A LESSON IN CONSERVATIVE PARENTING.
Conservative syndicated columnist Mona Charen takes her 14-year old son to the supermarket. He asks her, "What's up with Cosmopolitan? What is that?" She replies of the mass-market monthly (circulation 2,903,000), "It's a magazine for sluts."
Of course, I'm not going to mount a defense of Cosmo, which is vapid. But seriously. What more approval does a boy need to call women "sluts" for the rest of his life than his mom signaling to him that it's okay? Mona's son: If you're reading this, you should know that "slut" is a slur for which there is no companion term to refer to men. Calling women "sluts" will not endear you to the intelligent, self-confident ladies you may want to date someday. (If you're into ladies. And if you're not, that's okay too! No matter what your mother might say.)
--Dana Goldstein
Feeds: 


COMMENTS (16)
Maybe Charen's a sex positive feminist, and meant it as approbation. Reclaiming the word, etc. (I really do love the word as a verb, and, if it's not being reclaimed, it should be.)
Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | July 16, 2008 3:18 PM
"Calling women 'sluts' will not endear you to the intelligent, self-confident ladies you may want to date someday."
True enough, but where in the conservative movement do you see a great deal of men desiring "intelligent, self-confident ladies?" I sometimes worry that the sons of right-wingers are doomed to hook up with either total doormats or complete whack jobs, at which point they spend a great deal of their time trying to convince those of us with mutually respectful and satisfying relationships that we are Destroying the Family.
Posted by: Anonymous | July 16, 2008 3:25 PM
Oops-- forgot to add my screen name. The above comment was mine.
Posted by: Yossarian | July 16, 2008 3:26 PM
although slut is usually used for women, I've heard it plenty of times applied to guys too, though admittedly in a half-humorous, condemnatory but ironically jealous way by other guys.
Posted by: U.G. | July 16, 2008 3:38 PM
a teenager asks an open ended question (what's up with..?) and his mother gives him a declarative answer as if there is just one way to think about cosmo. that's what she's teaching her kid: there are no ambiguities, no gray areas; everything i say is right and those who disagree must be ridiculed. that's pretty much in line with the way mona c. has been writing for years.
Posted by: winer | July 16, 2008 3:53 PM
Ya' know, this post is hardly worthy of the prospect.
Posted by: El Viajero | July 16, 2008 4:11 PM
Keep in mind this is the same person who had no problem redbaiting a dead 13-year old girl.
Posted by: Anonymous | July 16, 2008 4:26 PM
I'm not sure that "slut" has no male companion term. The word "horndog" conveys the same meaning, although it may be slightly less pejorative.
Posted by: John Herbison | July 16, 2008 5:44 PM
C'mon now, the kid probably already has his head filled with the vilest and most demeaning views of women spewed out by gansta rappers.
Posted by: Anonymous | July 16, 2008 6:29 PM
What was said: "It's a magazine for sluts."
What the 14 year old boy heard: "Date girls who read Cosmo."
Posted by: Mark | July 16, 2008 7:00 PM
Let's keep in mind we're talking about a person who had no problem redbaiting a dead 13-year old girl.
Posted by: C.L. | July 16, 2008 9:33 PM
I can think of no greater incentive to young women to give Cosmo a second look than the fact that women like Mona Charen think it's "for sluts."
Posted by: Eric Scharf | July 17, 2008 9:14 AM
Cosmo is not for sluts! Just last week I figured out where my own G-spot was.
Boy was I wrong before.
Posted by: Mr. Boot | July 17, 2008 10:08 AM
AFAIK Mona Charen was right.
I say this because I once asked that very question of a female friend in college: if these magazines are aimed at straight women, why do they exclusively depict scantily clad babes on the cover - same cover art as men's magazines, basically. So who reads them?
Her reply: sluts!
She is now a law professor.
Posted by: The Navigator | July 17, 2008 10:13 AM
I had Mormon friend accidently bought a issue of cosmo. Does that accidentally makes her a slut?
Posted by: MeowKun | July 20, 2008 2:58 PM
CL I read that link, and I don't get it. It didn't say the little girl who wrote that utopian and idealistic letter was dead - what happened to her? The juxtaposition with the other little girl was quite moving, though. Whatever kind of woman Charon is, she had a point there.
Posted by: Siobhan | July 23, 2008 7:51 AM