RSS Feeds Feeds: Articles | Issues
Articles About TAP Subscribe Donate
TAPPED  |  Beat the Press

Remember Me
Forgot your password?

The symbol identifies content for paid subscribers only.


 



The group blog of The American Prospect

WAXMAN BEATS BIG TOBACCO.

waxman.jpg
"Mustache of Justice."

This afternoon, President Barack Obama will sign the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act of 2009, which among many good things noted after the jump, will allow the Food and Drug Administration to regulate cigarettes. It's a particularly important day for the bill's chief sponsor, Representative Henry Waxman, who chairs the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which, however logically, has jurisdiction over health issues. This weekend I read Waxman's forthcoming legislative memoir (a burgeoning and exciting genre), written with the assistance of Atlantic reporter Joshua Green, The Waxman Report: How Congress Really Works. It's a very useful primer on Congress and the long battles Waxman has led on behalf of a variety of key progressive causes. You also learn, strangely enough, that Waxman was one of the first Members of Congress to undertake the now common practice of donating to his colleagues' campaign funds in an effort to keep around representatives he saw as effective and curry favor. For all Waxman's idealism, you can't say he isn't savvy.

Waxman began his attempts to regulate tobacco in the early 1980s, with oversight hearings featuring Captain Kangaroo, and continued his work through then-Representative Dick Durbin's controversial 1987 amendment to ban smoking on airplane flights shorter than two hours, Waxman's own groundbreaking 1994 hearings where tobacco executives lied under oath, Newt Gingrich's torpedoing of a 1998 tobacco regulation compromise, and finally President Bush's threat to veto this bill last July that left it hanging...until today.

It says something about Waxman's tenacity and how political change comes about in the face of entrenched interests that it has taken nearly thirty years to achieve federal regulation of something most people will concede is a drug. Harold Meyerson has written eloquently about Waxman's work in the past, and you really have to concede that in terms of sheer legislation, if with Waxman's help we see successful health care reform and/or a Cap-and-Trade bill, he could very well be the the single greatest liberal legislator of the last half century -- especially when you consider the Clean Air Act, the earliest HIV/AIDs legislation, Tobacco regulation, nutrition labeling, not even to mention protecting medicare throughout the Reagan and Bush years and his exemplary oversight work when the Democrats took back the congressional majority in 2006. Who else would you nominate?

-- Tim Fernholz

The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act of 2009

* New Center for Tobacco Products: FDA will create a new Center for Tobacco Products to oversee the science-based regulation of tobacco products in the United States.

* Banning Candy-Flavored Cigarettes: By October 2009, cigarettes will be prohibited from having candy, fruit, and spice flavors as their characterizing flavors.

* Full Disclosure of Ingredients and Additives: By January 2010, tobacco manufacturers and importers will submit information to FDA in their possession about ingredients and additives in tobacco products, a description of the nicotine content and delivery, and the health consequences of tobacco products.

* Stopping Youth-Focused Marketing: By April 2010, FDA will issue the agency's 1996 regulation aimed at reducing young people's access to tobacco products and curbing the appeal of tobacco to the young. When the regulation becomes effective, a number of measures will take effect, including:

o Tobacco manufacturers may no longer sponsor sporting, athletic, and entertainment events using tobacco product brand names and logos;

o Tobacco manufacturers may no longer sell or give away clothing or other items which bear the brand name or logo of a tobacco product; and

o Tobacco manufacturers will no longer be able to distribute free samples of cigarettes, and free samples of smokeless tobacco will be allowed only in adult-only facilities.

* Prohibiting Other Marketing Measures Misleading Consumers: By July 2010, tobacco manufacturers may no longer use the terms "light," "low," and "mild" on tobacco products.

ยท * New Warning Labels: By July 2011, warning labels for cigarettes and smokeless tobacco products will be revised and strengthened. Warnings will comprise the top 50 percent of the front and rear panels of the package. FDA will issue regulations requiring graphics on labels depicting the health risks of smoking.

The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act of 2009 also provides FDA with regulatory authority to regulate marketing and promotion of tobacco products and set performance standards for tobacco products to protect the public health.



COMMENTS

This is no victory for America. It is a triumph for Philip Morris, the largest cigarette company in America, who helped write it and pushed it through Congress.

The American Association of Public Health Physicians says this bill "gives the image, but not the substance of effective federal regulatory authority" and "will do more harm than good".

For just one example, the bill says all FDA regulations must go through a committee that includes three tobacco industry representatives.

The same day this bill was signed, Philip Morris launched an entire new brand of cigarette "Marlboro Menthol". The bill explicitly bans FDA from regulating menthol in cigarettes. You do the math.

No, this is no victory for America.

Though some are concerned with smokers' rights, tobacco use is a public health concern, and smoking is the leading environmental cause (all cancers can be caused due to genetics) of lung cancer. The Obama anti-smoking bill, or the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act puts cigarettes and other tobacco products squarely into the hands of the FDA, and even if tobacco companies are looking for a little more cash now, they are prohibited from marketing to teenagers with the bill, or engaging in any other misleading marketing. Though some are concerned with smokers' rights, tobacco use is a public health concern, and smoking is the leading environmental cause (all cancers can be caused due to genetics) of lung cancer.

I think this may be good move but we need to see what is the intention in it. This actually has two contrdictory factors-
1. Govt. earn money from the cigarette and smokers
2. Govt. wants to curb the cigarette use.
I don't know how bth of the intentions can be inside one policy.

http://www.gocubans.com

Post a comment


Search TAPPED for:

Archives

About TAPPED

TAPPED, the Prospect's award-winning group blog, is a link-intensive collection of musings, ramblings, opinions and other assorted writing on the political developments of the day. See a list of our contributors.

| RSS | Twitter


Renew your print subscription or e-subscription.
Get an e-subscription for $14.95.
Give the gift of political insight. Send The American Prospect to a friend.
Change your email address or street address.
YES! I want to receive The American Prospect
— the essential source for progressive ideas.
Explore The American Prospect's award-winning investigative journalism and provocative essays in a free trial issue. Continue receiving The American Prospect at only $19.95 for a one-year subscription - a savings of 60% off the newsstand price!
First Name
Last Name
Address 1
Address 2
City
State
ZIP     
Email

Should you decide not to continue receiving the magazine after the initial free issue, simply write "cancel" on the invoice and you will not be billed.

© 2010 by The American Prospect, Inc.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Permissions and Reprints