RSS Feeds Feeds: Articles | Issues
Articles About TAP Subscribe Donate
TAPPED  |  Beat the Press

Remember Me
Forgot your password?

The symbol identifies content for paid subscribers only.


 



The group blog of The American Prospect

OBAMA: NOT FUNDING ABORTIONS IS A "TRADITION."

Yesterday, in an interview with Katie Couric, President Obama finally directly addressed the question of abortion financing in the public plan. He reiterated that he doesn't want to "micromanage" on particular benefits. But in a statement that is sure to rile his pro-choice base, Obama referred to a "tradition" of banning federal funding for abortion. That is a reference to the Hyde Amendment, which currently prevents Medicaid coverage of abortions for poor women. And while none of the health reform bills in Congress threaten Hyde, reproductive health advocates have been trying for decades to repeal the ban. By deferring to this "tradition," Obama seems to be signaling that he could support a public plan that excludes abortion coverage.

Here are Obama's words to Couric:

Katie Couric: Do you favor a government option that would cover abortions?

President Obama: What I think is important, at this stage, is not trying to micromanage what benefits are covered. Because I think we're still trying to get a framework. And my main focus is making sure that people have the options of high quality care at the lowest possible price.

As you know, I'm pro choice. But I think we also have a tradition of, in this town, historically, of not financing abortions as part of government funded health care. Rather than wade into that issue at this point, I think that it's appropriate for us to figure out how to just deliver on the cost savings, and not get distracted by the abortion debate at this station.

Update: During campaign season, Obama said he opposed the Hyde Amendment. In a questionnaire on reproductive health issues, a member of Obama's staff wrote:

He believes that the federal government should not use its dollars to intrude on a poor woman's decision whether to carry to term or to terminate her pregnancy and selectively withhold benefits because she seeks to exercise her right of reproductive choice in a manner the government disfavors.

--Dana Goldstein



COMMENTS

Had he answered otherwise, he would have provided cover to a faction of Democrats who would just as soon pander to the healthcare industry, er, I mean balance the budget, and who would happily latch onto a promise to include payment for abortions as a ground for their "no" votes. It's ugly - law and sausages - but such is politics.

Impeach now, we've got another George Dubya Bush running thins.

5+ months of war crimes should be enough to hang him and that should encourage Joe Biden to lead change.

5000 dead in wars with no end.

Hey Hey Hey Obama how many boys did you kill today?

During campaign season...

And when asked about any campaign promises, Obama simply laughs the questions off as if to say "you didn't really believe me, did you?"

Nothing that POS Henry Hyde did is a 'tradition'. I guess impeaching Pres. Clinton would also be a tradition. Pres. Obama (IMO) is too deferential to the defeated, Repub side.

I have two problems with funding abortion:

1) Economic. Most abortions are paid for in cash. This keeps the price of abortions low. if abortions are funded primarily through third parties, the price of abortion will approach the price of giving birth pretty quickly. Given how common abortion is, it does not appear to me that there is a pressing need to subsidize it further. Any person, no matter how poor, who doesn't want to spend money raising a child will raise the money to abort her fetus in short order.

2) Health care cost control. Abortion, except in the case of a danger to the health of the mother, is a purely elective procedure. Taxpayers should only fund necessary procedures.

Here's a bonus reason: the vast majority opposes government funding of abortion. Most of us are pro-choice, but few of us believe that we should be subsidizing it.

Post a comment


Search TAPPED for:

Archives

About TAPPED

TAPPED, the Prospect's award-winning group blog, is a link-intensive collection of musings, ramblings, opinions and other assorted writing on the political developments of the day. See a list of our contributors.

| RSS | Twitter


Renew your print subscription or e-subscription.
Get an e-subscription for $14.95.
Give the gift of political insight. Send The American Prospect to a friend.
Change your email address or street address.
YES! I want to receive The American Prospect
— the essential source for progressive ideas.
Explore The American Prospect's award-winning investigative journalism and provocative essays in a free trial issue. Continue receiving The American Prospect at only $19.95 for a one-year subscription - a savings of 60% off the newsstand price!
First Name
Last Name
Address 1
Address 2
City
State
ZIP     
Email

Should you decide not to continue receiving the magazine after the initial free issue, simply write "cancel" on the invoice and you will not be billed.

© 2009 by The American Prospect, Inc.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Permissions and Reprints