PUBLIC MEDIA 2.0 ROUNDTABLE: REINVIGORATING PUBLIC MEDIA.
How can citizenry be engaged across different platforms? Today, the Prospect considers public media 2.0 and asks experts about its future.
Josh Silver is the executive editor and cofounder of Free Press, an organization that advocates for diverse and independent media ownership, strong public media, and universal access to communications.
The decline of U.S. commercial journalism, combined with new technology and digital innovations, presents an unprecedented opportunity for public media to be reinvented as go-to sources for journalism, education, arts, culture, and local programming.
We’ve all seen the headlines. Newspapers are rapidly losing print circulation and advertising dollars while laying off employees en masse (there were more than 20,000 layoffs since the beginning of 2008). Television networks air cheap reality programs instead of substantive investigative reporting. Commercial radio is dominated by screaming pundits, and, like television, is nearly devoid of substantive or local reporting.
Leadership on public media is needed now – both in local communities and in Washington. Our biggest obstacle isn’t money or technology; it’s imagining the alternatives and harnessing the political will to make them a reality.
Three major reforms that would reinvigorate public media after the jump.
Related: Jessica Clark and Patricia Aufderheide offer their vision for building a new national network, and a group of media experts discuss the challenges faced by public media 2.0.
--Josh Silver
So how do we do it? The creation of a public-media trust could be
funded through a number of means, ranging from a simple congressional
appropriation, to a tax on commercial broadcasters, to a spectrum-use
fee for companies profiting from the public airwaves.
Funding
is vital both for enabling public media to produce more high-quality
content and for protecting public broadcasters from undue political
pressures inherent to the annual congressional appropriations process.
It would also help alleviate the negative influences associated with
corporate underwriting of public media: namely, a reluctance to
challenge the status quo or offend the sponsors.
Diversity and Expansion: Public media are overrun with what historian Eric Barnouw referred to as “splendidly safe” programming. While Antiques Road Show
and Lawrence Welk specials appeal to a certain audience, public media’s
current range of programming has little mass appeal to new communities,
especially racial and ethnic minorities.
While media
technology has advanced dramatically since the advent of public
broadcasting, much of America remains unaware of the expansive variety
of public media. Public media include a range of outlets and formats –
including community radio and public access TV, muckraking magazines
and independent producers – whose mission is to serve the public, not
to earn a profit. Offering an alternative to mainstream media, this
noncommercial sector aims to educate and engage audiences.
Harness the Digital Revolution:
Public media require a 21st-century infrastructure to prosper in the
digital age. This means building a national broadband backbone that
would connect public media outlets with libraries, schools, public
access channels, community organizations, and one another.
We
must invest in creating tools that will make public media more dynamic
and participatory, and we must put the vast libraries of public-media
content online and into the hands of the public. We need to develop new
platforms – from iPhone apps to open-source multimedia players – for
all public media entities to use on their Web sites. We must get more
hardware and software to stations to enable and embolden new media,
innovative journalism, and creative production on all levels.
Feeds: 



COMMENTS (2)
One possible role for public media is to serve as a supplement to newspapers now and replacements when/if newspapers fail. In Minnesota where I live, I have been urging the governor and the Legislature to prepare for the day when the Minneapolis-based Star Tribune and St. Paul Pioneer Press just might disappear. I have urged the officials to consider publicly funding a combined news operation of the 5 stations that comprise Minnesota Public TV and the several radio stations of Minnesota Public Radio. Nothing can replace a good newspaper but my idea would give us three-million-plus Minnesotans good professional TV, radio and online news coverage. If such a working agreement (if not outright merger)of the two public broadcast media could be reached, it would serve Minnesotans well, whether the papers folded or not. It also would give the public media a much-needed financial shot in the arm.
I wonder what readers of this piece think of my idea.
Posted by: Will Shapira | May 1, 2009 9:00 AM
Sorry, but I don't see how government-funded media can provide something that isn't already provided elsewhere.
Posted by: Adam Herman | May 2, 2009 4:52 AM