RSS Feeds Feeds: Articles | Issues
Articles About TAP Subscribe Donate
TAPPED  |  Beat the Press

Remember Me
Forgot your password?

The symbol identifies content for paid subscribers only.


 



The group blog of The American Prospect

SEIU MEMBERS PREDICT EDWARDS ENDORSEMENT.

Edwards1edwards2


(Photos: SEIU members in John Edwards T-shirts provided by their SEIU locals. Washington, D.C., Sept. 17, 2007.)

It's hard sometimes in the heat of the moment to distinguish enthusiasm for a politician's rousing speech from enthusiasm for the politician himself. So in the cool of the evening I headed out to the courtyard of the Washington Hilton, where the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) Political Action Conference attendees were mingling over drinks and nibbling on breaded shrimp, roast beef, and veggies. Despite the tremendous outpouring of enthusiasm for Barack Obama from the conference's audience of union leaders and regular members earlier in the day, member after member predicted that loyalty would trump enthusiasm, and that John Edwards, the candidate who has most assiduously courted labor, would win the SEIU's straw poll, and eventually the powerful and activist union's nod.

"I will fall off my chair tomorrow if he don't get it," said Tamekia Robinson of California's Local 1000, predicting a win for Edwards in the SEIU's straw poll, whose results will be announced tomorrow. "If he don't get it, I will be highly, highly, highly surprised."

Robinson, who described herself as an Obama supporter, said she was pleased that the membership was included in the endorsement process, even though she thinks the outcome is already foreordained. "I think it's nice they did their little fluff, their go-around, even though it was already concluded," she said. Three of the five largest SEIU locals have already called, at the conference, for an endorsement of Edwards, she noted. It would be hard for anyone to trump that.

"We had a meeting," explained Laurene Mackay of the United Long Term Care Workers, Local 6434, which she says endorsed Edwards in a membership vote "at the union." Mackay sported a T-shirt with the John Edwards campaign logo on it, printed in the SEIU colors of yellow on purple, that her local had given her. "We had already chosen who we were going to vote for," she explained. "Then we got the T-shirts."

Those T-shirts were a matter of some controversy with one of her table-mates, Larry Perkins of Local 1000. "I was O.K. with the presentations today with everyone until they got to John Edwards," he said. "Then I saw all these purple and yellow T-shirts with "John Edwards" on them and I didn't see shirts for anybody else. It was like they were steering people to John Edwards." Of course, Perkins himself had been an Edwards man until he saw that. "It was like, man, this was engineered," he said.

Others ranked the support of the crowd as putting Edwards in the lead, with Obama in second, and Hillary Clinton a close third or even with Obama. "Edwards was number one in there, to people responding to him," said Rita Stephenson, also of Local 1000, who personally liked Clinton and Edwards best. "Obama was second. She was maybe third." Her dinner companion, Attila Gabor of Local 1021, agreed about Obama. "I think he got a very good reception but I think Edwards was on top of him," he said, lifting his hand up to his face to demonstrate how high the support for Edwards stretched.

Jason Morales, of Local 1199 United Healthcare East (one of the three which has called for an SEIU endorsement of Edwards at the conference, according to Robinson), said that he came out of the day most pleasantly surprised by Chris Dodd's performance. "I thought he was going to be dull and boring," he said, but "the energy that he had and that he brought to the table" was impressive. Morales had kind words for Obama, too, whom he called "unbelievable, a great speaker." But when pressed about where his support lay, Morales eventually gave the most frequently heard answer.

"I like Edwards," he said. "He's a labor man."

--Garance Franke-Ruta



COMMENTS

Yes, however, I honestly don't think that this matters that much. Unions just aren't as powerful as they have been in the past, and it isn't going to be enough to beat Hillary. Sadly, corporate funded Democrats will still win.

Interesting news. An SEIU endorsement would be a huge shot in the arm for Edwards. While it may or may not show up in the national polls, having the institutional support of over 3 million union members (SEIU + Edwards' other labor endorsements) would help immeasurably in the early states - not to mention the positive press generated for the campaign.

~~ GFR's Assignment Desk ~~

Please read through the links on this page: tinyurl.com/22gkbb

As you can see, there are quite a few links between the SEIU and people with interesting views and links. Perhaps GFR should ask them about that.

Perhaps GFR should also ask them what percentage of their total dues is from work that was performed illegally.

They are right. John Edwards is a union man. He has "lived" union, since so many of his family members have had benefits and health care because of unions, from his mother to his only brother. I like to say that John Edwards comes from a union family, a hard-working union family, and based on his upbringing, John Edwards went to college getting an undergraduate degree in textile management because he didn't expect his life to take the path that it did. He has a strong "working" foundation, and he didn't forget where he came from. When he worked with the unions over the last few years to organize and pass ballot initiatives, he understood the importance of what they were doing, because he has seen the results of it in his life.

Does wonkette ever do anything other than take cheap shots at John Edwards?

The corporate funded Democrats will not win in the end.

Hillary Clinton's worst nightmare is for John Edwards to win Iowa & Nevada heading into New Hampshire, because if he does, he's not going to lose New Hampshire, no matter how strong the Clintons are there (Michigan looks like a bunch of spoiled brats trying to squeeze into a day behind Iowa...grow up, already).

Just winning Iowa may not have been enough to win New Hampshire, but winning two states would do John Edwards a lot of good.

Now, I don't trust the electronic voting machines.

I need to get Howard Dean to get the primaries elections on paper ballots. Every state, according to Bradblog, has paper ballots and could perform an election on paper ballots TOMORROW if necessary, so the excuses about not having "time" to prepare for a paper election are a lie.

But anyway, you get the point.

Nice, very, very nice. If Edwards does get the nod, this will definitely give him some organizational depth, in Iowa and especially the Feb 5 states.

It looks like the SEIU is the only real union left in this country not run by corrupt political influence peddlers.

Seriously, refusing to endorse one of the few Candidates who are actually good for unions out of the fear that Clinton will retaliate isn't only cowardice, it's telling. Her fans always say she's an ally of the working man, yet these unions seem awfully terrified about getting on her bad side. Were she truly comitted to working Americans, she wouldn't turn their back on them if their unions don't endorse her in the primaries. That so many of these unions think she will tells you that she cares nothing about working americans.

Post a comment


Search TAPPED for:

Archives

About TAPPED

TAPPED, the Prospect's award-winning group blog, is a link-intensive collection of musings, ramblings, opinions and other assorted writing on the political developments of the day. See a list of our contributors.

| RSS | Twitter


Renew your print subscription or e-subscription.
Get an e-subscription for $14.95.
Give the gift of political insight. Send The American Prospect to a friend.
Change your email address or street address.
YES! I want to receive The American Prospect
— the essential source for progressive ideas.
Explore The American Prospect's award-winning investigative journalism and provocative essays in a free trial issue. Continue receiving The American Prospect at only $19.95 for a one-year subscription - a savings of 60% off the newsstand price!
First Name
Last Name
Address 1
Address 2
City
State
ZIP     
Email

Should you decide not to continue receiving the magazine after the initial free issue, simply write "cancel" on the invoice and you will not be billed.

© 2009 by The American Prospect, Inc.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Permissions and Reprints