SONIA SOTOMAYOR: NATIONALIST.
The deeply offended Stuart Taylor discovers that as a student, Sotomayor was very concerned about violence and intimidation of gay students on campus, as she wrote a letter to the school newspaper after the rooms of two gay students were ransacked. She also signed a letter criticizing the search process for a new assistant dean of student affairs who would deal primarily with issues involving students of color. The student committee tasked with evaluating the candidates was frustrated that it only saw applications from black and Latino candidates, and never saw any applications from Asian, Native American or other minority groups. She also urged the school to make good faith efforts to hire Latino faculty and offer courses on Latino culture and history. Scandalous.
Most disturbing however, is Taylor's revelation that Sotomayor was chair of a group called "Accion Puertorriquena," (Puerto Rican Action) which I assume was a SOC group devoted to the concerns of Puerto Rican students at Princeton. She was very critical of how Princeton treated its minority students in 1974, which is absurd, because America passed the Civil Rights Act only nine years earlier and Princeton had started admitting women five years earlier. Therefore, sexism and racism were then nonexistent at the university, where certain affiliated groups were despondent with the possibility of more women and minorities on campus.
In 1973, just a year before Sotomayor engaged in her racist crusade to destroy white men at Princeton, Cullom Davis, the founder of Concerned Alumni of Princeton, wrote mournfully in the group's magazine of the days when Princeton was "a body of men, relatively homogeneous in interests and backgrounds." This was apparently fairly typical fare for CAP, which was opposed to having more women and minorities admitted to Princeton. Incidentally, the group later boasted a current Supreme Court Justice among its members. If you have a subscription to The Nation, I urge you to read the rest of Eyal Press' report on the subject.
One can very clearly imagine Taylor's counterpart in 1967 bemoaning the racialist legal background of the newest justice to be appointed to the court.
UPDATE: Interestingly enough, Mr. Taylor graduated from Princeton in 1970, just a year after the school started admitting women.
-- A. Serwer
Feeds: 



COMMENTS (29)
I'm Princeton '74. I have no memory of having met Judge Sotomayor, but I can say with some confidence that Princeton was a long way from comfortable with women, race, or much else that wasn't Old Boy.
About half of the eating clubs were still selective, and maybe five (of the dozen) were still single-sex. I heard as a freshman in 1970 a lot of complaints about coeducation; many of the male students bemoaned the loss of the "atmosphere" and "camaraderie" that obtained before women were admitted.
I do not think it was easy being a woman at Princeton before 1980 or so, doubly hard if you were minority, and triply hard if you weren't well-to-do. And she managed to win the Pyne Prize, the top undergraduate honor the school awards.
Posted by: David Derbes | May 29, 2009 3:48 PM
Alito was a member of CAP as well in the 70s.
From Wiki:
The primary motivation behind CAP was to limit the number of women admitted to the university. CAP also opposed affirmative action designed to increase minority attendance at the Ivy League institution. [1] CAP also exhibited strong support for Princeton's eating clubs, which were male-only at the time. [2] (Link dead as of 05:38, 15 January 2007 (UTC))
Posted by: erich | May 29, 2009 3:50 PM
Stuart Taylor is clearly a CAP fellow traveller.
Posted by: wmb | May 29, 2009 3:54 PM
Well, this looks like the smoking gun that might finally trigger Sotomayor's withdrawal. Anyone who complained about "an institutional pattern of discrimination" at Princeton in 1974, after the university had already let in some women and minorities, is "clearly predisposed," as Taylor impartially and objectively points out, "to look for the worst, not the best, in the institution that had afforded her such opportunities."
Also, "la raza" means "burn this mother to the ground."
Posted by: Concerned Alumni of National Journal | May 29, 2009 3:57 PM
I hear she was a great admirer of that Martin Luther King fellow, who was another one of those "look for the worst" types.
I mean, it's not like Black people didn't have the right to vote. And there this fellow was, whining how they couldn't pass the voting test...
Posted by: anon | May 29, 2009 4:03 PM
I hope that there are moderate Republicans out there who still want to save their party from becoming extinct and that can appeal to independents and moderate voters. The Republican diehards of Gingrich, Beck, Coulter, and Limbaugh are not going to revitalize their party, they are going to destroy it. Their obsession with social issues and their virulent, misguided, and false attacks on Obama's Supreme Court nominee are turning more and more voters off and unless more moderate voices can be heard and rise above the fray, the Coulters, Becks, Limbaughs, et al are going to consign the Republican Party to third rate status for a generation.
These diehards are making the majority of American people believe the Republican Party is anti gay, anti Hispanic, anti Black, anti women's rights, anti the environment and they do not understand it is 2009, not 1949. I am a moderate Democrat who has voted for Republicans in the past but everytime I see and/or hear some of these spokespersons for the Republican Party on t.v. or the radio it makes me want to run to the polls to pull the Democratic lever more than I ever have wanted to before. Someone, if they want to save the party, needs to tell Coulter, Beck, and Limbaugh to shut the hell up.
Posted by: Mark Jeffery Koch | May 29, 2009 4:04 PM
Mark: This is conservatism. If one party becomes the conservative party, then this is what they are.
Posted by: Punditus Maximus | May 29, 2009 4:26 PM
Stuart Taylor: The thinking man's (and I do mean "man's") Rush Limbaugh.
Posted by: Peter Principle | May 29, 2009 5:45 PM
Bill Campbell is right: this is inevitable....
Posted by: Steve M. | May 29, 2009 5:54 PM
Their obsession with social issues and their virulent, misguided, and false attacks on Obama's Supreme Court nominee... are going to consign the Republican Party to third rate status for a generation. -- Mark Jeffery Koch
And someone who works in the West Wing won't have to buy their own drinks for quite a while, either...
Posted by: Anonymous | May 29, 2009 5:57 PM
Um,excuse me, but the comments by Taylor have nothing to do with the gay issue. He comments exclusively on Sotomayor's apparantly justified bitching about there being nothing about Chicano or Peurto Rican culture. The homosexual bit is introduced in the comments section by someone named Amy. Unless Taylor has scrubbed his post, you're attacking him on the wrong charge.
I had always thought that liberalism was supposed to have something to do with freeing ourselves as much as possible from prejudice. If you're going to be serious about that, doncha think maybe you should get your facts straight?
Liberal intelligence indeed.
Posted by: Hieronymus Braintree | May 29, 2009 6:49 PM
Mark: This is conservatism. If one party becomes the conservative party, then this is what they are.
Basically, yes. Much as I find the braying of the Republican party offensive, I am force to concede that white racist have a right to political representation just as much as everyone else. If we were a multi-party democracy, they could be ghettoized into a minor party, but the two-party system being what it is, they have to go somewhere. It may as well be the Republicans.
Posted by: Tyro | May 29, 2009 7:13 PM
Um,excuse me, but the comments by Taylor have nothing to do with the gay issue. He comments exclusively on Sotomayor's apparantly justified bitching about there being nothing about Chicano or Peurto Rican culture. The homosexual bit is introduced in the comments section by someone named Amy. Unless Taylor has scrubbed his post, you're attacking him on the wrong charge.
I too am very concerned that Mark Jeffery Koch's comment, which does not mention Taylor but does mention Coulter, Beck, Gingrich, and Limbaugh, and which remarks for some reason that "these diehards are making the majority of American people believe the Republican Party is anti gay, anti Hispanic, anti Black, anti women's rights, anti the environment," is unfair to Stuart Taylor and therefore discredits The American Prospect and also all of liberalism forever.
Very concerned.
Posted by: Michael Bérubé | May 29, 2009 8:41 PM
Dear MB,
Thanks for your support but "[Discredits] all of liberalism forever"? That's a pretty broad statement.
Liberals can be incredibly dishonest and arrogant jerks but liberalism itself, which is a philosophy and not a political grouping, will continue to be the best political philosophy in the long run. Two years ago we were all living in the wake of the Duke lacrosse case, which was about as self-discrediting as you can get, perpetuated by people who called themselves liberal but were actually being a bunch of pretentious, absusively bigoted know-nothing jerks. A little over a year-and-a-half later Barrack Hussein Obama was elected president so, I think we can rule out permanent damage.
Besides, Republicans are our main foils and lately they've been acting like a bunch of kamakazies. Right now, the biggest threat to liberalism is, ironically, Barrack Obama himself, who seems to have forgotten no small load of constitutional law.
Posted by: Hieronymus Braintree | May 29, 2009 9:28 PM
the comments by Taylor have nothing to do with the gay issue.
Taylor does link to the letter Sotomayor signed about the anti-gay attack ("The Rights of All"), after complaining about her "predispos[ition] to look for the worst, not the best, in the institution that had afforded her such opportunities." So I think it's fair to characterize him as bringing up the gay issue.
Posted by: Matt W | May 29, 2009 10:38 PM
Dear Matt W,
Sorry, but no sale. According to Taylor, assuming he's telling a straight (no pun intended) story, he linked to every letter Sotomayer wrote as a Princeton student to the publication in question. Since he made no comment one way or the other regarding the gay issue, I don't see how it's really relevant to the above post.
Posted by: Hieronymus Braintree | May 29, 2009 10:52 PM
He graduated in 1970. What unit did this republican serve in during his tour in Vietnam?
Oh. He's a republican. I forgot.
Posted by: AJ | May 30, 2009 9:08 AM
This whole item is a big, slimy lie. I never said or implied I was offended by her defense of gays -- which in fact I admire. Nor did I criticize ANY of her other actions that you cite. I did take mild issue with her ludicrous attack on Princeton for "an institutional pattern of discrimination" designed to "relegate" Latinos "to oblivion."
Posted by: Stuart Taylor | May 30, 2009 11:09 AM
P.S. I demand that you publish a retraction and apology at least as conspicuous as the malicious falsehood published above.
Posted by: Stuart Taylor | May 30, 2009 11:47 AM
***** Five Star Comment Thread!
Posted by: Will H | May 30, 2009 7:42 PM
Speaking as a sadly disappointed liberal, my guess is they won't as liberals are almost never ever wrong especially when they are.
Of course, the same is true, in spades, of conservatives.
Paging Dr. Orwell...
Posted by: Anonymous | May 30, 2009 9:15 PM
While ordinarily one might defer to Mr. Taylor's evident expertise in malicious falsehood, the fact of the matter is that the context in which he posted his link indicated that he regarded it as an example of Judge Sotomayor attacking Princeton. If your writings are full of derogatory innuendo, blame yourself if everything you say is parsed for derogartory innuendo.
Posted by: rea | May 31, 2009 11:05 AM
hey guys, you wanna tango with ricci, sotomayor, affirmative action, and the american people? let's tango.
Posted by: Caius Iulius | June 1, 2009 8:52 PM
Are you want to own the cheapest Apple and Iphone?
Iphone Accessor
Posted by: Apple and Iphone | November 29, 2009 9:51 PM
Laptop Batteries
Laptop Batteries discount laptop battery
Posted by: Laptop Battery | December 3, 2009 1:45 AM
everybody wants to be more fashion,but thats not easy to join,you most have the fashion world view first,then you could read the fashion news,Magazines and so on. through these you can be the fashion man.
Posted by: jewelry fashion review | December 21, 2009 3:44 AM
Fitch store in general abercrombie and fitch , everything a good matrimony before marriage have nothing to retain the preceding "female mad batch - abercrombie" part of the two is the first home in new york city a horde promotion sportswear for men and it is a successful lawyer, that is, ezra fitch.Ezra fitch in a charge over a very intricate to read from the abercrombie is obstinate to read and long abercrombie & fitch. He's also very good brand hollister, including abercrombie mens and abercrombie womens, abercrombie hollister, Ruehl No.925. Has become a fashionable personage's first choice, abercrombie outlet is all over the world, of course, is also expected to 2009 New Arrivals.
Posted by: abercrombie hollister | December 31, 2009 1:51 AM
Good post! Thank for your information! China Wholesale China Wholesale Wholesale Wholesale China Wholesalers China Wholesalers Wholesale Game Accessories Wholesale Game Accessories Wholesale Iphone Accessories Wholesale Iphone Accessories Video Game Accessories Wholesale Video Game Accessories Wholesale Wholesale Wii Accessories Wholesale Wii Accessories Wholesale Xbox 360 Accessories Wholesale Xbox 360 Accessories Wholesale Xbox 360 Games Wholesale Xbox 360 Games Wholesale Video Games Wholesale Video Games Cheap Video Games Cheap Video Games Cheap Ps3 Games Cheap Ps3 Games Cheap Xbox 360 Games Cheap Xbox 360 Games Wholesale Computers Wholesale Computers Wholesale Laptop Computers Wholesale Laptop Computers Wholesale Laptops Wholesale Laptops Discount Computers Discount Computers Cheap Computers Cheap Computers Wholesale Iphones Wholesale Iphones Wholesale Iphone Wholesale Iphone Wholesale Iphones 3g Wholesale Iphones 3g Hiphones Hiphones Wholesale Hiphone Wholesale Hiphone Wholesale Hiphones Wholesale Hiphones Wholesale Nokia Wholesale Nokia Wholesale Nokia 8800 Wholesale Nokia 8800 Wholesale Nokia n97 Wholesale Nokia n97 wholesale blackberry wholesale blackberry wholesale blackberry phones wholesale blackberry phones wholesale blackberry 9700 wholesale blackberry 9700 wholesale blackberry 9600 wholesale blackberry 9600 wholesale blackberry 9500 wholesale blackberry 9500 China Wholesale
Posted by: China Wholesale | January 21, 2010 10:30 PM
ed hardy clothing
Posted by: ed hardy | January 27, 2010 12:51 AM