FRED THOMPSON IS A VERY MANLY GUY. And Michael M. Rosen is a very hackish writer. His op-ed in yesterday's Politico is mind-numbing in its sheer pseudo-serious inanity. Read it and learn why:
Conservatives should like Thompson for his manliness
In his book on manliness, a topic on which he's widely recognized as the national expert, Harvard's Harvey Mansfield wrote that "a manly man asserts himself so that he and the justice he demands are not overlooked."This textured understanding of masculinity -- i.e., that men (in the true sense of the term) act, but act for justice and on principle -- can aptly be used to understand the phenomenon that is potential Republican presidential candidate Fred Thompson. The former senator from Tennessee conveys a certain seriousness of purpose married to an authentic and thoughtful expression of principle that has rapidly become appealing to many conservatives.
Thompson is actually an intellectual heavyweight
Contrary to his depiction in the media as a slacker, Thompson's contributions to the American Enterprise Institute, the Council on Foreign Relations and the State Department's International Security Advisory Board attest to his intellectual heft. His stints as a talk-radio guest host and a sometime columnist for National Review Online showcase the thoughtful, conservative ideas he's been percolating for decades. The senator's recent commentary covers everything from gun control to Hamas to the Libby prosecution to the "flying imams." Thompson appears to be a man of thought and action; his "principled manliness" transcends mere machismo.
But the other GOP contenders are all pretty manly dudes too
Without question, Big Fred faces challenges on many fronts. The recent reshuffling of his (pre-)campaign staff will only exacerbate his already late start in the contest; meanwhile, his principal competitors -- all of whom are both principled and masculine in their own ways -- haven't yet begun to counterattack.
Interestingly, back in December 2005, Rosen seemed smitten with Mitt Romney. I guess the former governor just wasn't manly enough for this "attorney in San Diego."
--Steven White
Feeds: 



COMMENTS (8)
My favorite part of Rosen's article comes when he refers to a Michelle Cottle TNR piece on Thompson and says that her analysis is "in places superficial." These people really are somethin', aren't they?
Posted by: Farinata X | August 2, 2007 2:30 PM
Pull yourself together, Mike. And wipe that hair gel off your chin. That is hair gel, right?
Posted by: brewmn | August 2, 2007 2:47 PM
Writing for NRO! He's the intellectual equal of Goldberg and Lopez!
Posted by: Rob | August 2, 2007 3:01 PM
Since when has contributing or having anything to do with the American Enterpise Institute been an indicator of one's intellectual heft? Really, they should call that hack-house the American Idiots Institute.
Posted by: mau mau | August 2, 2007 3:03 PM
Rosen is a co-worker and actually a really good guy, but the Politico fails to mention that he's also Secretary of the San Diego Republicn Party. So, yeah. I wouldn't expect fair and balanced.
http://www.sandiegorepublicans.org/about/board/
Posted by: Anonymous | August 2, 2007 3:46 PM
When I saw Professor Mansfield on the Colbert Report, it was difficult to figure out which one of them was trying to act like a moron. Mansfield’s arguments amounted to a rickety edifice of false dichotomies which at any moment threatened to collapse down upon itself. (Such flaccid thinking from teacher at one of America’s great universities.)
Another thing about MANsfield: He’s sort of a twerp.
Posted by: fredo bush | August 2, 2007 6:45 PM
Yes, Mansfield wouldn't know manliness if it hit him in the mouth.
Posted by: Anonymous | August 2, 2007 8:40 PM
Martha Nussbaum's review of Mansfield's "Manliness" book is quite possibly the greatest academic review ever. She just eviscerates him, over and over, using only the extreme philosophical method of logic and reading. It's great stuff.
Nussbaum's review of Mansfield.
Posted by: DivGuy | August 3, 2007 8:56 AM