BOOKS OF SAND. Chalk me up as one of those skeptics who don't buy, not even for a second, the spin that George W. Bush has read more than sixty books this year (via Steve Benen). C-SPAN claims to have a partial catalog of his reading list, but none of it makes any sense. While I'm pleased Bush is trying to accrue some intellectual credibility, the boast reminds me of nothing so much as Steve Carell in The 40-Year-Old Virgin recounting how "her" breasts felt like big bags full of sand! Right guys!?
In the flick, Carell's boast exposed his inexperience -- only a virgin would think that's how a breast felt. Bush's "sixty books" strikes me as similarly revealing. This is the claim of someone who wants to project dominance in a field he doesn't understand, and so wildly overreaches. Reading books, particularly nonfiction books, takes a really long time. It's hard, and it's boring, and I say this all as an effete liberal intellectual who likes reading long, boring books but can't, like everyone else I know, seem to finish them. I'm pleased to get through one or two a month, and you're telling me Bush, in his time off from running the country, doing a couple hours of exercise a day, and going to bed early, has read sixty? Already? Pshah. Over at Dan Froomkin's site, a reader crunched some of the numbers involved:
Of the twelve books listed, I come up with a total page count of 5,356 pages, including 1,585 pages not available until at least 4/2006 of this year. That is an average page count of 450 pages per book. Multiply by his 60 books so far this year for a total page count of 27,000. 27,000 pages means the President would have to average a little over 115 pages per day. Reading a quick pace of a little over a minute per page, that is two hours a day of reading, and let's be honest, longer if you want to retain information in these types of books. And this from a man who prides himself in not reading the paper. I don't buy it.
Me neither. However, I'm happy to see Bush lying about this. It's long past time ignorance stopped offering bragging rights. And we can only hope that, like Carell's ill-fated but ultimately transformative comment, the mockery over Bush's bookworm pretensions will help him pop his intellectual cherry before too long. Until then, however, I recommend my colleague Matt's article making the counter-counter-intuitive case that, yes, George W. Bush is stupid, and it is a problem.
--Ezra Klein
Feeds: 


COMMENTS (47)
Ezra, you just have a higher standard for "read" than our president. If you just look at the pictures, read the back cover and browse through the pages, it really doesn't take that long to "read" a book. In fact, I surprised he doesn't "read" a new book each day. I guess he tries to keep it down to one a week or so.
Posted by: Mark | August 22, 2006 5:27 PM
Oh, the numbers crunched are wrong. I get 75 pages a day. 115 would imply only 235 days a year.
Posted by: Mark | August 22, 2006 5:31 PM
Mark,
It's only August.
Whoever drew up that list on C-Span had pretty good taste. Points in Bush's favor if he is an actual Travis McGee fan.
I could actually see a person reading all those books this year (basically breezy mysteries and pop history), provided that person was NOT an early-retiring President of the United States.
It's a brag, a preposterous one, but as Ezra notes, an oddly heartening one.
Posted by: mikeg | August 22, 2006 5:42 PM
Mark - Bush's claim is that he has read 60 books so far this year (234 days into the year).
Posted by: Wolfstar | August 22, 2006 5:45 PM
i hear Bush's time swimming the Yangtse broke even Mao's record.
Posted by: jim | August 22, 2006 5:52 PM
There was a PDB prepared for each of these 60 books, and Bush read the PDBs.
(Then, of course, he told the intern who wrote the PDBs "There. Your ass is covered now.")
Posted by: The Confidence Man | August 22, 2006 5:53 PM
Did they note what editions of the books he read? Maybe they were the comic book adaptations?
Posted by: Manchurian Southerner | August 22, 2006 5:53 PM
Coincidentally, Bush is also a lot like Steve Carell's character on "The Office": incompetent, embarrassing, and always inappropriate, while believing himself to be hilarious and beloved.
Posted by: bobbo | August 22, 2006 5:54 PM
"i hear Bush's time swimming the Yangtse broke even Mao's record."
And Bush, despite all conventional wisdom, really can eat just one Lay's potato chip.
Posted by: Manchurian Southerner | August 22, 2006 5:57 PM
Why so skeptical?
I'm sure Bush is a devoted follower of the Magic Tree House series.
Posted by: Anderson | August 22, 2006 6:01 PM
Hey, the more time he spends reading, the less time he has to screw up everything else. Keep reading, Duh-bya!
Posted by: Seitz | August 22, 2006 6:05 PM
Reading books, particularly nonfiction books, takes a really long time. It's hard, and it's boring, and I say this all as an effete liberal intellectual
Way to shoot down your credibility.
I like social history (Poisoned Lives: English Poisoners and Their Victims), and I can polish one off in three or four evenings. I couldn't manage that naval battles book in that time, but the history of polio would be a piece of cake.
And I'm sure Mr. Bush reads equally quickly, of course. ;-)
Posted by: jonquil | August 22, 2006 6:20 PM
I expect he was actually rereading Hamlet.
Posted by: Dan | August 22, 2006 6:26 PM
I think it's rather funny there are a few Flashman books in there. Either the person who came up with that list has a wry sens of humor or Dear Leader has found a literary character he can truly identify with.
Hamlet and MacBeth are interesting choices as well. Maybe the Oedipus trilogy is on the part that's missing.
Posted by: Algerine | August 22, 2006 6:30 PM
Now I know why he read The Stranger (It's very short.).
Does he count comic books?
Posted by: jonm | August 22, 2006 6:37 PM
Ezra Klein says that he doesn't buy that Bush has read 60 books this year.
Hmm. I'm a fulltime Product Manager, and I spend my days online and in meetings. I do nearly all of my reading just before bed - and yet I've managed to plow through 30 non-fiction books this year (books on the order of "A Peace to End all Peace"). The President could easily have a couple of hours set aside per day to read - just because he doesn't read the newspapers doesn't mean that he doesn't read.
If I set aside 2 hours a day to read, I could probably get through 100+ non-fiction books a year - and retain what I'd read in them quite well, thank you.
As to Bush's supposed stupidity:
His SAT scores are public knowledge
He speaks very badly. That doesn't imply that he's a dunce, although it's an assumption most people make based on verbal skills.
Posted by: James Robertson | August 22, 2006 7:08 PM
The people who made the pronouncements about Bush having read a lot are not Bush - all his publicity like this comes from some of the finest political minds in America. So no, it's not going to be like a boast coming from an inexperienced virgin.
And more to the point, they aren't trying to convince intellectuals that he is intellectual. They would be trying to convince people who don't read a lot of books, who they see as their base.
So it would be more like a world-weary 17 year old describing french kissing to a bunch of over-eager 12 year olds. And yeah, it'd be inaccurate like that.
Posted by: Tony v | August 22, 2006 8:32 PM
The President is a committed and persistent reader. After all he did stay to finish "My Pet Goat."
Posted by: i didn't want to scare the children | August 22, 2006 10:37 PM
macbeth. that's classic...
Posted by: mercurino | August 23, 2006 1:17 AM
If there's any logical explanation, it's audiobooks. They've swapped out his music on his iPod shuffle for abridged versions.
One other mitigating circumstance is that he does commute by 'public' transport more than most Americans. Look at the reading patterns of people in cities with a subway/metro system or commuter rail and you'll find a lot more books consumed than for those who drive.
Posted by: ahem | August 23, 2006 4:33 AM
Was this list a gift to Maureen Dowd, or what?
I can't wait for Saturday.
Posted by: Sean | August 23, 2006 9:19 AM
Comparisons are odious (and how!) but Bill Clinton read 60 books before breakfast most days.
Posted by: Bill in Dresden | August 23, 2006 10:02 AM
And Bush, despite all conventional wisdom, really can eat just one Lay's potato chip.
Except that he's never heard of anyone named Lay before...
The President could easily have a couple of hours set aside per day to read - just because he doesn't read the newspapers doesn't mean that he doesn't read.
Oh, thank God...see, it works out just fine if the President who already keeps banker's hours sets aside two hours every day to read for pleasure, but refuses to touch current events from the newspapers. I feel safer already. Wasn't there a Flashman book that explained the difference between Shi'a and Sunni? Perhaps he'll get to that one soon.
I cheerfully give ground on stupid (especially with standardized test scores as evidence), yet maintain that year after year, we have received a constant stream of proof that Mr. Bush is almost entirely intellectually incurious. Yet he devours books with a passion that could only be matched by smug product managers? Sorry, but something doesn't jibe here.
Posted by: mds | August 23, 2006 10:04 AM
I'm most amused by the idea that coming up with a summer reading list of "big" books is a good way to demonstrate that Bush is too smart. Pity Mortimer Adler isn't still alive, he could school George on the Great Books.
Posted by: John Wayne | August 23, 2006 11:32 AM
Future scholars might study the tombs on Bush's reading list with an eye to discover clues to his policies and pronouncements. A perhaps useful collective noun to describe these works: "Bushlit"
Posted by: James Morrison | August 23, 2006 11:33 AM
The Patterson, Silva, and MacDonald books shouldn't take more than a couple of hours to finish.
I'm not thrilled to see a book from Silva's series publicly touted on the list, btw.
Posted by: Jackmormon | August 23, 2006 1:13 PM
Comparisons are odious (and how!) but Bill Clinton read 60 books before breakfast most days.
In his book Richard Clarke seemed dazzled by Clinton's book-a-night or nearly habit, but the Big Dog, after working until 2 a.m. seemed to like action-thrillers.
Me, I start a lot more non-fiction than I finish. In my old age, I'll even put away an unfinished novel if it isn't any good.
Posted by: J Bean | August 23, 2006 3:03 PM
Personally, I just can't get over the idea of Bush part 2 reading Camus at all, let alone The Stranger. As someone who actually got a degree in French, I can't possibly think of a more ironic reading choice he could have made. I'd think, if I ever met the man, I'd be unable to resist spending the entire time talking about the book.
Posted by: 32_Footsteps | August 23, 2006 3:26 PM
If W actually reads Flashman stories and doesn't feel an unpleasant shock, he is utterly lacking in self-awareness. But I guess we knew that.
Posted by: CJColucci | August 23, 2006 4:33 PM
Adding to the list of reasons against this wildly implausible scenario is the widely held perception of Bush as 'intellectually incurious.'
Posted by: cheSF | August 23, 2006 5:27 PM
I think it's rather funny there are a few Flashman books in there. Either the person who came up with that list has a wry sens of humor or Dear Leader has found a literary character he can truly identify with.
I don't see how anyone can read the Flashman books (especially Flashman at the Charge - the Light Brigade, you know) and buy into a "everything is great despite the naysayers" attitude.
But that's America - crapping itself and swearing violently while an idiot leads it into teh Valley of Doom.
Posted by: Phoenician in a time of Romans | August 23, 2006 9:00 PM
Read with interest the takes on Bush's reading marathon, but I think the most telling evidence of his either lying about having read the works or his failure to comprehend what he read came this past week when he was interviewed in New Orleans by Brian Williams of NBC. (Williams got a lot of flack for perceived belligerence and badgering if the NBC emails, shown by Williams on the nightly news, is any indication, as if we are supposed to refrain from treating a politician with any more respect than we'd show to a tax collector.) At one point in the interview, when Williams saw that he wasn't going to get an admission from Bush that the Administration itself had been at fault for the Katrina Fiasco, Williams switched gears and asked, "I understand you've been doing a lot of reading this summer?" To which, Bush replied yes, he had, then provided an aw-shucks confirmation he had indeed tackled Camus's *L'Etranger.* Then, as if to dodge further questioning designed to see if he'd understood what he'd read, Bush quickly added that he'd also read "three Shakespeares." Three of Shakespeare's what?! Obviously, the man thinks that the only works the Bard ever wrote were the plays. Seems to me there were a few sonnets in there somewhere; pretty good ones, I'm told. Then, perhaps to allay the fears of the beer and onions hoi polloi that he might -- he just MIGHT -- belong to what the late Spiro Agnew termed "pointy-headed intellectuals," Bush allowed as to how he'd *also* read biographies of sports figures. And then he betrayed his seeming inability to learn anything much from his reading as well as his cock-arrogant belief that he can use words he thinks he understands but cannot spell or pronounce. He said, "I guess you could say I'm kinda ecalectic[sic]." Last time I checked Webster's, the word, "eclectic," had three, not four syllables. Perhaps Karl Rove coached him at some time before the appearance and poor George simply forgot how to say the word. (After all, Bush was in the middle of a barn-storming spin-fest that took him way out west to preach to the choir (the VFW), the one-year anniversary of Katrina and the Battle of New Orleans coming in as a kind of photo op.) Somehow, it's rather difficult imagining a Vicente Fox saying "ecalectico" when the proper Spanish word is "eclectico." Not only does George lie, he does it with poor grammer, syntax, and pronunciation. Let's face it folks, what we have in the White House is a gold-plated hick from Midland, a man who apparently realized the Peter Principle and advanced his career to the point of incompetence long before 2000. The only reason he got a second term is that he and his Gestapo managed to scare the living crap out of a gulable American electrat. Ah, well, the Democrat Party is waiting in the wings....
Posted by: James M. Martin | September 2, 2006 1:12 AM
I wish we had more examples of Bush's poor reading and speaking habits...well, we do people! We do! So quit using his inability to properly use the English language. I've been known, even at my advanced age, to mispronounce a word that I've read repeatedly just because I've never connected the spelled word to the spoken word. Do I read? More than anyone here I'd venture to guess. And I always have; GWTW @12 yrs old. But epitome? Why isn't that word ep-i-tome? I knew what it meant in a sentence in a book. I definitely used the word appropriately in conversations. Didn't connect the two however! Give poor George a break. He needs at least one.
Posted by: MarchDancer | September 2, 2006 9:18 PM
moralities:tend Montreal ambient!Fischbein betraying .
Posted by: free online casino slot machines | September 20, 2006 5:26 PM
compensated,sermons:tourist bridesmaids ribbons rafters tampers .
Posted by: Anonymous | September 29, 2006 8:23 PM
Ezra, you just have a higher standard for "read" than our president. If you just look at the pictures, read the back cover and browse through the pages, it really doesn't take that long to "read" a book. In fact, I surprised he doesn't "read" a new book each day. I guess he tries to keep it down to one a week or so. I disagree go to http://www.apartments.waw.pl/
Posted by: Anonymous | October 25, 2006 7:48 AM
Ezra, you just have a higher standard for "read" than our president. If you just look at the pictures, read the back cover and browse through the pages, it really doesn't take that long to "read" a book. In fact, I surprised he doesn't "read" a new book each day. I guess he tries to keep it down to one a week or so. I disagree go to http://www.apartments.waw.pl/
Posted by: Anonymous | November 15, 2006 8:38 AM
retroactive grams.dysentery absolving loiters subdues disqualify madam Marlborough.
Posted by: Anonymous | November 15, 2006 8:48 PM
nooblet
Posted by: Anonymous | March 29, 2007 10:39 AM
Phenomenal Stories Cash Advance Loans Update Un-deniably finance experts assist quick Cash Advance which focuses on online cash advance loans : Hear More On Cash Advance Loans - www.horizoncashadvance.com
Posted by: Anonymous | April 2, 2007 12:59 PM
Phenomenal Stories Cash Advance Loans Update Un-deniably finance experts assist quick Cash Advance which focuses on online cash advance loans : Hear More On Cash Advance Loans - www.horizoncashadvance.com
Posted by: Anonymous | April 2, 2007 12:59 PM
Phenomenal Stories Cash Advance Loans Update Un-deniably finance experts assist quick Cash Advance which focuses on online cash advance loans : Hear More On Cash Advance Loans - www.horizoncashadvance.com
Posted by: Anonymous | April 2, 2007 1:00 PM
fbdstxh nsyobirkp icxzkmeol cgkao tvwexnhdz mbgeos yzotvwbmh
Posted by: Anonymous | April 26, 2007 5:17 AM
fbdstxh nsyobirkp icxzkmeol cgkao tvwexnhdz mbgeos yzotvwbmh
Posted by: Anonymous | April 26, 2007 5:18 AM
rtvyxsaf bijv mcpdqkth vfjuzsnh adpi rhyftxgp nsxqzbky
Posted by: ikrdcqu nqrfpxsz | May 29, 2007 9:03 PM
rtvyxsaf bijv mcpdqkth vfjuzsnh adpi rhyftxgp nsxqzbky
Posted by: ikrdcqu nqrfpxsz | May 29, 2007 9:04 PM
Oops.
Posted by: Did Ezra actually read this book? | January 10, 2008 3:30 PM