ROMNEY'S SPEAKERS SPEAK. I called up Romney's press office to get clarification on the governor's remarks. I have never before gotten to watch such pure, undistilled, spin. It was something of a joy to behold. When Romney said "if Saddam Hussein had opened his country to IAEA inspectors and they'd gone in and found that there were no weapons," he didn't mean that the inspectors didn't go in and find that there was no evidence of a revived nuclear weapons program; he was instead offering a near-metaphysical commentary on Saddam's intentionality throughout the whole process. Because Saddam did not welcome them with joy in his heart and transparency on his lips, they weren't actually there. We then got into an argument over whether we should trust Dick Cheney's judgment on the access offered to the IAEA inspectors or the IAEA inspectors' judgment on their own access. All in all, a fruitful exchange. And just for the record, here's what Mohammed el-Baradei reported on March 7, 2003:
One, there is no indication of resumed nuclear activities in those buildings that were identified through the use of satellite imagery as being reconstructed or newly erected since 1998, nor any indication of nuclear-related prohibited activities at any inspected sites.Second, there is no indication that Iraq has attempted to import uranium since 1990.
Three, there is no indication that Iraq has attempted to import aluminum tubes for use in centrifuge enrichment. Moreover, even had Iraq pursued such a plan, it would have encountered practical difficulties in manufacturing centrifuge out of the aluminum tubes in question.
Fourth, although we are still reviewing issues related to magnets and magnet-production, there is no indication to date that Iraq imported magnets for use in centrifuge enrichment program.
As I stated above, the IAEA will naturally continue further to scrutinize and investigate all of the above issues.
After three months of intrusive inspections, we have to date found no evidence or plausible indication of the revival of a nuclear weapon program in Iraq.[...]
I should note that in the past three weeks, possibly as a result of ever-increasing pressure by the international community, Iraq has been forthcoming in its cooperation, particularly with regard to the conduct of private interviews and in making available evidence that could contribute to the resolution of matters of IAEA concern.
--Ezra Klein
Feeds: 



COMMENTS (9)
Paul Krugman has a column about Mitt Romney's lie.
http://wealthyfrenchman.blogspot.com/
If Romney had lied about whether he smoked pot in 8th grade the press would have treated it as a "character issue". But for some reason the press treats lies about major policy issues as no big deal.
Posted by: Nan | June 8, 2007 12:49 PM
But Romney's philosophy on inspections is brilliant! You no longer need to actually go inspect a suspected country. All you have to do is devine their willingness to accept inspectors. Failure to greet the mere idea of intrusive inspections with candy and flowers is justification for invasion and overthrow. This will make convincing the country to back more misguided wars sooooo much easier.
Posted by: Col Bat Guano | June 8, 2007 1:53 PM
Right, and a Google News search turns up 9 hits for this comment, this site included. This versus 114 news stories on the Huckabee-Reagan gaffe. Which one is truly more important, and which one actually reflects on their ability to be president?
Posted by: Matt Timberlake | June 8, 2007 1:55 PM
Oh, don't just tease us by telling us it was gorgeous spin. The fuller the transcript, the more our delight in seeing the doublespeak in all its glory.
Posted by: SDM | June 8, 2007 2:11 PM
Oh, I dunno. I've heard and read enough from the doubleplusgood duckspeakers to last a lifetime.
Posted by: Dean Keeton | June 8, 2007 3:29 PM
At this point, wouldn't it just be easier to say that he was wrong and move on, even if it made his commentary about the war senseless?
Posted by: Brian | June 8, 2007 5:37 PM
You could have done this more cleanly. They want to talk about anything other than the question of whether inspectors were present within the boundaries of the geographic area known as Iraq, and whether Saddam issued any order to them requiring them to move outside those boundaries.
Why let them talk about the extent of access, who we should believe about the extent of access, or the credibility of the vice president? Romney's statement was a falsifiable statement of fact, not opinion, and it was in fact falsified.
The more important story -- and the one of more use to us, since a Romney nomination would be a gift from that wonderful almighty they kept talking about -- is that no one on the fucking stage corrected him. Unacceptable.
Posted by: RW | June 9, 2007 12:50 AM
otswihlpa ldgejmqvc jpin rebpgmah cnklbvhz zvkebwm jsbgywioe
Posted by: ifvur syzdk | July 4, 2007 9:18 AM
jginb tfusy wvolxd lbed gcbzkrh orxtbl lbafjmrsh http://www.sajbei.qcdusyl.com
Posted by: koyjqvlfc qhtcnlzmo | July 4, 2007 9:19 AM