RSS Feeds Feeds: Articles | Issues
Articles About TAP Subscribe Donate
TAPPED  |  Beat the Press

Remember Me
Forgot your password?

The symbol identifies content for paid subscribers only.


 



The group blog of The American Prospect

THE MORALITY OF REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH AND CHOICE.

Following up on Dana's and Scott's posts debunking the increasingly circulated myth that American public opinion is trending away from favoring legal abortion, my inbox is full of press releases and other assorted trumpeting of said myth. Sample: "New Gallup Poll: Obama on Collision Course with Public Opinion on Abortion Policy." (That's from the Susan B. Anthony List -- the anti-abortion movement's answer to Emily's List -- which supported and continues to support the political rise of Sarah Palin.)

In his efforts to to find "common ground" on reducing the need for abortion, Obama has failed to offer the values-laden rhetorical support for his pro-choice position, opting instead, at least for the moment, to conduct listening sessions on the issue through the White House Council on Women and Girls and the Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships (OFBNP). The religious "common ground" voices are well-positioned in the OFBNP and have grumbled, for example, about Obama's reversal of the global gag rule. That reversal was a victory for global reproductive health, because it lifted U.S. funding restrictions on clinics abroad that offered both contraceptives and abortion services. In other words, to "punish" them for offering safe abortion, the global gag rule also squeezed funding for the very services that would prevent unintended pregnancies in the first place. Without safe abortion services, as our own Michelle Goldberg showed in her book, The Means of Reproduction, women around the globe are forced into tragic and often fatal choices.

When Obama reversed the rule in January, he got a lot of kudos for not issuing the executive order on the anniversary of Roe v. Wade, when anti-choice activists descend on Washington for their March for Life. He signed the executive order quietly on a Friday afternoon and was praised for not sticking it to his political adversaries.

One of the data points from the recent polls is the low (35 percent, according to a Gallup poll taken at the end of January) public support for Obama's reversal of the global gag rule. But is this because Americans oppose abortion, or because Obama hasn't made the case for his action? Obama could have, but hasn't, made a forceful moral argument for birth control and safe, legal abortion as the basis for his repeal of the global gag rule. Instead, he seems uncomfortably cornered when asked about legal abortion, resorting to framing it as the moral question women face when deciding whether to continue with an unintended pregnancy. He has not framed the question as our moral obligation to provide safe and effective medical services to women, and has not argued that our failure to do so is immoral.

--Sarah Posner



COMMENTS

I don't support abortion because of 'safe medical choices', I support Abortion because people shouldn't be forced to be parents. That serves the interests of no one.

I just think males should be allowed to opt out of parentage too. If a male doesn't want the responsibilities of fatherhood, they should not be forced on to him either.

Yet liberals think it's a great idea to jail men for owing women money when they had no choice in the matter of parentage. And spare me the 'sex=children' argument. thats as moronic as me telling you not to spread your legs.

soullite, I don't know if I understand you correctly. Do you mean that when women get pregnant, the men who fathered the child should only have to pay if they want? And if they don't want to, they could simply say, "Hey, if you don't want to be responsible for the child all by yourself, just get an abortion and the problem is solved"?
I'd be grateful for a clarification, otherwise it looks as if you want to saddle the woman with all the responsibility while the men can have their pleasure and then whistle off any consequences.
And if I assume correctly and you're a conservative, how do you reconcile that with the conservative's usual view on strong family values and a child needing to have a father and a mother?

soullite, by "I don't support abortion because of 'safe medical choices'" do you mean that you don't care about women's health/lives, or that you don't believe that an abortion can be a "safe medical choice"?

I don't support abortion but yes it's a personal choice. Well, I am just here to support those fathers or would be fathers who lost their jobs due to recession.We do offer part or full time jobs according to your interests.Also know the tips to enhance your chances to be picked. So find your job at the link...


Ricky Marti

Fellow faithful Catholics, please don't forget to protest in any legal way you can Baby-Killer Obama's shameful appearance at Notre Dame tomorrow. We must stop this crime from happening or at least make our voices heard amid all the clamouring for the blood of the unborn. The man must never be allowed on a Catholic campus or in a Catholic church again, until he changes his views and his actions on baby killing.

If the "right" of a fetus conflicts with the right of autonomy of a pregnant woman, the fetus loses. Yes, I am in favor of baby killing.

Post a comment


Search TAPPED for:

Archives

About TAPPED

TAPPED, the Prospect's award-winning group blog, is a link-intensive collection of musings, ramblings, opinions and other assorted writing on the political developments of the day. See a list of our contributors.

| RSS | Twitter


Renew your print subscription or e-subscription.
Get an e-subscription for $14.95.
Give the gift of political insight. Send The American Prospect to a friend.
Change your email address or street address.
YES! I want to receive The American Prospect
— the essential source for progressive ideas.
Explore The American Prospect's award-winning investigative journalism and provocative essays in a free trial issue. Continue receiving The American Prospect at only $19.95 for a one-year subscription - a savings of 60% off the newsstand price!
First Name
Last Name
Address 1
Address 2
City
State
ZIP     
Email

Should you decide not to continue receiving the magazine after the initial free issue, simply write "cancel" on the invoice and you will not be billed.

© 2009 by The American Prospect, Inc.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Permissions and Reprints