RSS Feeds Feeds: Articles | Issues
Articles About TAP Subscribe Donate
TAPPED  |  Beat the Press

Remember Me
Forgot your password?

The symbol identifies content for paid subscribers only.


 



The group blog of The American Prospect

WHEN DID THE NEW HAVEN FIRE DEPT. BECOME A MERITOCRACY?

On day four of the Sotomayor hearings, the focus was on her role in the case of Ricci v. DeStefano, the New Haven firefighter case. “Mr. Ricci has a story to tell, too,” said Sen. Lindsey Graham in a condescending lecture to Sotomayor. Ricci told that story this afternoon.

If you grew up in New Haven, as I did, it's really hard to see this centerpiece of the conservative argument against Sotomayor as some sort of real-world question of moral philosophy about who was most “deserving.” Rather, I suspect that Sotomayor understood perfectly well that this was another episode in a long urban melodrama as various white ethnic groups, Latinos, and blacks struggled for their share of political power and its benefits. If the New Haven Fire Department has become a pure meritocracy in which only the most objectively deserving are hired, that would be quite a revolution.

I've just been rereading Who Governs, a masterpiece of mid-century political science by Yale's Robert A. Dahl, which is basically the tale, told with charts, of the successive rise to power of each of New Haven's major ethnic populations. First the WASP establishment gave way to German immigrants, then the Irish and some Jews; the Irish slowly let in the Italians, and the Italian-American political machine held the reins for decades, against claims by the rising Latino and black populations, which now make up 60 percent of the city. At the time of Dahl's study, Italian-Americans were still working their way up, and they didn't begin to get a foothold in the fire and police departments until the 1950s.

But the story for blacks and Latinos -- particularly the former -- was quite different in New Haven and many other cities. New Haven's only had one black mayor, for four years in the early 1990s. The same is true of New York and Chicago, where blacks never quite achieved the level of political power commensurate with their percentage of the population. Where blacks and Latinos built coalitions, they could win. But as in Chicago and New York, they were split and the older white ethnic power structure remained. In addition to the legal questions, and whether New Haven faced the risk of a disparate-impact suit, this was also a decision by the city -- a political decision -- about how to resolve a decades-long dilemma about equality of opportunity. And the court was right -- both as a matter of law and empathy -- to let the city make that choice.

-- Mark Schmitt



COMMENTS

Dahl's book was not that great. Please read this instead http://sociology.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/local/new_haven.html .

What gets to me is the use that the Republican's are using Ricci vs Stefano against Sotamayor. If anything the emotional gut feeling ruling of a judge should go to those hard studying fire-fighters. But the cold facts, nothing but the facts was the actual ruling in the case. Precedence said if Blacks didn't make it through the exam they were discrimainated against.

The law is impartial: It forbids both the rich and poor from sleeping in alleys.

Thanks, I read Domhoff as well when I was 15 or 16. I'm digging back into the whole controversy, not just over those books but the flourishing of "pluralism" in political science, and I'll look at Domhoff again as well.

Good points guys, I know I go a black doctor because they are the majority race in my community.

Post a comment


Search TAPPED for:

Archives

About TAPPED

TAPPED, the Prospect's award-winning group blog, is a link-intensive collection of musings, ramblings, opinions and other assorted writing on the political developments of the day. See a list of our contributors.

| RSS | Twitter


Renew your print subscription or e-subscription.
Get an e-subscription for $14.95.
Give the gift of political insight. Send The American Prospect to a friend.
Change your email address or street address.
YES! I want to receive The American Prospect
— the essential source for progressive ideas.
Explore The American Prospect's award-winning investigative journalism and provocative essays in a free trial issue. Continue receiving The American Prospect at only $19.95 for a one-year subscription - a savings of 60% off the newsstand price!
First Name
Last Name
Address 1
Address 2
City
State
ZIP     
Email

Should you decide not to continue receiving the magazine after the initial free issue, simply write "cancel" on the invoice and you will not be billed.

© 2009 by The American Prospect, Inc.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Permissions and Reprints