NEW FRONT IN ABORTION WARS: THE KANSAS GOVERNOR'S MANSION.
Sam Brownback with a young supporter at the 2007 CPAC conference in D.C. Photo via Flickr user VictoryNH.
On the heels of Dr. George Tiller's May 31 murder outside his Wichita church, the state of Kansas has, once again, become the nation's foremost battleground over reproductive rights. In recent years Kansas tilted left, in large part due to the leadership of former Gov. Kathleen Sebelius, a pro-choice moderate. But now, retiring Sen. Sam Brownback -- a conservative Catholic and national spokesman for the anti-abortion rights movement -- has a clear path to the GOP gubernatorial nomination, and is considered the favorite over any potential Democratic nominee.
If elected, Brownback will have an enthusiastic, Republican state legislature to work with on rolling back reproductive rights. It's worth remembering that Sebelius' HHS secretary nomination was almost derailed by that body, which forced her to deal with a series of divisive abortion-related bills during her Senate confirmation hearings. Brownback would certainly unleash those forces, moving forward on legislation that would require doctors performing late-term abortions to submit, in writing, exactly what medical risks "justify" the procedure. In April, in one of her last acts as governor, Sebelius vetoed that bill, which also would have allowed the husbands and parents of patients to sue abortion providers if they suspected the pregnant woman's health wasn't really at risk. The bill was intended to intimidate Dr. Tiller and his brethren out of business, and would stymie the work of Dr. Leroy Carhart, the physician who has promised to begin offering late-term abortions in Kansas in Tiller's stead.
Just to reiterate how radical Sam Brownback is on abortion: He regularly compares abortion to slavery and Jim Crow, and believes the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause applies to fetuses. He opposes abortion rights even in cases of rape and incest, or when the pregnant woman's health is at risk. While campaigning in the GOP presidential primary in 2007, Brownback chose abortion as "the most pressing moral issue in the U.S. today." He also said the repeal of Roe v. Wade would be "a glorious day of human liberty and freedom."
--Dana Goldstein
Feeds: 



COMMENTS (11)
If you're worried the democratic process in Kansas might produce a result you don't like, I'd strongly suggest you stop bitching about it and spend your time and energy promoting federal legislation protecting whatever abortion rights you want.
Mike
Posted by: MBunge | June 16, 2009 12:44 PM
Senator Brownback is a shameless busybody, and is surely no friend of the fundamental rights of privacy and personal autonomy, but rolling back reproductive rights? Really?
Paging Mr. Orwell; paging Mr. Orwell.
Since the Shakers died out, has anyone seriously advocated curtailing the right to reproduce? Can anyone provide a quote or a link there?
Roe v. Wade is an abortion rights case. For a reproductive rights case, we have to hark back as far as the World War II erea case of Skinner v. State of Oklahoma ex rel. Williamson, 316 U.S. 535 (1942), which invalidated a state criminal sentencing scheme known as the Oklahoma Habitual Criminal Sterilization Act, which mandated vasectomies in some cases.
To my knowledge, no court has upheld a statute curtailing the right to reproduce since Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927), which enabled Virginia's Superintendent of the State Colony for Epileptics and Feeble Minded to order forced sterilization of a third generation feeble minded woman.
For those of us on the side of freedom/personal autonomy regarding abortion rights, let's say what we mean and leave the euphemisms and stilted language to the fetus fetishists.
Posted by: John in Nashville | June 16, 2009 7:31 PM
At least Brownback is a real Catholic who will stand up for real Catholic values, which are in essence human values, in the face of the baby killing industry and its bloodthristy supporters and that means you, Dana-accessory-to-baby-murder. Sebelius by contrast was and is worthless as Catholic, just about as Catholic as bin Laden or Tojo or Stalin.
Posted by: Anonymous | June 16, 2009 8:09 PM
You are incorrect that, under the bill Sebelius vetoed, an abortionist could be sued by someone with a half-baked suspicion or malevolent intent. You may have been lead to this mistake by Sebelius' self-serving veto claim that the bill would unfairly intimidate good faith abortionists.
The current Kansas late-term law allows the practitioner plenty of "medical elbow room" to assess health and perform abortions past 21 weeks 1)if the fetus cannot live outside the mother with or without medical assistance, or 2) if the fetus CAN live, but the mother would suffer death or irreversible and substantial physical or mental harm. The late-term law also requires an independent medical referral and proper reporting to the health department (without personal information that identifies the aborted female).
The proposed vetoed bill [http://www.kslegislature.org/bills/2010/218.pdf] included a provision [pg7, section 4 G]granting standing to sue to parents of a minor, or the spouse who is also the fetus' father, after discovering a post-21 week abortion did not follow the late-term requirements.
The bill's provision for suing compares to the civil suit against OJ. It would have given standing to bring forth a suit to limited parties with an interest in the aborted woman--but certainly not for frivolous opinions about health.
Posted by: kathy ostrowski | June 17, 2009 1:54 AM
When did the TAPPED comments get taken over by ultra-conservatives and pedants? In order, and patiently:
MBunge, writing is Dana's job, see, and the way she tries to affect policy. Probably she, unlike you, can imagine trying to protect abortion rights at the state and federal levels SIMULTANEOUSLY.
John in Nashville, I'm a real grammar and usage snob, and even I can tell that reproductive rights encompass both the right to reproduce and the right NOT to reproduce. That second one is what's at issue in abortion rights cases, if you hadn't noticed.
Anonymous: seriously?
kathy ostrowski: your usage gives you away. Abortionists? Aborted woman? Sigh.
Posted by: North | June 17, 2009 11:37 AM
Democrats in Kansas have an uphill battle, and Brownback's only "moderate" opponent dropped out of the race this week, so he's basically guaranteed the Governor's mansion. It's too bad, because there are plenty of good moderate republicans in Kansas, but the religious right-wingers have driven them from the party. Some have joined the Democratic party, but most just drop out of politics. There are literally dozens of more important issues facing our state, but these zealots can only focus on a medical procedure that has absolutely nothing to do with them.
Posted by: KansasVoter | June 17, 2009 11:42 AM
Let's work to get the Democratic candidate elected. When given the choice between a rightwing Republican, like Brownback, and a talented, moderate Democrat, like Sebelius, Kansans often choose the Democrat. We just need the right candidate, a great campaign and lots of hard work.
Posted by: skylights | June 17, 2009 5:13 PM
I think it would be good if a whole-life candidate were elected. But, I was under the impression that Sen. Brownback supported Ms. Sebelius as HHS Secretary during her confirmation. A lot of people felt betrayed by that and this article doesn't seem to mention that particular mitigating factor, it just paints him as a Catholic champion of life, which is who I'd like to see in office. I just hope he'll be that guy.
Posted by: Peter Turner | June 18, 2009 6:58 AM
Keep religion far, far away from political rule. Religious fetishists are an unstable, myopic lot.
I realize the American Taliban is salivating at the idea of enslaving women and girls once and for all with forced pregnancy and childbirth, but anyone who seriously believes blastocysts and fetuses have more rights than their host bodies is deranged, to put it mildly. And they promise to act against the public interest.
It's a sick strategy to use blastocysts to demonize women, but that's religion for ya. Full of men who hate women's autonomy and brainwash women into believing they are not full human beings equal to men or children. That's all this is and it's pretty transparent.
Posted by: Lee | June 19, 2009 1:36 PM
To compare abortion with slavery is indeed mistaken in a fundamental aspect. While it is true that the same language rejecting the rights of personhood appears pervasively in both, just a few slaves were killed, and they could resist violence. Badies are abjectly helpless, and every abortion kills one. No, Aboriton is far the greatest evil ever visited upon mankind.
Posted by: hportiers | June 19, 2009 4:04 PM
Here's a new abortion blog, unlike any you've ever read before, guaranteed!
AICH TEE TEE PEA://operationcounterstrike.blogspot.com
Posted by: OperationCounterstrike | June 19, 2009 4:57 PM