MCCASKILL EXPLAINS WHY CHANGE IS ACTUALLY NEEDED.
I'm watching the convention on C-Span from my couch in D.C. like a good blogger (no Cheetos though) and from my perspective Claire McCaskill is knocking this out of the park. Rather than vague statements about how Obama is, like, totally awesome, she's saying McCain would be a bad president. Doesn't sound like much, but no one else is doing it.
"Change" as a message is meaningless without any argument about, you know, why we need it. McCaskill, unlike so many other people out there tonight, is making that argument and arguing that McCain represents part of the problem, not the solution. It's not an artful speech or particularly well delivered, but it actually makes sense logically, and that makes up for a lot.
--Sam Boyd
Feeds: 


COMMENTS (1)
Unfortunately, no one saw her because all the major networks had their pundits and anchors blithering on about the Clinton/Obama civil war. They also didn't pickup any of ex-GOP Congrressman Jim Leach's endorsement of Obama.
But then I'm sure they probably won't give any coverage to Leiberman either, right?
Posted by: The Other Ed | August 26, 2008 10:15 AM