RSS Feeds Feeds: Articles | Issues
Articles About TAP Subscribe Donate
TAPPED  |  Beat the Press

Remember Me
Forgot your password?

The symbol identifies content for paid subscribers only.


 



The group blog of The American Prospect

WHEN JOURNALISTS KEEP QUIET.

After being held by the Taliban for seven months, David Rohde, a New York Times reporter, is free. I never met Rohde, but I felt a tremendous sense of release when I heard the news. Several weeks ago, I asked a colleague of mine – another journalist – about him, and my friend’s answer was succinct: “He’s screwed.” Luckily, that turned out to be untrue. An Afghan journalist named Tahir Ludin, who had been seized along with Rohde, recounted their harrowing escape in Sunday’s New York Times. One reader commented, "What I consider really amazing is that the entire press, I suppose that included international press, were able to keep this confidential for so long."

For months, I had heard about Rohde’s kidnapping and was surprised that nobody wrote any stories about it. The reason for the silence was simple: His family did not want the media to report on it, and so nobody did. But it was never clear – to me, at least – whether a news blackout was the best strategy in securing his release. Yet there was no opportunity to discuss this question openly. It’s an important topic because the kidnapping of journalists has become oddly normal these days and has an impact on how journalists work in Afghanistan and Pakistan and, of course, how the news is reported. At a dinner party in New York several months ago, I sat at a table with two other journalists who had been kidnapped by the Taliban. Both had gotten away unharmed.

It seemed natural to protect the secret of the Rohde family, particularly when the stakes were so high. But it also seemed strange to talk with a bunch of international journalists for months about the different strategies that the families of kidnapping victims might use -- visiting the country where the individual has been kidnapped, offering money for ransom, hiring kidnapping experts -- and yet none of this debate appeared in newspapers or on blogs. The past few months have been an ordeal for everyone who knew Rohde, and even for those who did not know him personally. Thank God the story has turned out well. I hope now that people will have a chance to talk about kidnapping theories in a more open fashion and be prepared for the time when the next kidnapping occurs.

–Tara McKelvey

Post a comment


Search TAPPED for:

Archives

About TAPPED

TAPPED, the Prospect's award-winning group blog, is a link-intensive collection of musings, ramblings, opinions and other assorted writing on the political developments of the day. See a list of our contributors.

| RSS | Twitter


Renew your print subscription or e-subscription.
Get an e-subscription for $14.95.
Give the gift of political insight. Send The American Prospect to a friend.
Change your email address or street address.
YES! I want to receive The American Prospect
— the essential source for progressive ideas.
Explore The American Prospect's award-winning investigative journalism and provocative essays in a free trial issue. Continue receiving The American Prospect at only $19.95 for a one-year subscription - a savings of 60% off the newsstand price!
First Name
Last Name
Address 1
Address 2
City
State
ZIP     
Email

Should you decide not to continue receiving the magazine after the initial free issue, simply write "cancel" on the invoice and you will not be billed.

© 2010 by The American Prospect, Inc.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Permissions and Reprints