Feeds: 
symbol identifies content for paid subscribers only.
COULD UNSEEN MEMOS FINALLY LEAD TO CONSEQUENCES FOR ADVOCATES OF TORTURE?
Jane Mayer discussed her new book The Dark Side: The Inside Story of How The War on Terror Turned into a War on American Ideals, with Steven Clemons today at The New America Foundation. The discussion touched on a number of topics in Mayer's book but the most engaging and disturbing part of the discussion was when Mayer was asked if anyone within the Bush White House are war criminals:
But perhaps that would change if some of the still "unsolved mysteries" Mayer mentioned were uncovered:"As a political reporter, I've covered the White House since the Reagan era, off and on, so I really see this much more as a political question than a legal question. ... You have to ask yourself 'do you see the appetite in this country for putting people on trial who could say that they were trying to protect America in a difficult time?' I think it's a real stretch to think that the public is the public is going to demand that these people go on trial."
But for these mysteries to have consequences for administration torture-backers the American public first must deal with the reality that, as Mayer says, torture has made us less safe. Sadly that's probably not going to happen."There are a number of legal memos nobody's seen, we've never seen the list of interrogation techniques that have been approved by this country. There are cases where people have disappeared, there are some where people seem to have been killed -- we really don't know everything yet and I would like to see at some point the books open and maybe hearings of some sort so that we can at least learn what the country's been doing and think about which part is worth it and which part is not."
Update: Also see Ryan Grim's just-posted review of Mayer's book on the site today.
--Daniel Strauss
COMMENTS (3)
There is another available remedy apartfrom criminal prosecution--albeit one that I think no one will have the stones to pursue. Paragraph 7 of Article I, ยง 3 of the Constitution states:
The expiration of the current president's term does not make impeachment moot; the House can still investigate and vote articles of impeachment, with the Senate to determine disqualification from holding federal office in the future.This is not a mere academic question. After serving as president, John Quincy Adams served in the House of Representatives and William Howard Taft served as Chief Justice of the United States. After serving as vice-president, Richard Nixon served as president and Hubert Humphrey served as a U. S. Senator. Walter Mondale served as Ambassador to Japan and was nominated to run for the Senate from Minnesota when Senator Paul Wellstone died in a plane crash.
Here's hoping that the next Congress will at least introduce articles of impeachment and investigate whether President Bush's and Vice-president Cheney's conduct with regard to the treatment of detainees warrants impeachment for failure to take care that the laws be faithfully executed.
Posted by: John in Nashville | July 15, 2008 6:15 PM
COULD UNSEEN MEMOS FINALLY LEAD TO CONSEQUENCES FOR ADVOCATES OF TORTURE?
No.
Posted by: mds | July 16, 2008 10:42 AM
Several members of this administration may not want to travel outside the country for quite a while.
Posted by: john m | July 16, 2008 1:38 PM