RSS Feeds Feeds: Articles | Issues
Articles About TAP Subscribe Donate
TAPPED  |  Beat the Press

Remember Me
Forgot your password?

The symbol identifies content for paid subscribers only.


 



The group blog of The American Prospect

VEEP NOTEBOOK.

Kathy G has an exhaustive roundup on potential running mates for Obama. I bascially agree with the rankings, if not all of the reasoning. A few points:

  • Of Kathy's top three (Sebelius, Edwards, and Brown), Sebelius is the only one with significant executive experience, and the only woman. Edwards's greater national experience cuts both ways; his performance on the previous ticket was underwhelming. With respect to Brown, I don't think that having a Democratic governor in Ohio ends the problem with appointing a red-state Senator. Whether we would get another re-electable, progressive Democratic Senator in Ohio is questionable. I'd rather have Brown in the Senate unless he was clearly better than the alternatives, and I don't think he is.
  • This point is important: "Evan Bayh is one of the biggest Democratic corporate 'hos in the senate -- he's "fiscally conservative," voted for the bankruptcy bill, is a DLC Dem all the way. He is literally one of the Wall Street Journal's favorite Democrats." Although it's tempting to describe divisions within the Democratic caucus as falling along cultural lines, more often red-state Democrats are alienated from the party because they are straightforward economic reactionaries. Tim Roemer whining about not being made DNC chair although he voted for Bush's tax cuts and against Clinton's budget package is a classic example.
  • Kathy's claim that Lieberman may have cost Gore the election is, I think, a pretty clear pundit's fallacy. I knew a lot of people who voted for Nader or flirted with the idea at the time, and I don't recall Lieberman being a major issue for anybody, and nor am I aware of any contemporaneous evidence for the proposition. Moreover, selecting Lieberman was the only time period of the campaign in which Gore received generally positive press coverage, which has to at least balance whatever trivial loss of voters he caused. On the other hand, Lieberman also suggests that picking running mates on the merits is important, as he certainly would have been a disaster in he job, especially if 9/11 had happened on the watch of a President Gore. 

--Scott Lemieux



COMMENTS

Sorry, Scott -- Edwards was hamstrung in 04 by Kerry, who was afraid of being shown up. JE is by far the best Veep choice. Picture him in Harrisburg, Cleveland, Grand Rapids, and throughout NC. No one else comes close.

And don't forget Elizabeth!

And disillusioned lefties / whackjobs like Nader would be back.

Post a comment


Search TAPPED for:

Archives

About TAPPED

TAPPED, the Prospect's award-winning group blog, is a link-intensive collection of musings, ramblings, opinions and other assorted writing on the political developments of the day. See a list of our contributors.

| RSS | Twitter


Renew your print subscription or e-subscription.
Get an e-subscription for $14.95.
Give the gift of political insight. Send The American Prospect to a friend.
Change your email address or street address.
YES! I want to receive The American Prospect
— the essential source for progressive ideas.
Explore The American Prospect's award-winning investigative journalism and provocative essays in a free trial issue. Continue receiving The American Prospect at only $19.95 for a one-year subscription - a savings of 60% off the newsstand price!
First Name
Last Name
Address 1
Address 2
City
State
ZIP     
Email

Should you decide not to continue receiving the magazine after the initial free issue, simply write "cancel" on the invoice and you will not be billed.

© 2009 by The American Prospect, Inc.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Permissions and Reprints