RSS Feeds Feeds: Articles | Issues
Articles About TAP Subscribe Donate
TAPPED  |  Beat the Press

Remember Me
Forgot your password?

The symbol identifies content for paid subscribers only.


 



The group blog of The American Prospect

SOTOMAYOR WRAP UP, DAY 3: A WAR OF ATTRITION.

At this point, the dynamics of the battle over Sonia Sotomayor are clear: The GOP will continue to hammer Sotomayor on her previous statements on race, gender and judging, and Sotomayor will continue to assert her impartiality, patiently repeating the refrain, “As a judge, I don’t make policy," and that she decides her cases based on "fidelity to the law."

Sotomayor's repeated explanations of her comments have not dissuaded GOP senators from making the same demands, and there were certainly moments when it seemed as though Sotomayor was tired of having to repeat herself--or of having to reiterate basic civics to experienced legislators, such as the difference between circuit and district courts.

Not all of the Republican questioning consisted of badgering--Orrin Hatch in particular, did not interrupt Sotomayor and seemed to be giving her a change to explain herself rather than merely asking rhetorical questions. Arlen Specter was at his best--he neither asked softballs like his new, Democratic colleagues or badgered Sotomayor like his former, Republican ones. In a particularly gracious moment, he reflected on her controversial speeches and said, “A woman might want to assert her competency in a country where women were denied the right to vote for decades...I can see how someone would take pride in being a Latina woman and might want to assert herself.”

There's another aspect to this war of attrition: Sotomayor's long, technical explanations of her views--which, according to legal observers, mimic her opinions. Sotomayor answers each question speaking slowly, deliberately, and exhaustively--the mark of someone who has spent a lifetime confronting double-standards, a person who refuses to give her detractors an inch of rope to hang her with. This is light-years away from the conservative characterization of Sotomayor as someone who reached her station in life through "preferential treatment." People who are the regular recipients of preferential treatment are entitled, sometimes even arrogant. Sotomayor is so used to the hard way, the long slog, that she opts to take that road in each instance, even when she doesn't have to. She is wearing her questioners down, and while they have begun to show visible signs of frustration and impatience, Sotomayor doesn't seem like she's going to crack. If Republican Senators actually believed that Sotomayor was "unqualified," that she's an intellectual lightweight who could be easily outmaneuvered, they're beginning to be disabused of that notion.

-- A. Serwer



COMMENTS

The word that I think best describes Sotomayor as she replies to the questions on cases (both her own rulings and important Supreme Court cases) is "erudite." She has studied judicial history so carefully that she almost never has to say that she has not read a particular case record recently enough to comment. She doesn't just follow the law: she knows it. It is as if she is giving a short course -- to some willing and greatly impressed questioners and some unwilling and impatient ones who have their own agendas and are not there to learn.

Alren?

Yes, I loved it when, in response to an incoherent bizarre question on a legal brief filed by an organization for which she was a board member she began by saying, patiently:
"perhaps it would be helpful if I explained what a board member is" or "what a board does..."

loved it.

aimai

Post a comment


Search TAPPED for:

Archives

About TAPPED

TAPPED, the Prospect's award-winning group blog, is a link-intensive collection of musings, ramblings, opinions and other assorted writing on the political developments of the day. See a list of our contributors.

| RSS | Twitter


Renew your print subscription or e-subscription.
Get an e-subscription for $14.95.
Give the gift of political insight. Send The American Prospect to a friend.
Change your email address or street address.
YES! I want to receive The American Prospect
— the essential source for progressive ideas.
Explore The American Prospect's award-winning investigative journalism and provocative essays in a free trial issue. Continue receiving The American Prospect at only $19.95 for a one-year subscription - a savings of 60% off the newsstand price!
First Name
Last Name
Address 1
Address 2
City
State
ZIP     
Email

Should you decide not to continue receiving the magazine after the initial free issue, simply write "cancel" on the invoice and you will not be billed.

© 2009 by The American Prospect, Inc.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Permissions and Reprints