RUDY GIULIANI WILL KILL YOU (WITH LAMENESS). Rudy Giuliani's Foreign Affairs article is the dumbest/scariest thing I've read in a serious journal in quite some time. In fact, I almost regret reading it, as I could have spent my time doing something more intellectually engaging like
punching myself in the face. Here's the article's summary: "The next U.S. president will face three key foreign policy challenges: setting a course for victory in the terrorists' war on global order, strengthening the international system the terrorists seek to destroy, and extending the system's benefits. With a stronger defense, a determined diplomacy, and greater U.S. economic and cultural influence, the next president can start to build a lasting, realistic peace." And here are the reasons it's so hard to take Giuliani seriously:
- The very first sentence: "We are all members of the 9/11 generation."
- The phrase "Terrorists War on Us" is now capitalized.
- Dumb statements like: "And the era of cost-free anti-Americanism must end."
- Grand new ideas like: "Companies such as Pepsi, Coca-Cola, McDonald's, and Levi's helped win the Cold War by entering the Soviet market. Cultural events, such as Van Cliburn's concerts in the Soviet Union and Mstislav Rostropovich's in the United States, also hastened change. Today, we need a similar type of exchange with the Muslim countries."
- Oh, and we totally had Vietnam: "America must remember one of the lessons of the Vietnam War. Then, as now, we fought a war with the wrong strategy for several years. And then, as now, we corrected course and began to show real progress. Many historians today believe that by about 1972 we and our South Vietnamese partners had succeeded in defeating the Vietcong insurgency and in setting South Vietnam on a path to political self-sufficiency. But America then withdrew its support, allowing the communist North to conquer the South. The consequences were dire, and not only in Vietnam: numerous deaths in places such as the killing fields of Cambodia, a newly energized and expansionist Soviet Union, and a weaker America. The consequences of abandoning Iraq would be worse."
Could be the next president, folks. Seriously.
--Steven White
Feeds: 



COMMENTS (9)
I"m confused. Does "setting a course to victory in the terrorists global war" mean that the next president has the job of running the terrorists war for them so they can win? Because Bush pretty much has that locked up strategically and I think, given his success already in installing Al Quaeda in Iraq and making Iraq part of greater Iran that he's done a bang up job. Can *any* new president do as much as Bush has for the terrorists? I don't think so.
aimai
Posted by: aimai | August 15, 2007 11:42 AM
His take on the Vietnam war and the post war environment is unique to say the least. Of course a labrador retriever might have a more informed version.
Posted by: Col Bat Guano | August 15, 2007 11:55 AM
Sorry, this was the war he chose not to fight in?
Draft-dodging war supporters who think Iraq was a fabulous idea...gosh, where have I seen these types before?
Posted by: anonymous | August 15, 2007 12:44 PM
I like the part about the "numerous deaths" in the Cambodian killing fields.
Posted by: Farinata X | August 15, 2007 2:17 PM
seriously? SERIOUSLY?
Does he not understand that the US put the Khmer Rouge in power, and Vietnam took them out in '79? Has Giuliani never even read a basic high school history textbook?
Dear sweet christ, this is worse than I thought.
Posted by: alli | August 15, 2007 2:19 PM
His take on the Vietnam war and the post war environment is unique to say the least.
It's not unique at all, of course. It's the standard hardcore conservative narrative that never dies.
Even the Germans got over their crazy stab-in-the-back ideas. These guys will never learn.
Posted by: Steve | August 15, 2007 2:27 PM
It's not unique at all, of course. It's the standard hardcore conservative narrative that never dies.
True, but most of them managed to keep that personality locked in the closet during the campaign. You rarely see it trotted out like a prize Pekinese at the Westminster dog show.
Posted by: Col Bat Guano | August 15, 2007 3:45 PM
Why on earth is Foreign Affairs publishing this, is what I wants ta know.
Posted by: Crazed Opossum | August 15, 2007 4:03 PM
Rudy doesn't know shiite about the Middle East or Vietnam or history in general. It's pretty darned clear that Podhoretz wrote most or all of this crazy piece of crap.
And I totally can see our country making this maniac our next president. Totally...
Posted by: OGLiberal | August 15, 2007 5:40 PM