-mail is JesseAlred@yahoo.com. You as an individual TFA teacher has a responsibility here because your work alone gives TFA leaders credibility (its not the other way around.)
Posted by: JesseAlred | April 10, 2009 7:50 PM
I am veteran teacher from Houston seeking a dialogue with current and past Teach for America teachers regarding what appears to be a pattern of TFA leaders and alumni in school district leadership positions espousing conservative ideas and profiting from close relationships with reactionary corporations, while self-righteously proclaiming they are the new civil rights movement. I first became aware of this when a former local TFA Director, now a school board member, recently proposed to fire teachers based on test scores and opposed allowing us to vote to have a single union.
The conservative-TFA nexus began at the beginning, when Union Carbide sponsored Wendy Kopp's initial efforts to create Teach for America. A few years before, Union Carbide's negligence had caused the worst industrial accident in history, in Bhopal, India. The number of casualties was as large as 100,000, and Union Carbide did everything possible to minimize taking responsibility for the event. Not only did Union Carbide provide financial support for Ms. Kopp, it provided her with other corporate contacts and office space for her and her staff.
A few years later, when TFA faced severe financial difficulties, Ms. Kopp wrote in her book she nearly went to work for the Edison Project, and was all but saved by their managerial assistance. The Edison Project, founded by a Tennessee entrepreneur, was an effort to replace public schools run by elected school boards with for-profit, corporate-run schools.
In 2000, two brilliant TFA alumni, the founders of KIPP Academy, then joined the Bush's at the Republican National Convention in 2000. This was vital to Bush, since as Governor he did not really have any genuine education achievements, and he was trying to prove he was a different kind of Republican. And everyone knows about Michelle Rhee's prescription for improving education, close schools rather than improving them, and fire teachers rather than inspiring them.
Wendy Kopp's idea for Teach for America was a good one. TFA teachers do great work. But its leaders often seem to blame teachers, public schools and teachers' organizations for the achievement gap. By blaming teachers for some deep-seated social problems this nation has, they are not only providing an inaccurate critique, they feed conservatives more ammunition to use in their twenty-eight year war against using government as a problem solver.
Our achievement gap mirrors our country's level of economic inequality, the greatest among affluent nations. Better schools are only part of the solution. Stable families are more able to be ambitious for their children than insecure, overworked and struggling ones. Our society has failed our schools by permitting the middle class to shrink.(It's not the other way around.) As more people are starting to recognize, we need national health care, a stronger union movement, long-term unemployment benefits, generous college funding, trade policy and reductions in military spending to bolster the middle class.
Ms. Kopp claims to be in the tradition of the civil rights movement, but Martin Luther King would take principled positions—against the Vietnam War and for the Poor Peoples March—even when it pissed off powerful people. His final speech, the night of his assassination, was on behalf of striking Memphis sanitation workers. In his last book, he argued for modifying American capitalism to include some measure of wealth distribution. I would like a dialogue about what I have written here. My e-mail is JesseAlred@yahoo.com. You as an individual TFA teacher has a responsibility here because your work alone gives TFA leaders credibility (its not the other way around.)
Posted by: JesseAlred | April 10, 2009 7:51 PM
"New research out of North Carolina seems to confirm earlier studies showing that Teach for America teachers are a bit more effective than teachers who come out of traditional teachers' colleges."
So kids who go to elite colleges and learn to teach in a quick summer program are slightly better teachers than the men and women who spend 4 years in college learning about education?
hmmm, let's see if we can identify the wrong conclusions that can be drawn here?
Posted by: WestIndianArchie | April 11, 2009 8:50 AM
Wendy Kopp--like her friends, our nation's corporate leaders--preaches but does not practice accountability when she claims Teach For America and its branches, the KIPP and YES charter schools, have done jack to close the achievement gap.
Education professors argue whether 40% or 20% of TFA teachers remain in school past the requisite two-year stint, but neither advocates or enemies of TFA have presented ANY evidence of them improving the academic results of significant numbers of working-class, minority students.
The only argument they have comes from the outstanding perfomance of kids at KIPP and YES, and these students attend charter schools after their families have applied to schools with longer school days, extended school years, and loads of homework.
Teach For America provides a positive service, and its charter schools provide a top-quality education for kids whose ambitious familees are already committed to education.
The notion that these folks are the solution not only to school reform but to social reform also must derive from an equal mixture of egotism, careerism, the rich-person's sense of entitlement, stupidity and the desire to please government-hating corporate donors.
Posted by: JesseAlred | April 17, 2009 11:28 PM