RSS Feeds Feeds: Articles | Issues
Articles About TAP Subscribe Donate
TAPPED  |  Beat the Press

Remember Me
Forgot your password?

The symbol identifies content for paid subscribers only.


 



The group blog of The American Prospect

GOOD FOR HUNTSMAN, BUT NO ONE KNOWS HOW 2012 WILL SHAKE OUT.

Since I'm on semi-vacation in New Hampshire, I've more-or-less missed the ever-shrinking Blogger Commentary Time Window (BCTW) on Utah Governor Jon Huntsman's nomination as the United States Ambassador to China.

huntsman.jpg
Short version: Smart for Obama, good for Huntsman, bad for the GOP, but can a Republican faithfully represent a Democrat's foreign policy in this political climate and does this suggest that the U.S.-China relationship will continue to hew the standard establishment line? Bonus discussion question: Is that a bad thing?

Anyway, I did want to draw attention to this commentary by Christian Brose, which does a good job of laying out what Huntsman's probable assumptions are about his political future and that of his party. But readers, remember: No one has any idea how the politics of 2012 will shake out, and any political calculation based on current assumptions is just a mistake. Looking at Brose's conventional wisdom handicapping of the 2012 GOP, I don't see much to disagree with, but now we have to get into Rumsfeldian unknown unknowns territory. Remember when everyone thought George Allen was a front-runner for the 2008 GOP nomination? Hillary Clinton for the Democrats? The permanent Republican majority of 2004? The never-ending Democratic majority in Congress for most of the latter half of the prior century? You get my point. Whatever Huntsman's calculus is, I hope it isn't entirely predicated on the political climate three years from now.

On that note, I also wouldn't assume that a politician's every motivation has to do with becoming president someday, or even moving up to whatever the next notch on the ladder is (although it's not an unsafe assumption, either). North Carolina's Roy Barnes isn't running for Richard Burr's Senate seat despite a good chance he could take it, and New Hampshire's John Lynch won't run for a Senate seat that is practically a given for him. It's certainly possible that Huntsman, who has long experience in Asia and an obvious fascination with Chinese language and culture, might just covet the most important diplomatic post in the region.

-- Tim Fernholz



COMMENTS

Just nitpicking, but it's Roy Cooper who decided not to run in NC

Post a comment


Search TAPPED for:

Archives

About TAPPED

TAPPED, the Prospect's award-winning group blog, is a link-intensive collection of musings, ramblings, opinions and other assorted writing on the political developments of the day. See a list of our contributors.

| RSS | Twitter


Renew your print subscription or e-subscription.
Get an e-subscription for $14.95.
Give the gift of political insight. Send The American Prospect to a friend.
Change your email address or street address.
YES! I want to receive The American Prospect
— the essential source for progressive ideas.
Explore The American Prospect's award-winning investigative journalism and provocative essays in a free trial issue. Continue receiving The American Prospect at only $19.95 for a one-year subscription - a savings of 60% off the newsstand price!
First Name
Last Name
Address 1
Address 2
City
State
ZIP     
Email

Should you decide not to continue receiving the magazine after the initial free issue, simply write "cancel" on the invoice and you will not be billed.

© 2010 by The American Prospect, Inc.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Permissions and Reprints