OBAMA ON WOMEN'S RIGHTS IN CAIRO.
At UN Dispatch, Peter Daou has some harsh words about the women's rights segment of Obama's Cairo speech. Indeed, the issue of Muslim women's right to wear the hijab in Western Europe was clearly chosen because of its political expedience -- an opportunity to side with the Muslim world over our traditional Western allies -- not because it is the major issue facing women in the Middle East. I support women's choice to wear the hijab. But for many women in countries such as Iran and Saudi Arabia, veiling is a major daily imposition and human rights violation -- one they vociferously oppose.
Here's what the president said:
The U.S. government has gone to court to protect the right of women and girls to wear the hijab, and to punish those who would deny it.I reject the view of some in the West that a woman who chooses to cover her hair is somehow less equal, but I do believe that a woman who is denied an education is denied equality. And it is no coincidence that countries where women are well-educated are far more likely to be prosperous.
Now let me be clear: issues of women's equality are by no means simply an issue for Islam. In Turkey, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Indonesia, we have seen Muslim-majority countries elect a woman to lead. Meanwhile, the struggle for women's equality continues in many aspects of American life, and in countries around the world.
Our daughters can contribute just as much to society as our sons, and our common prosperity will be advanced by allowing all humanity - men and women - to reach their full potential. I do not believe that women must make the same choices as men in order to be equal, and I respect those women who choose to live their lives in traditional roles. But it should be their choice. That is why the United States will partner with any Muslim-majority country to support expanded literacy for girls, and to help young women pursue employment through micro-financing that helps people live their dreams.
I like the emphasis on education. Late last year, Saudi Arabia's King Abdullah announced plans to open the nation's first women's university, which will allow Saudi women to comprehensively study medicine, pharmacy, management, computer science, and foreign languages for the first time. Yet in Saudi Arabia, education remains completely sex-segregated. Female college students interact with their male instructors only through a video feed.
But I have to agree with Daou that Obama missed an opportunity to more strongly stand up for Muslim women's rights around issues like genital mutilation and rape. He writes, "With women being stoned, raped, abused, battered, mutilated, and slaughtered on a daily basis across the globe, violence that is so often perpetrated in the name of religion, the most our president can speak about is protecting their right to wear the hijab?"
--Dana Goldstein
Feeds: 



COMMENTS (7)
I agree with both Daou and Goldstein on this. The crucial issue is that those who commit the violence and oppression can no longer be allowed to abuse religion as a pretense for their actions, any more than those who torture can abuse fear as a pretense. Obama needs to be bolder and confront the issue more directly.
The challenge of the civil rights movement in the United States was to finally redeem the promise of the Constitution. The challenge globally today is to finally redeem the promise of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Posted by: Michael A. Shea | June 4, 2009 11:13 AM
Peter Daou criticizing Obama? Say it ain't so!
Really, folks. It was a single speech. Get a grip.
Posted by: nepat | June 4, 2009 12:39 PM
I agree with nepat on this one. However, it is also fair to say that Obama's typical use of "on the one hand/on the other hand" ought to have led him to say proudly that in America, at least, Muslim women *have the choice* to veil, or not to veil and that it is that choice, not the veil itself, that we defend and demand. He tried to balance the issue very weakly with a call to "educate the girls" perhaps hoping that in one or two generations the educated girls will be able to successfully advocate for themselves within their own religions. Weak tea for the women who are being held down now.
aimai
Posted by: aimai | June 4, 2009 1:02 PM
someone keeps following all the posts that reference daou's article and writing the same thing. "im not surprised that daou is criticizing obama" - yes because this is personal.
fail.
Posted by: julian | June 4, 2009 2:45 PM
All this feminist "discourse" is just the usual neo-imperialist ethnocentric phallo-logo-eurocentric absolutist crappola. Other peoples have other values and don't want you or any other imperialists imposing your supposedly superior values on them. This is all the kind of stuff you should have covered in the first week of your Anthropology 101 course. You and your values are not the center of the world, not even a very shiny corner of it, so GET OVER IT ALREADY.
Posted by: Anti Imperialist Cosmopolitan | June 4, 2009 8:50 PM
"All this feminist "discourse" is just the usual neo-imperialist ethnocentric phallo-logo-eurocentric absolutist crappola." And I suppose the right to beat women, the demand that they cover every inch of their skin in loose dark cloth and the insistence they not travel outside the home without a male relative are perfectly acceptable in your book? They aren't in mine. I have no hesitance to say that these three "values" are inferior to mine. Don't like it. Tough. Also, you're cynically using the past colonialism to justify serious acts of oppression against millions of human beings. Take your whining and shove it.
Posted by: Slamguy | June 5, 2009 12:34 AM
Obama's comments on women's rights were shallow and condescending. And they came towards the end of the speech. YUCK! Barack Obama isn't even close to being pro-feminist and Michelle Robinson (aka Obama) has sold out to patriarchy.
Posted by: Kathleen Trigiani | June 8, 2009 9:06 PM