RSS Feeds Feeds: Articles | Issues
Articles About TAP Subscribe Donate
TAPPED  |  Beat the Press

Remember Me
Forgot your password?

The symbol identifies content for paid subscribers only.


 



The group blog of The American Prospect

KARL ROVE'S SECOND PARAGRAPH FAIL.

So Rove, sensing a new meme in the air the way a puppy smells a side of bacon, decides that after spending weeks talking about how dangerous Obama is and how he's made the country less safe that he's going to tell everyone what a great job he's doing on national security. Rove worked in the Bush administration, but he's either so ignorant about policy that he didn't realize Obama was doing the same thing as Bush these past few weeks and needed someone else to explain it to him, or he's just making everything up as he goes along. In the second paragraph of his op-ed this morning, Rove gets it wrong (emphasis mine):

For example, President Obama kept George W. Bush's military tribunals for terror detainees after calling them an "enormous failure" and a "legal black hole." His campaign claimed last summer that "court systems . . . are capable of convicting terrorists." Upon entering office, he found out they aren't.

Here's a brief list of terrorists convicted in federal court just under the Bush administration, you know, the one Rove worked for:

  • Zacarias Moussaoui, convicted 2006
  • Masoud Khan, convicted 2004
  • Richard Reid, convicted 2003
  • Iyman Faris AKA Mohammad Rauf, convicted 2003
  • Jose Padilla, convicted 2007
  • Five of the "Fort Dix Six", convicted 2008

Since Obama has taken office, Ali Saleh al-Marri was tried and pleaded guilty to providing material support to terrorism, and five of the Liberty City plotters were convicted (they plan to appeal). The alleged perpetrators of the suspected terrorist plot foiled in New York yesterday will be tried in federal court. It's one thing to argue, as Obama has, that some detainees can't be tried in federal court because they wouldn't have enough admissible evidence to convict them, it's another entirely to claim that the courts literally "can't" try terrorists. That is an absurd claim on its face. The problem isn't the nature of federal court, the problem is the state of the government's case against the detained.

-- A. Serwer



COMMENTS

Rove quotes Obama as:

"court systems . . . are capable of convicting terrorists."

I'm kind of curious to know what was in the ellipsis, myself. If Rove were blogging scum he might have linked to an original quote, but no. Google brings up no un-snipped versions.

Post a comment


Search TAPPED for:

Archives

About TAPPED

TAPPED, the Prospect's award-winning group blog, is a link-intensive collection of musings, ramblings, opinions and other assorted writing on the political developments of the day. See a list of our contributors.

| RSS | Twitter


Renew your print subscription or e-subscription.
Get an e-subscription for $14.95.
Give the gift of political insight. Send The American Prospect to a friend.
Change your email address or street address.
YES! I want to receive The American Prospect
— the essential source for progressive ideas.
Explore The American Prospect's award-winning investigative journalism and provocative essays in a free trial issue. Continue receiving The American Prospect at only $19.95 for a one-year subscription - a savings of 60% off the newsstand price!
First Name
Last Name
Address 1
Address 2
City
State
ZIP     
Email

Should you decide not to continue receiving the magazine after the initial free issue, simply write "cancel" on the invoice and you will not be billed.

© 2009 by The American Prospect, Inc.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Permissions and Reprints