RSS Feeds Feeds: Articles | Issues
Articles About TAP Subscribe Donate
TAPPED  |  Beat the Press

Remember Me
Forgot your password?

The symbol identifies content for paid subscribers only.


 



The group blog of The American Prospect

THE CUBA QUESTION. One final debate note. A political practioner friend who's no Hillary Clinton shill pointed out something very interesting in Barack Obama's debate answer on meeting with anathema regimes .

Hillary nailed him...for a...reason, subsumed within the larger distinction between their answers: The Cuba issue. It would be bracing if a Democratic candidate coherently and bravely made the case to change our irrational policy toward Cuba. But that's not what Obama was doing -- he just checked off a list of authoritarian leaders and said, "Sure, I'd be willing to talk to these guys." He barely noticed that one's opinion about one of these "guys" can decide a presidential election. If a Dem candidate could shave the GOP Cuban American edge from 80-20 to 60-40, they wouldn't have to worry about Ohio because they'd win Florida.

So the political trouble with Obama's answer is that every Cuban is South Florida heard it (still 9% of the electorate in Florida). Note that Hillary specifically named Castro among the people she would NOT be willing to talk to unless a lot of things changed -- that was soley directed toward Little Havana and nowhere else. The move of an experienced, cynical pol -- Obama looked like a naif.

I still think Obama connected best during last night's debate, but sometimes the ability to connect emotionally only gets you so far.

UPDATE: Howard Kurtz has more on the local media reaction in Florida, where The Miami Herald ran with the headline "Obama, Edwards say they would meet with Castro, Chávez" for the story on their debate remarks on "two leaders who top South Florida's most-hated list."

--Garance Franke-Ruta



COMMENTS

This analysis ignores that there are now lots of Cubans in Miami who DO want us to talk to Castro. It might have been true 20 years ago, it isn't now.

And, of course, the substance of Obama's position is right-- we SHOULD talk to the Cuban leadership. This is just one more example of the fact that Hillary Clinton will always prefer whatever solution makes her look less hawkish.

Excuse me, I meant MORE hawkish.

Remember how James Baker felt about the Jews?

That's how I feel about the spoiled "exile" crowd in Miami.

Fuck 'em. They don't vote for us anyway.

Did it occur to anyone that sometimes "disastrous" policies are perpetuated forever because of some bit of political conventional wisdom. Granted, a lot of politics involves catering to people who are objectively wrong, but calling that the "smart" thing to do seems awfully cynical, and well, wrong, too.

Post a comment


Search TAPPED for:

Archives

About TAPPED

TAPPED, the Prospect's award-winning group blog, is a link-intensive collection of musings, ramblings, opinions and other assorted writing on the political developments of the day. See a list of our contributors.

| RSS | Twitter


Renew your print subscription or e-subscription.
Get an e-subscription for $14.95.
Give the gift of political insight. Send The American Prospect to a friend.
Change your email address or street address.
YES! I want to receive The American Prospect
— the essential source for progressive ideas.
Explore The American Prospect's award-winning investigative journalism and provocative essays in a free trial issue. Continue receiving The American Prospect at only $19.95 for a one-year subscription - a savings of 60% off the newsstand price!
First Name
Last Name
Address 1
Address 2
City
State
ZIP     
Email

Should you decide not to continue receiving the magazine after the initial free issue, simply write "cancel" on the invoice and you will not be billed.

© 2009 by The American Prospect, Inc.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Permissions and Reprints