LIGHTNING ROUND: COMPASSIONATE CONSERVATISM.
- The candid bigotry coming from all corners of the right wing in the mere day since Sonia Sotomayor was nominated to the Supreme Court is just astonishing. Tom Tancredo and Newt Gingrich both believe Sotomayor is "racist," although one wonders why anyone would care what these two former lawmakers think about anything. Meanwhile, you've got the Judiciary Committee's ranking member fretting about the "threat" to the Court's "heritage" and Michael Goldfarb's racist musings on the high court's first affirmative action hire. [Ed. note: Previously, quotation marks were mistakenly placed around the phrase "affirmative action hire."] Fortunately, one conservative blogger sees an "opportunity for Republicans to reestablish their identity" and veteran movement conservatives are cuing the training montage music as the nomination reunites the movement. Helpfully, Brian Beutler reviews the figures who have the most to gain from the Sotomayor brouhaha.
- Former McCain campaign adviser Douglas Holtz-Eakin wants to build a "Center for American Progress for the right" because the GOP needs more diversity of ideas. Well, no argument here. But the CAP comparison is inaccurate, considering that conservatives already have plenty of think tanks. Kevin Drum takes this a step further, clarifying that what Holtz-Eakin really meant was that the right needs a "conservative DLC."
- Rep. Tom Price (R-GA) has a short and amateurish video out for the Republican Study Committee that argues Barack Obama is dividing the country because he won't stand with "a group of investment firms and hedge funds" who received federal bailout funds. Price then solemnly tells us that he finds it disturbing that the president would side with taxpayers instead of incompetent rich people. It's always helpful when the GOP explicitly tells us who they're looking out for.
- I'm glad Harry Reid has recognized the folly of adopting the right wing's "terrorists as supervillians" storyline, conceding that some Guantanamo detainees will need to be incarcerated in stateside supermax prisons. Max Baucus, meanwhile, has decided that it's far more accurate to portray terrorists as the brains-hungry zombies among us.
- I realize that replacing a moderate member of the Supreme Court with another moderate is a very big deal, requiring the political world's undivided attention, but it would be nice if a few spare cycles could be devoted to North Korea's increased bellicosity. Fortunately we have noted conservative intellectual Jonah Goldberg to tell us that Barack Obama would probably be unwilling to retaliate in the event of Pyongyang nuking Seoul or Los Angeles.
- Remainders: Joe Sestak throws his hat in the ring; Nate Silver doesn't see a gay marriage divide between Hispanics and whites; free market paradises get a promotional video; and The New York Times is wasting money on mustachioed columnists.
--Mori Dinauer
Feeds: 


COMMENTS (4)
While it might be inappropriate or at least premature to declare Sotomayor "a racist", who can with a straight face dispute that some of her public remarks rise or sink to the level of "racist"?
Sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander, Lefties.
Posted by: Jimbo | May 27, 2009 9:28 PM
Will TAPPED completely declare that at no point did Sotomayor benefit from affirmative action? If not, why are you surprised people would criticize her on that facet - those are exactly the aspersions you open the beneficiaries of the policies to.
Posted by: Billare | May 28, 2009 8:15 AM
noted conservative intellectual Jonah Goldberg
aka the Doughy Pantload
makes Sarah Palin look like Marie Curie
Posted by: Noam Sane | May 28, 2009 1:09 PM
Forget, please, "conservatism." It has been, operationally, de facto, Godless and therefore irrelevant. Secular conservatism will not defeat secular liberalism because to God both are two atheistic peas-in-a-pod and thus predestined to failure. As Stonewall Jackson's Chief of Staff R.L. Dabney said of such a humanistic belief more than 100 years ago:
"[Secular conservatism] is a party which never conserves anything. Its history has been that it demurs to each aggression of the progressive party, and aims to save its credit by a respectable amount of growling, but always acquiesces at last in the innovation. What was the resisted novelty of yesterday is today .one of the accepted principles of conservatism; it is now conservative only in affecting to resist the next innovation, which will tomorrow be forced upon its timidity and will be succeeded by some third revolution; to be denounced and then adopted in its turn. American conservatism is merely the shadow that follows Radicalism as it moves forward towards perdition. It remains behind it, but never retards it, and always advances near its leader. This pretended salt bath utterly lost its savor: wherewith shall it be salted? Its impotency is not hard, indeed, to explain. It is worthless because it is the conservatism of expediency only, and not of sturdy principle. It intends to risk nothing serious for the sake of the truth."
Our country is collapsing because we have turned our back on God (Psalm 9:17) and refused to kiss His Son (Psalm 2).
John Lofton, Editor, TheAmericanView.com
Recovering Republican
JLof@aol.com
PS – And “Mr. Worldly Wiseman” Rush Limbaugh never made a bigger ass of himself than at CPAC where he told that blasphemous “joke” about himself and God.
Posted by: John Lofton, Recovering Republican | May 29, 2009 11:58 PM